The Healing Miracle

28/02/2026

28/02/2026

We are living in a time when power feels performative, reactive, hungry for dominance. Titles are confused with wisdom. Volume is mistaken for authority. Truth is bent to fit ego.

A council of grandmothers represents something entirely different. Not nostalgia, but leadership shaped by memory and consequence, by the lived understanding that every decision ripples forward into bodies and soil and children not yet born.

Grandmothers know what survives and what collapses. They understand the cost of pride. They recognize how fragile ecosystems are, how fragile trust is, how quickly harm multiplies when accountability disappears.

This longing is not about replacing one hierarchy with another. It is about craving continuity instead of conquest. But it is also more personal than politics.

For generations, matriarchal wisdom was buried, dismissed, burned, institutionalized, rewritten. The brilliance of women who understood land, cycles, conflict, healing, governance, and restraint was treated as threat instead of inheritance. Their knowing did not vanish. It went underground.

We feel the absence because the memory still lives in us.
Looking to the matrilineal line is not regression. It is reclamation. Discernment runs in our blood. Authority does not have to dominate to be real.

Perhaps what we are aching for is not only governance shaped by those who remember. Perhaps we are being asked to become what we were denied.
꩜ Ella

28/02/2026

Most working class people around the world wake up with the same goals. Provide for their families. Stay safe. Build a better future for their children. They do not naturally wake up wanting conflict with strangers in another country who are doing the exact same thing.

Ordinary people often have more in common with each other than they realize. Shared struggles, shared responsibilities, shared hopes. Yet history shows that fear, misinformation, and powerful interests can push societies toward division. When emotions are stirred and narratives are controlled, people can be persuaded to act against their own long term interests.

War is rarely felt the same way by those who decide it and those who endure it. The costs are carried by families, communities, and future generations. That is why critical thinking, open dialogue, and accountability matter so much.

Peace begins when people recognize their shared humanity. When we question what we are told, seek understanding, and refuse to be manipulated by fear, we protect not only ourselves but each other. Unity among ordinary people is stronger than division fueled from above.💡✅

28/02/2026

Dr. Eric Nepute treated over 11,000 Covid patients using early prevention methods like Vitamin D, Quercetin, and Zinc, and not a single patient died. Yet the Biden Administration went after him with a $500 BILLION lawsuit, targeting him for offering alternatives to the hospital pipeline that pushed Remdesivir and ventilators.

Despite saving lives, Dr. Nepute was deplatformed, demonetized, banned, and forced to rebuild his life while Fauci, Gates, and others profited billions with zero accountability. The pandemic medical scams are coming to light, and the truth is shocking.

28/02/2026

27/02/2026

27/02/2026

Are top journalists attempting to diminish the crimes and network of Epstein? Whitney Webb responded to Michael Shellenberger's investigation that appears to protect elitists:

"I just think it's really interesting that the leading outlet pushing the "Epstein Mythology" narrative is Compact Magazine, which is funded by Soros' Open Soceities and Peter Thiel. Thiel has a lot of egg on his face with respect to Epstein given the releases of the last 12 months or so and Soros' nephew Peter is a circled name in Epstein's black book (i.e. accused of actively enabling s*x trafficking by Epstein's former butler).

The Epstein case and all of its "conspiratorial" bent have been around since 2019, and in some circles before. Yet, only when the Epstein case became truly inconvenient for the Big Tech oligarchs like Thiel/Musk and for the Trump administration, did this narrative become so prominent so suddenly. Compact seems to be in the middle of most of it. Also notable is that a lot of the "independent" voices making the Epstein mythology narrative previously cultivated public trust in figures like Musk or Thiel as well as the incoming Trump administration or figures currently serving in it (e.g. Tulsi Gabbard). Never before it was a problem for those actors were they interested in questioning the Epstein case, even when there were many years to do so.

