02/01/2026
Thank you Vindya Pathiraja, Om Kurmi, and Gayathri Delanerolle from the MARIE WP2a project for the opportunity to contribute to this paper which explores the availability and acceptability of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using insights of pharmacists.
HRT remains underutilised and under-researched in LMICs despite its potential to alleviate menopausal symptoms for many. This study explored pharmacists’ perspectives on the use, cost, and availability of HRT across six LMICs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January 1 to March 31, 2025, as part of the Global Menopause Project. Pharmacists working in community, hospital, and private sector settings in Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Nigeria, Ghana, and Tanzania were recruited. Participants completed an anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire was piloted prior to dissemination and assessed HRT availability, pricing, and perceived barriers to use.
Here is what we found -
A total of 331 pharmacists responded: Ghana (18·4%), Sri Lanka (17·5%), Tanzania (16·9%), Nepal (16·6%), Malaysia (15·4%), and Nigeria (15·1%). The respondents were almost equally distributed between s*xes (50·8% were female), and most were aged 26–35 years (49·0%). The majority worked in private community pharmacies (41·7%) or government hospitals (32·6%), and 57·4% were based in urban areas. From the sample, 68·9% of pharmacists reported that HRTs were available for dispensing in their respective countries (highest proportion was reported in Nepal, 92·7% and lowest in Nigeria, 42%). HRT costs varied widely, with Sri Lanka reporting the highest prices and Malaysia the lowest. Key barriers identified included low health literacy, economic constraints, and limited healthcare access. Significant disparities exist in HRT access, availability and affordability across LMICs, with urban-rural gaps further compounding inequities. Pharmacists’ insights underscore the urgent need for inclusive, equitable strategies in menopausal care and women’s health policy in resource-limited settings.
We identified a need to incorporate updated and evidence-based content on menopause and HRT into pharmacy education and ongoing healthcare professional development programs. This will help ensure pharmacists are equipped with accurate knowledge about the indications, formulations, and dosing of HRT. Second, public health authorities should implement awareness campaigns to clarify widespread misconceptions, particularly the confusion between HRT and contraceptives, which were notably prevalent in some regions. Third, there is a need to improve access and reduce disparities in availability and cost of HRT - governments and healthcare systems should explore ways to regulate HRT pricing and consider subsidy mechanisms to make preparations more affordable. Finally, establishing standardised, country-specific guidelines for pharmacists on HRT use can promote consistent counselling and dispensing practices. Together, these recommendations support safer, more equitable, and better-informed use of HRT in diverse healthcare settings.
We must make sure that the benefits of growing awareness and education about menopause and HRT (benefits versus risks) should reach everyone across the world and they should have a choice of all lifestyle, non-HRT and HRT interventions to manage their symptoms and quality of life.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-18083-x