Alliance for the Access to essential medicine in Odisha.

Alliance for the Access to essential medicine in Odisha. Addressing right to health by promoting greater government accountability fr safeguarding people's Right to Access to Essential Medicines.

03/06/2017
08/04/2015

Drugmakers keen to blow the whistle on spurious trade

Spurious drugs result in murder most foul, says Novartis head in India, Mr Ranjit Shahani, welcoming the Union Health Minister Mr Ghulam Nabi Azad�s recent statement in Parliament on a �whistleblower scheme� to reward tip-offs on such medicines. 0 0Google +0 0 Mumbai, July 28 Spurious drugs result in murder most foul, says Novartis head in India, Mr Ranjit Shahani, welcoming the Union Health Minister Mr Ghulam Nabi Azad�s recent statement in Parliament on a �whistleblower scheme� to reward tip-offs on such medicines. Last week, Mr Azad proposed rewards of Rs 2 lakh to Rs 20 lakh for information on the manufacture of spurious drugs. It would encourage locals and labourers to come forward with information, he had told the Rajya Sabha. Issue back on centre-stage The proposal has not been discussed with the pharmaceutical industry, but representatives are happy the issue is back on centre-stage after a gap of about five years. Done with a profit motive, counterfeit drugs cause a �perfect murder�, observes Mr Shahani, where �you take the pill � the evidence disappears and you die of the disease and not the medicine.� Lauding the �creative� suggestion to reward the informer, he however points out the need to keep the identity of the whistleblower confidential as in the case of the income-taxinformant-cum-whistleblower to help unearth tax evasions. Fear of threats But will people come forward despite fears of threats from the mafias operating in this segment? �History shows that by and large informers are able to steer clear of trouble. Some incidents indeed would take place but one would rather prefer this risk than allow millions of gullible patients to suffer at the hands of drugs mafia,� says Mr Harinder Sikka of Piramal Healthcare . Mr Sikka, in his personal capacity, had filed a public interest litigation in Delhi High Court in 2007, asking the Centre to implement the Mashelkar Committee report (2003) on the issue. The whistleblower scheme will put fear in the minds of those who have �been enjoying their extended honeymoon with regard to rampant trade in fake drugs�, Mr Sikka says. Ending a menace �The manufacturers will have to exercise extreme caution, as the reward is large enough to encourage insiders to blow the lid,� he adds. By cleansing the system of fake drugs, the Centre will address a menace that has caused harm to patients, hurt importers, exporters and genuine manufacturers, he says. India still does not have an official estimate on the prevalence of spurious drugs, and priority on the issue has swung from high to being put on the backburner. The initial call for death penalty for spurious drug makers has been given a silent burial. The penalty now is life imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh. As fake-drug makers end up tarring the entire pharma industry, all sections of the industry have welcomed initiatives to end the problem. The only concern as expressed by the Indian Drug Manufacturers� Association�s Mr Daara Patel, on behalf of small and medium drug-makers, is that genuine drug makers should not inadvertently get caught in the net that is cast for spurious drug makers. Taken from Business Line thehindubusinessline.in

Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/drugmakers-keen-to-blowwhistlespurious-trade_408517.html?utm_source=ref_article

Govt to link healthcare schemes with Jan Dhan: Jaitley Under the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme, subsidy amount is...
08/04/2015

Govt to link healthcare schemes with Jan Dhan: Jaitley

Under the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme, subsidy amount is directly credited into bank accounts of consumers even as they pay full amount for LPG cylinder at the time of purchase.

The PMJDY was launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in August last year. 0 0Google +0 0 The government is working to provide healthcare schemes to poor people under the Jan Dhan initiative, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Wednesday. Under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), the flagship financial inclusion programme of the NDA government, 14 crore bank accounts have already been opened with over Rs 14,000 crore coming in as deposits. "Agle daur mein, is garib varg tak swasth ki yojana kaise pahuch sake, uss disha mein humlog kaam kar rehen hai". (We are working on providing the poor people benefits of healthcare schemes (under Jan Dhan) in the next phase)," Jaitley said. With the opening of accounts under the Jan Dhan scheme, he said, "The poor (people) of the country now have access to bank accounts. We are now trying to put some money in those bank accounts. Through the DBT, crores of people will get money into their bank accounts." He said besides Rs 1 lakh accident insurance cover and Rs 30,000 life cover, the Jan Dhan accounts would be linked to pension schemes. Under the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme, subsidy amount is directly credited into bank accounts of consumers even as they pay full amount for LPG cylinder at the time of purchase. The PMJDY was launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in August last year. The banks were asked to open at least one account of an adult member in every household. There are various benefits through PMJDY like RuPay Debit Cards with Rs 1 lakh accidental insurance to all account holders. An overdraft of Rs 5,000 to one member of family, preferably a woman, will also be provided after observing satisfactory transactions in the account for six months.

Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/govt-to-link-healthcare-schemesjan-dhan-jaitley_1351896.html?utm_source=ref_article

Under the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme, subsidy amount is directly credited into bank accounts of consumers even as they pay full amount for LPG cylinder at the time of purchase. The PMJDY was launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in August last year. ..

Govt allows pharma cos to hike rates of 509 essential drugs The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has iss...
08/04/2015

Govt allows pharma cos to hike rates of 509 essential drugs

The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has issued a notification for price hike of drugs in line with the wholesale price index of 2014 under Drug Price Control Order, 2013.
The government has allowed pharmaceutical companies to hike rates of 509 essential medicines used for treating various ailments like diabetes, hepatitis and cancer by 3.84 per cent with effect from April 1.
The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has issued a notification for price hike of drugs in line with the wholesale price index of 2014 under Drug Price Control Order, 2013. "As confirmed by the economic adviser (Minister of Commerce and Industry), the annual increase in the wholesale price index (WPI) works out at 3.84 per cent during calender year 2014 over the corresponding period in 2013," NPPA said in a notification.
The 509 medicines which have become costlier include Alpha Interferon injection used to treat hepatitis B and C as well as certain types of cancer, carboplatin injection used for cancer treatment, fluconazole capsules indicated for fungal infections, among others. Welcoming the decision, Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA) Secretary General D G Shah told Media: "It is a part of the policy. Pharmaceutical companies don't get a chance to hike prices (more than once) a year. This price hike is linked to inflation." Prices of condoms, which are also part of the list of essential medicines, have also gone up due to cost revision. According to the notification, antibiotics which have Amoxicillin capsules have also become costlier with effect from April 1.
At present, the government caps prices of a total of 348 essential medicines based on the simple average of all medicines in a particular therapeutic segment with sales of more than 1 per cent. Besides, the government regulates prices of all other medicines and companies are allowed to hike prices of such drugs by only up to 10 per cent in a year. The government had notified DPCO, 2013, which covers 680 formulations, with effect from May 15, 2014, replacing the 1995 order that regulated prices of only 74 bulk drugs.

Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/govt-allows-pharma-cos-to-hike-rates509-essential-drugs_1351943.html?utm_source=ref_article

The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has issued a notification for price hike of drugs in line with the wholesale price index of 2014 under Drug Price Control Order, 2013...

06/04/2015

Do you really need that test?
ShareCommentTo get such articles in your inbox

January 05, 2015 11:25 IST
With attractive health check-up packages and a growing trend of over-investigation, one needs to be cautious while going for such diagnostic tests.

Twenty-eight-year-old Ridhima Sen (name changed) had been suffering from intense pain in her lower back for days and when the doctor she consulted at a private hospital in Delhi asked her to undergo a battery of tests to find out if she had stones in her kidney, she did so without thinking twice. But when she consulted her family physician back home in Kolkata and a doctor at Safdarjung Hospital, she was told that at least one of those tests was quite unnecessary, and that even the diagnosis may have exaggerated the condition.

"At that time, I was so worried I did not think too much about it even though each test cost a couple of thousands (of rupees) but the doctor at the private hospital kept asking me to do more and more tests," Sen says.

Unfortunately, such incidents of "overdiagnosis" are not rare.

Last year, an Australian doctor, David Berger, who had volunteered at a hospital in Himachal Pradesh, had written in a powerful article in British Medical Journal: "I saw one patient with no apparent structural heart disease and uncomplicated essential hypertension who had been followed up by a city cardiologist with an echocardiogram every three months, a totally unnecessary investigation.

A senior doctor in another hospital a couple of hours away was renowned for using ultrasonography as a profligate, revenue earning procedure, charging desperately poor people Rs 1,000 each time."

Berger added that everyone who works in healthcare in India knew that these practices are widespread.

The corruption in our healthcare system is one reason for this, where doctors receive kickbacks for each diagnostic test they prescribe, says Samiran Nundy, who heads the department of surgical gastroenterology at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital in Delhi.

"The lack of knowledge about the value of each diagnostic test, whether it will enhance the diagnosis, and protection against lawsuits by patients are the other reasons for overdiagnosis," adds Nundy, one of the senior doctors who had spoken out against corruption in the system after Berger's article, and had himself written about it in the journal, Current Medicine Research and Practice.

