20/02/2026
Right. Let’s have a chat about the Veterinary Surgeons Act reform (VSA), the politicians seem to be, but just surface level. No real explanation of what things mean.
Because yes, protecting the RVN title matters. Hugely. I WILL keep banging that drum; we have been for quite some time.
Title protection isn’t ego, it’s public safety, clarity, accountability and trust. It's knowing that the person the public are entrusting their beloved pets to is accountable.
If you’re an RVN (or know one), that should mean something legally, not just socially.
But here’s where the conversation keeps wobbling. At the moment, vets and nurses are regulated as individuals. We are regulated and registered, sworn in with an oath. We answer to the RCVS. We have Codes of Conduct, CPD requirements, fitness to practise.
If we get it wrong, it’s our name, our registration, our career on the line. It's us, as individuals, who risk disciplinary action and being struck off.
Businesses? Not so much. How can that be? Do the public really know?
And that gap is doing real damage.
There are now more than 6,000 veterinary premises in the UK.......but when I tried to find how many 'fertility clinics' there were, I struggled. They slip through the cracks. They even advertise taking bloods.....which is a bit wild given it's not allowed unless it's taken by a vet professional. Make it make sense. We will dig into that more later.
Yet there is no single regulator overseeing veterinary businesses as businesses.
Some elements get picked up piecemeal
• The VMD looks at medicines supply and advertising
• Trading Standards may step in around consumer law and misleading claims
• The CMA is investigating pricing, transparency and market power (welcomed by vet professionals)
But none of these bodies are set up to regulate ethical clinical delivery at a business level.
Which means you can end up with
• Services operating in ethical grey areas
• Fertility clinics, breeding services and add-ons that sit uncomfortably with welfare science
• Commercial pressure quietly shaping care pathways
And when something goes wrong? It lands on the professional. Usually, the vet or the nurse in the room.
That’s the bit I can’t get comfortable with.
You cannot keep tightening regulations on individuals while leaving the systems they work in largely untouched. Time has moved on and scope has broadened to meet demand.
That isn’t balance. It’s offloading risk.
If VSA reform is serious about
• animal welfare
• public trust
• protecting professionals
• and yes, properly protecting the RVN title
Then it has to go further than scopes and job titles.It has to look at how businesses are owned, incentivised and held to account alongside the people delivering care. I mean, if fertility clinics really cared about the miracle of life.....they'd do it for free? But nope.....platinum frenchies seem to be the thing.
Otherwise, we’re just asking regulated professionals to operate ethically while others run free, masquerading as safe, in plain sight.
Bring on the VSA reforms. The Veterinary Surgeons Act is outdated and is no longer fit for the profession, public or animals it serves.
Please, add to the consultation. It matters. Animal welfare needs you to raise your voice....constructively.