24/07/2025
It’s always been my tendency to question - to lean into discomfort when things don’t quite add up.
But over time, both through my own experiences within the system and through my work with clients, that quiet questioning has become louder.
I’ve found myself asking:
Who gets to define what’s functional, healthy, or whole?
Whose lens are we trusting - and at what cost?
So much of what is still held up as ‘expertise’ around neurodivergence is built on a deficit-based model - one that categorises people according to what they lack, what they can’t do, or how well they mimic neurotypical norms.
And too often, those models don’t just misrepresent neurodivergent people - they gatekeep access to support, belonging, and self-trust.
Which brings me to this:
Imagine a world designed for neurodivergent people…
A world where curiosity was a currency.
Where movement was welcomed, not punished.
Where emotions were seen as wisdom, not weakness.
Where communication was allowed to be direct, layered, or nonlinear.
Where time bent around focus, not the other way around.
In many Indigenous and Eastern cultures, this wasn’t a fantasy - it was closer to reality.
Communities were often built around interdependence, intuition, sensitivity, and flexibility. People had space to co-regulate, to honour natural rhythms, and to contribute according to their strengths. Difference was part of the social fabric - not a flaw to be corrected.
But as modern Western society industrialised, everything changed.
The rise of the clock, the conveyor belt, and the curriculum brought with it a new kind of pressure:
Conform. Obey. Produce. Repeat.
Education became standardised. Work became rigid. Emotions became inconvenient. Movement became disruptive. And suddenly, the minds that once thrived in fluid, intuitive, relational environments began to fail - not because they were broken, but because the world around them had stopped making space for them.
So we labelled them.
We called their brilliance a disorder.
We pathologised their attention, their energy, their sensitivity — to draw attention away from the fact that it was the systems, not the people, that were malfunctioning.
Now, many neurodivergent people find their only real sanctuary in digital spaces - communities online where their thinking is valued, their rhythms respected, and their differences seen as gifts, not glitches.
Neurodivergence isn’t the problem.
The environment is.
It’s time to remember that the way things are is not the way they have to be or have always been.
And maybe - just maybe - the minds we’re trying to fix are actually here to help us build something better.