"Kickbacks for specialist referrals, investigations, and prescribing specific brands of drugs has become extremely common in medical practice in India... Kickbacks also provide a perverse incentive to doctors to investigate more and prescribe more, all of which may be unnecessary," says Anita Jain, doctor and India editor of British Medical Journal.

These include echocardiograms and treadmill tests and one opts for it, thinking there could be no harm.

The argument seems to be: We check our cars regularly, so why shouldn't we also check our bodies so that we can find and treat abnormalities before they cause too much harm? It seems so easy, but the human body is not a car, and, in contrast to a car, it has self-healing properties," Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jorgensen and Lasse T Krogsboll of the Nordic Cochrane Centre had written in their article General health checks don't work in British Medical Journal.

Randomised trials are necessary to find out whether screening does more good than harm before we decide whether to introduce it, they had underlined.

Nundy, too, emphasises that annual checkups are "completely useless".

"There have been two studies on this, one from America and one from Canada, and they found that they (checkups) are worthwhile only if they are targeted -- for instance, if you have a very strong family history of cancer of the colon, then it's worthwhile to get a colonoscopy done every two years. Or if you are a heavy smoker, you can get a chest x-ray done.

"But for a person who is hale and hearty and has no symptoms, there is no need for an annual checkup," he says.

Jain adds that disease definitions are also being expanded "such that there are now conditions such as pre-hypertension, pre-diabetes and pre-osteoporosis.

"The evidence on future risk with these is lacking, yet, once a person has parameters that are slightly off the normal range, they may worry about it.

"Also, the doctor may try to correct these parameters once a person is labelled so."

One heartening response to this growing malaise has been the formation of the Society for Less Investigative Medicine by some concerned doctors at All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

Starting with the cardiology department, the body aims to sensitise patients about tests and promote evidence-based use of investigations, among others.

Balram Bhargava, one of the founders had said in an interview soon after it was launched that while testing for risk factors such as diabetes, blood pressure or cholestrol should be done, "routine testing every year -- doing a treadmill test or a coronary CT -- has not shown to be beneficial at all."

(Bhargava had not responded to queries at the time of going to press).

But this may just be a drop in the ocean.

Keep in mind:

Tests must be done on a case-by-case basis. Opt for a medical test if you are in that specific risk group, or have a family history of a disease, and after consulting a doctor you trust.
Annual medical checkups, such as treadmill tests, are unnecessary for a healthy individual.
Unnecessary checkups could lead to false positives, over-investigation and anxiety for the patient, apart from the expense.
Many tests also have side-effects. CT scans, for instance, involve a lot of radiation.

06/04/2015

Shocking! What some doctors will do for money!
March 31, 2015 09:51 IST

'Can we forgive the pathologist who wrongly labelled a healthy person as a diabetic patient for receiving the favour of the referring physician and possibly for a few thousand rupees?'

'The delinquent homeopath who caused a cataract in a child by giving terribly wrong drug must go to jail.'

'How can we permit a gynaecologist to practice her/his specialty if s/he tinkers with the faith of the patient in an abhorrent way?'

'Paying money does not guarantee good healthcare. The private healthcare system largely treats patients as revenue generators,' crusading doctor Dr Arun Gadre tells Dr K S Parthasarathy.

We know that some medical policies and many medical practices in India are deeply flawed. We have heard of 'widespread examples of irrational drug prescribing, kickbacks for referrals, and unnecessary investigations and surgical procedures.'

However, the details revealed by Dr Arun Gadre, a gynaecologist from Maharashtra, in the British Medical Journal after interviewing 78 doctors from across India is very disturbing, shameful, and distressing.

The 'Personal View' in the journal reflects the conclusions in his Marathi book, Kaifiyat -- Pramanik Doctoranchi (Reflections by Sincere Doctors) based on the testimonies of these doctors.

This book went into two editions (September 2014 and October 2014). Dr Gadre may publish an English version shortly.

The book lists many malpractices. Some doctors get Rs 30,000 to Rs 40,000 for referring patients for angioplasty. Of the 150 doctors contacted, only three were willing to refer patients without kickbacks.

Another diabolic practice is followed by some gynaecologists. They perform ultrasounds without indications in pregnant women who complain of trivial abdominal pain, then fabricate false reports of cervical abnormalities and advice the women to have cervical stitches, with the pretext of preventing miscarriage!

Patients seldom go for a second opinion. The delinquent doctor does not give them any documents to avoid being found out.

Another tragic example is that of homeopaths who give little girls corticosteroids for red eyes; long term use lead to cataracts that required surgery.

Over prescription of a battery of tests is very common even when there is no suspicion of pathology. A shocking practice was what a pathologist referred to as the 'sink test'.

