23/02/2026
My views on the proposed SEND reforms
Today has been a busy day, not least because I’ve started wading through all 100+ pages of the white paper published today regarding SEND reforms.
I know many of you will have been following the media reports about the proposed changes, and they’ve understandably caused concern. I’ve already had conversations with worried parents. I've not digested every word as yet but here is a snapshot of my findings and thoughts thus far.
From what I’ve read so far, yes, there are quite a few changes ahead. However, some of the rumours circulating before publication, such as removing the entire right to tribunal, have not materialised, which is at least a little reassuring. However there appears to be a lot of focus on attendance and passing tests and little regarding the theraputic provision needed to help children thrive, feel accepted and prevent burnout etc.
Some of the proposals do feel like recycled ideas from pre - 2014 when we had School Action, School Action Plus and Statements and as is typical with reforms of any kind, the paper suggests these changes will improve the system, make it fairer, and provide earlier support that isn’t dependent on a postcode lottery.
My more sceptical side wonders whether this is also about cost-saving and shifting accountability and responsibility from local authorities to schools — schools that are already underfunded, short on space, and staffed by professionals who often lack sufficient time, resources, and training to provide what the children need even if they want to. This is not about schools or teacher bashing, but more about how can they be expected to provide the level of support and understanding needed for all diagnoses and wide ranging needs, whether they are deemed complex on paper on or not!.
The paper does propose the introduction of national SEND standards, which would set out a clearer baseline of support that should be available across the country. This should help reduce the opportunity for schools and LA's to interpret guidence in a way that suits them. However, the detail of what those standards will include, and how strongly they will be enforced isn’t yet clear. The lack of enforcement of laws and policy has after all always been an issue.
There is a lot about reviewing the need for an EHCP at phased transition points such as primary to secondary. This is worrying as we know that these big transitions are the most difficult and often children need more support not less!. That said, the EHCPs have always been reviewed every year and can at any stage be taken away, what we need to know is what the new decision making will be based on.
Billions of pounds are reportedly being allocated to schools for training and to create SEND inclusion hubs. On the surface, that sounds positive. However, many of the families I support have already found the current inclusion hubs insufficient in meeting their child’s complex needs so more detail is needed to see the suitability of these hubs in meeting their vastly different needs of SEND children.
The issue of 'complexity of needs' appears frequently throughout the paper. The proposal suggests that only children with the most complex needs will be entitled to an EHCP. Below that level, would be Individual Support Plans (ISPs), which on paper sound similar to current SEN Support plans, though, on a positive note, from what I understand, they are intended to carry statutory requirements such as with EHCP's. The issue is no specific complaints procedure for when they are not enforced has been discussed, meaning we could be left with the standard schools complaints procendure we have now and we all know how that tends to go!
There are also proposals to give schools greater access to professionals such as speech and language therapists and occupational therapists to help inform these plans. Again, this sounds promising, but anyone currently waiting for an EHCP, or asking schools to make referrals because their child is struggling, will know these services are already in very limited supply.
So what can be done right now?
● Don’t panic. I know that’s easier said than done. But this is only a consultation, not law. Nothing is changing imminently, so please stay focused on your current situation and what your child is entitled to right now.
Even if these proposals are approved, laws are not rewritten overnight. Any changes would be phased in over several years. There will also still be other legal protections in place for children and young people.
●The consultation period is 12 weeks. During this time, feedback can be sent to the Department for Education, I would also encourage writing to your local MP.
Yes there is a lot of uncertainty, laws may change, SEND language and acronyms may change but what won't change is the fight we have in us to do the best for those we support.
I know this is a lengthy post, but I wanted to share some initial thoughts from the report and offer some reassurance. I'm sure however I will be commenting further on this topic!