I don't think it's fair to say they have only noticed just now that something may have been "off" with aspects of the s*x trafficking story or certain Epstein victim's testimonies. Those issues have been around for years and even those like myself have asserted that the s*x trafficking case was intentionally being made to dominate the focus around the Epstein case so that it was only about the s*x crimes, not about the financial crimes or about the clear existence of a supranational network (or networks) that Epstein was operating on behalf of. Yet, now that they question the s*x trafficking narrative or the possible role of a government, they are uninterested in these other questions of power or of oligarchy. Instead it is about age of consent laws, or about pre vs post puberty minors, or about "anti-semitism" or a desire to see "conspiracy" where there is none. Go back to sleep. The real enemy is the woke mind virus and Elon and Peter are the "cool" billionaires.

Regarding the thread below, my problems with Shellenberger's specific views expressed in this tweet thread are as follows (at least these are the problems that came to me while I read it):

1. He assumes the released emails to date is all the evidence there is to see on Epstein and potential intelligence ties. The released emails don't cover all of his email addresses, they are unencrypted ones he obviously wouldn't use for sensitive comms, and what has been released by the DOJ is estimated to represent just 2% of all of its Epstein-related documentation.

2. He assumes that, if Epstein did have an intel affiliation, there would be an email saying "thanks so much for all your hard work jeff, much love, mossad/cia/mI6" or something similar

3. I don't think Shellenberger (or others making similar arguments) understands how intelligence agencies actually work. These agencies routinely serve oligarchs and their networks, intelligence agencies frequently use private companies and businessmen as cover or fixers and, as my books show, US and Israeli intelligence relied on the same close-knit group of actors with these affiliations over many decades and these actors, Epstein included, represented oligarch interests who have clear influence over national governments and their intelligence agencies.

Much of my work on intelligence agencies, particularly US intelligence, shows how they have sought to largely move into the private sector to work beyond the scope of federal oversight, this was their game plan beginning with Iran Contra and the creation of Thiel's Palantir to replace Total Information Awareness. Several big Silicon Valley companies are now so intertwined with intelligence agencies you can't tell where one ends the other begins. Israel has an admitted policy of using its tech companies, particularly in cybersecurity, for conducting Mossad and other intelligence ops they used to do "in house."

Intelligence agencies are useful to the elite because they are used to shield the criminality of the powerful by offering it state protection. They are used to help the powerful consolidate their control, they go after their competitors in arms, drugs and s*x trafficking and make sure they have that s**t buttoned up. They keep law enforcement from digging too far into billionaires' activities. They overthrow governments for billionaires and the multinational corps they control. They do not run the show and, oddly, the Epstein emails that have been released do actually shed light on some of these powerful billionaires who are running things, it just seems that these narratives, such as what you see from Shellenberger below, seem to conveniently ignore their existence.

Journalism, to me, is about holding the powerful to account, not trying to minimize the crimes of the powerful only when the billionaire you attached yourself to and whose reputation you helped launder gets outed for lying about his ties to Epstein."

-Whitney Webb

27/02/2026

The utter humiliation of both the British Government AND the official opposition in the Manchester by-election is THE story in British politics. The two cheeks of the same arse have been soundly spanked and a new political order is emerging.

The tin-foil clad alliance for War, for Israel, for Austerity, for the spiralling decline of Britain has been torn asunder.

The Epstein class of British politicians has been smashed.

Our decision- my decision- to stand down and get behind the best-placed vehicle to achieve this result has been vindicated. It’s called leadership.

Starmer must go.

But replacing him with a tax-cheating scrubber or a Mandelson fan-boy will solve nothing.

Labour itself is finished. It’s race is run. Its serial betrayal of the working class has come to an end.

It’s hopeless devotion to war and the genociding of Peoples all over the world it’s mania for militarism and the language of empire and racism it’s unconvincing posturing on the world stage has left it the third party in the state.

The fraudulent parliamentary majority it holds now hangs about it like a giants robe upon a dwarfish thief. As Oscar Wilde said on the death scene in Little Nell: you’d have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.

I congratulate the Greens on their victory and wish Hannah every success as a member of parliament. Now we as a people must unite for still greater victories.

George Galloway
Workers Party of Britain