06/02/2026
An issue that perists and requires our attention and action.
Please ask yourselves...
How much time do I spend criticizing myself? How much energy to I pour into self-correcting? How much money do I spend to fit into other people's molds?
Then ask yourselves..
Can I earn respect in other ways?
What if I redirected my time and energy into growing my skills and quieting my mind?
What if I spent my resources building my dreams, expanding my horizons, & truly enjoying my life?
Not for others, but for myself. Aligning my actions with my true self.
What could I accomplish?
How would I feel about myself?
*** *** ***
She was a British actress when she saw the Kardashians promoting weight loss lollipops to teenage girls. She called them out publicly, started a movement, and forced Instagram to change its policies.
London, 2018.
Jameela Jamil was scrolling through Instagram when she saw it: another celebrity promoting detox tea. Another appetite suppressant lollipop. Another flat tummy product marketed to millions of young followers.
She'd seen these posts countless times. Celebrities with massive platforms telling teenage girls that their bodies needed fixing, correction, optimization—and conveniently selling the products to do it.
Jameela, 32 years old and starring in the NBC comedy "The Good Place," had had enough.
She posted a response calling out the celebrities—particularly the Kardashians—for promoting these products. She didn't use diplomatic language. She called it what it was: harmful, exploitative, dangerous.
The post went viral.
Within hours, she was being praised by some and attacked by others. Celebrity fans defended their idols. The wellness industry pushed back. But something had shifted.
Jameela had named something millions of women recognized but felt powerless to challenge: the constant messaging that their bodies were problems requiring expensive solutions.
And she wasn't going to stop with one post.
Jameela knew this territory personally. As a teenager, she'd nearly died from anorexia. She'd spent years starving herself, trying to meet beauty standards promoted by the fashion industry, magazines, and celebrities.
She understood viscerally how these messages worked. How they infiltrated girls' minds. How they convinced women their bodies were public projects requiring constant improvement.
So when she saw celebrities with platforms reaching tens of millions promoting weight loss products—particularly to young, impressionable followers—she recognized it as harm dressed up as empowerment.
Within weeks of those initial callout posts, Jameela launched "I Weigh."
The movement started simply on Instagram. She posted a photo of herself and other women, but instead of listing their weight in pounds, she listed what they "weighed" in terms of accomplishments, relationships, values, experiences.
A sister. A friend. A volunteer. Someone who survived trauma. Someone who built a business. Someone who makes others laugh.
The concept was immediately viral. Women everywhere started sharing what they "weighed"—redefining worth beyond appearance.
"I Weigh" became more than a hashtag. It became a movement challenging how women measured their value.
But Jameela wasn't content with just creating an alternative narrative. She wanted to change the systems promoting harmful ones.
She began systematically calling out celebrities who promoted diet products. Kim Kardashian selling appetite suppressants. Cardi B promoting detox teas. Any influencer hawking weight loss shakes to young audiences.
Her argument was clear: when you have a platform reaching millions of young girls, promoting products that prey on body insecurity is harmful. It's not entrepreneurship. It's exploitation.
The backlash was immediate and intense. Fans accused her of jealousy. The wellness industry claimed she was anti-business. Some said she was being too harsh, too judgmental.
Jameela didn't back down.
She exposed how unequal this conditioning was. One group—primarily girls and women—learns self-monitoring. The other learns self-direction. One learns correction. The other learns momentum.
This imbalance has consequences.
When women are taught to treat their bodies as public projects requiring constant improvement, attention is diverted from power. Time is lost to self-regulation. Confidence is taxed by constant evaluation. Energy that could fuel ambition is spent on containment.
The system benefits from this distraction.
Because a person busy apologizing for existing is less likely to challenge authority. Less likely to demand space. Less likely to lead without hesitation.
Jameela's clarity cut through wellness language and self-improvement rhetoric. This wasn't about confidence tips or self-love slogans. It was about how ambition is unevenly distributed before anyone ever chooses it.
