17/10/2024
This is the third dialogue between myself and person-centred therapist and trainer, Chris Molyneux, about the relationship between person-centred and pluralistic approaches.
In the dialogue, we explore the question of what 'person-centred' really means. Is it, as Chris suggests, an approach that is based around the 'six conditions', or are multiple definitions legitimate? Who gets to define what is 'person-centred', on what grounds, and what are the implications of this for the approach? And we also talk more about the nuances of the pluralistic approach and the importance of being precise in discussing it: in particular, the distinction between a pluralistic philosophical outlook and a pluralistic practice.
There's agreement and disagreement, challenges, and exploration of personal histories and 'triggers'. And we don't come to any definite conclusions. Through the dialogical process, though, I think we lay out more clearly what some of the key issues are.
This is the third dialogue with person-centred therapist and trainer, Chris Molyneux, about the relationship between person-centred and pluralistic approache...