"Only a few of the tests are performed, and the extra blood collected is dumped in the sink. Fabricated results are given in the normal range for all tests that were not performed. The patient pays a large sum, which is shared by the referring doctor and the pathologist," Dr Gadre discovered.

In Maharashtra, many homeopaths and doctors trained in Ayurveda practice allopathy with the cursory knowledge imparted by medical representatives.

A few years ago I discovered that the young physicians taking care of heart patients in an ICU in Navi Mumbai were all fresh graduates in Ayurveda. Then they were working for a pittance; once their 'training' in such a hospital is over they can go back to locations outside the city and carry on allopathic practice legally.

Some pathologists label healthy persons as diabetic patients making them dependent on the referring doctor for life!

"These interviews indicated the alarming extent of the deterioration of rationality and ethics in India's private medical sector and the need for stringent, transparent, and mandatory regulation," Dr Gadre warned.

"These interviews underscore one fact -- paying money does not guarantee good healthcare. The private healthcare system largely treats patients as revenue generators, without rationality or medical logic," he added.

While the degrading depravity of the delinquent doctors cannot simply be considered as ethical aberrations, there is a silver lining; 36 interviewees who described the malpractices were willing to declare their names along with their statements.

One legitimate criticism of Dr Gadre's article is that he did not suggest clear solutions to the questions raised by him.

He quoted the suggestions of some interviewees that the commercial transaction between patients and doctors must be severed. He did not explain how we can achieve this.

He also proposed that the only solution for India would be accountable social regulation of the private medical sector and the movement towards a combination of social insurance and a tax based system for universal healthcare. Again, he did not explain the fine print in these suggestions. He should have elaborated possible solutions in the BMJ article.

"We are coming out with solutions in the form of a universal health care document soon. In a further edition, my colleague Dr Abhay Shukla is adding an entire part on all possible, short and long term solutions," Dr Gadre clarified in his e-mailed response to me.

"Regarding your query regarding practicing doctors lending a hand to take the guilty to court, the answer is no. I am sure that no one will come forward. And personally I am of the opinion that the government must take that job," Dr Gadre said.

"An effective regulation framework must be implemented on the ground with no opportunity for government bureaucrats to use it for taking bribes," he added.

"For that some kind of social accountability mechanism needs to be brought in the structure of the act itself," Dr Gadre said. "We have already prepared a draft of such a modified act with help of legal experts."

I believe that by fixing charges for medical imaging like a CT scan, angiography and MRI and medical and surgical procedures by appropriate legislation we may be able to discipline some delinquent specialists. Let us hope that the proposed legislation will cover these items as well.

In a telephone interview, Dr Gadre hinted that there are plans to start a national movement to break the cozy relationship between physicians and commercial interests. The fact that Dr Gadre could gather support from so many zealous interviewees nationwide augers well for such a programme.

I suggested to Dr Gadre that in the next edition of his book, he must illustrate the malpractices with the possible punishments under the existing Criminal Procedure Code. Because of his sincerity and commitment Dr Gadre may be able to secure free support of the best legal brains in the country to carry out this task.

The delinquent homeopath who caused a cataract in a child by giving terribly wrong drug must go to jail.

Similarly, how can we permit a gynaecologist to practice her/his specialty if s/he tinkers with the faith of the patient in such an abhorrent way?

Can we forgive the pathologist who wrongly labelled a healthy person as a diabetic patient for receiving the favour of the referring physician and possibly for a few thousand rupees?

Many young physicians are conscientious. They have themselves started raising their voices against malpractices. Dr Gadre's article may hopefully trigger social awareness to check medical corruption.

Dr K S Parthasarathy is a former secretary of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.

30/03/2015

India's free medicine scheme to benefit millions

From city hospitals to tiny rural clinics, India's public doctors will soon be able to prescribe free generic drugs to all comers, vastly expanding access to medicine in a country where public spending on health was just $4.50 per person last year. The plan was quietly adopted last year, but not publicized. Initial funding has been allocated in recent weeks, officials said.

India has put in place a $5.4- billion policy to provide free medicine to its people, a decision that could change the lives of hundreds of millions, but a ban on branded drugs stands to cut Big Pharma out of the windfall.

From city hospitals to tiny rural clinics, India's public doctors will soon be able to prescribe free generic drugs to all comers, vastly expanding access to medicine in a country where public spending on health was just $4.50 per person last year.

The plan was quietly adopted last year but not publicized. Initial funding has been allocated in recent weeks, officials said.