What would shift, she asked, if girls were taught to inhabit their bodies the way boys are taught to use theirs?
If girls learned their bodies were tools for doing things rather than projects requiring correction?
If energy spent on appearance anxiety was redirected toward building skills, taking risks, demanding power?
In 2019, Jameela took her activism directly to Instagram itself.
She publicly advocated for the platform to restrict weight loss product advertising—particularly content targeting young users. She pointed out that allowing celebrities to promote appetite suppressants and detox teas to teenagers was enabling harm at scale.
Instagram listened.
In September 2019, the platform announced new policies: they would ban certain diet product advertisements to users under 18. They would remove posts promoting weight loss products that included incentives to buy or strong weight loss claims.
It wasn't everything Jameela wanted, but it was measurable change.
A platform with over a billion users had altered its policies partly because one woman refused to stay quiet about harm she saw being normalized.
"I Weigh" expanded beyond Instagram. Jameela launched a podcast exploring mental health, body image, and systemic issues affecting women. She brought on guests discussing eating disorders, diet culture, mental health treatment, and structural inequality.
The movement created community. Women shared stories of recovering from eating disorders. Of rejecting diet culture. Of redirecting energy from appearance anxiety toward actual goals.
But Jameela continued facing criticism. Some accused her of being performative. Others questioned details of stories she'd shared about her past. She was called too aggressive, too confrontational, too unwilling to let celebrities make money however they wanted.
She addressed criticisms directly, defended herself when needed, and kept working.
Because the core issue remained: billion-dollar industries profit from women's insecurity. Celebrities with massive platforms amplify those messages. Young girls internalize them before they're old enough to recognize the manipulation.
Jameela's activism exposed the mechanism plainly: when girls are taught from childhood that their bodies need constant monitoring, improvement, and correction, they learn to direct energy inward rather than outward.
They learn self-regulation instead of self-direction. They learn to shrink rather than expand. They learn to apologize for space rather than claim it.
This conditioning has measurable consequences. Women spend billions annually on diet products, cosmetic procedures, and wellness programs. They spend countless hours worrying about appearance. They limit ambitions to fit acceptable femininity.
Meanwhile, boys are generally taught their bodies are tools for doing things. For sports, for building, for action. Not projects requiring endless correction.
That differential conditioning creates differential outcomes.
Jameela continues this work today. "I Weigh" remains active. She still calls out harmful celebrity endorsements. She advocates for body neutrality—not requiring people to love their bodies, but freeing them from constant body monitoring.
She's spoken about how this activism has affected her career. Some opportunities disappeared because she was "controversial." Some people in entertainment wanted her to be quieter, more agreeable, less confrontational.
She chose activism over comfort.
At 38, Jameela Jamil remains one of the most visible voices challenging diet culture and the wellness industry's exploitation of female insecurity.
She forced Instagram to change policies affecting billions of users.
She created a movement redefining how women measure their worth.
She consistently exposes how body monitoring drains energy from ambition.
And she asks the question that makes systems uncomfortable: What would women accomplish if energy spent on appearance anxiety was redirected toward building power?
In 2018, Jameela saw celebrities promoting harmful products to young girls. She could have stayed quiet. Could have focused on her acting career. Could have avoided controversy.
Instead, she called them out. Started a movement. Changed platform policies. And kept fighting even when the backlash was intense.
She proved that one person refusing to accept normalized harm can create measurable change.
She showed that calling out exploitation—even when it's profitable and popular—matters.
She demonstrated that activism doesn't require perfect credentials. It requires recognizing harm and refusing to stay silent about it.
Jameela Jamil saw the Kardashians selling appetite suppressants to teenagers. She said it was wrong. She built a movement. She changed Instagram's policies.
And she keeps asking: What would shift if girls were taught to inhabit their bodies the way boys are taught to use theirs?
That question still doesn't have an answer.
But because Jameela asked it publicly and repeatedly, millions of women are starting to question the conditioning they absorbed.
And questioning is the first step toward rejecting it.
*** *** ***
