07/05/2025
*This post is for childhood trauma survivors processing a type of parent who complicates and confuses love. It is not directed at parents trying to break generational cycles and doing their best to take action and parent from a different place. I see you and honor you.
There is a common issue in childhood trauma recovery where, at some point, many survivors need to unpack and redefine how they experienced love from a parent.
Some survivors grew up in anti-love families where no adult was safe. Some grew up with a blatantly unsafe and abusive parent paired with a parent who was seemingly safer and more available if not bonded with their child.
The safer parent, often the parent we need to do more healing work around due to the complexity, is extremely tricky because, in some ways, there was love, but not the love that counts, such as protection.
Here are some examples of expressions of love but not protection.
*Soothing a child after abuse from the other parent, but not taking action against the offending parent.
*Comforting a child after abuse from a sibling, but also somewhat blaming them for not seeing it coming.
On the surface, and especially to the safer parent, it seems harsh and punitive to hold them accountable when there may have been attempts at expressing love or acknowledging the abuse in indirect ways.
However, children are set up by a safer parent who often teaches that one is powerless against abusers and that love without real action is good enough when it is not.
The genuine love of a child is fierce and brave.
The concept that love is a behavior and not a declaration is helpful in processing the safer parents.
Doing work around the safer parent will often involve intense guilt and shame at getting to the grief and anger about their lack of responsibility. Our inner child usually needs to see the safer parent as a secure home base, and our inner adult needs to help them know they weren't.
Getting to the grief and reality is what will free us from the idea that we weren't worthy of complete protection, and that it wasn't that bad when it was.
What do you think?