Under the plan, doctors will be limited to a generics-only drug list and face punishment for prescribing branded medicines, a major disadvantage for pharmaceutical giants in one of the world's fastest-growing drug markets.

"Without a doubt, it is a considerable blow to an already beleaguered industry, recently the subject of several disadvantageous decisions in India," said KPMG partner Chris Stirling, who is European head of Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals.

"Pharmaceutical firms will likely rethink their emerging markets strategies carefully to take account of this development, and any similar copycat moves across other geographies," he added.

But the initiative would overhaul a system where healthcare is often a luxury and private clinics account for four times as much spending as state hospitals, despite 40 percent of the people living below the poverty line, or $1.25 a day or less.

Within five years, up to half of India's 1.2 billion people are likely to take advantage of the scheme, the government says. Others are likely to continue visiting private hospitals and clinics, where the scheme will not operate.

"The policy of the government is to promote greater and rational use of generic medicines that are of standard quality," said L.C. Goyal, additional secretary at the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and a key proponent of the policy.

"They are much, much cheaper than the branded ones."

Global drug makers like Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck will be hit. They spend billions of dollars a year researching new treatments and target huge growth for branded medicine in emerging economies such as India, where generics account for around 90 percent of drug sales by value, far more than in developed countries.

US-based Abbott Labo-ratories, which bought an Indian generics maker in 2010, is the biggest seller of drugs, both branded and generic, in India, followed by GlaxoSmithKline.

Big Pharma blues

In March, India granted its first ever compulsory license, allowing a domestic drug maker to manufacture a copy-cat version of Nexavar, a cancer drug developed by Germany's Bayer, unnerving foreign drug makers that fear a lack of intellectual property protection in emerging markets.

That enabled India's Natco Pharma to sell its generic version of Nexavar at Rs. 8,800 per monthly dose, a fraction of the Rs. 280,000 Bayer's version cost.

In another blow to Big Pharma's emerging market ambitions, China recently overhauled regulations to grant authorities the power to allow domestic drug makers to produce cheap copies of medicines protected by patents.

Emerging markets are on track to make up 28 percent of global pharmaceuticals sales by 2015, up from 12 percent in 2005, according to IMS Health, a healthcare information and services company.

Most sales in emerging markets come from branded generics, which off-patent drugs priced at a premium to those are made by local manufacturers.

The Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI), a lobby group for multinational drug makers in the country, argues that the price of drugs is just one factor in access to healthcare and that the scheme need not be detrimental to manufacturers of branded drugs.

"I think this will hasten overall growth of the pharmaceutical industry, as poor patients who could not afford will now have access to essential medicines," said Tapan Ray, director general of OPPI.

About Rs. 600 billion worth of drugs are sold each year in India, or Rs. 482 billion at wholesale. Drugs covered under the new policy account for about 60 percent of existing sales, or Rs. 290 billion at wholesale cost.

The government's annual cost is likely to be lower due to bulk purchasing and because patients at private clinics would still pay for their own drugs. States will pay for 25 percent of the free drugs and the Central government will cover the rest.

Under various existing programs, around 250 million people, or less than a quarter of India's population, now receive free medicines, according to the Health Ministry.

India's new policy, to be implemented by the end of 2012 and rolled out nationwide within two years, is expected to provide 52 percent of the population with free drugs by April 2017, at a cumulative cost of Rs. 300 billion.

That requires a major funding ramp-up from a deficit-strapped government. The scheme has been granted just Rs. 1 billion thus far from central government coffers.

Strict instructions

Public doctors will be able to spend 5 percent of the budget, equivalent to around $50 million a year, on drugs outside of the government's list, on branded drugs or on medicines that are not on the list. Beyond that, they can be punished, said Goyal, the health Ministry official.

"If doctors are found to be prescribing medicines, which are not on the list, or which is branded, then disciplinary action will be initiated," he said.

Free medicine is just one solution to better healthcare in India, where just getting to a state clinic can require a long journey.

Swapnil Yadav, who runs a clinic in Ambegaon, a village 170 km southeast of Mumbai, said India should set up free drug retailers instead of government clinics.

"Patients can approach a private clinic and then get free medicines from government-run medicine shops," he said.

The free generics scheme, which mirrors policies in the states of Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, is expected to be fully operational by the time voters go to the polls for the 2014 General Election, when the populist Congress Party will seek a third straight victory.

Indian makers of generics such as Dr. Reddy's and Cipla are best placed to benefit.

"The move will please the generics manufacturers who stand to gain substantially in competing for contracts," said KPMG's Stirling.

27/03/2015

Exclusive - Modi government puts brakes on India's universal health plan
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has asked for a drastic cutback of an ambitious health care plan after cost estimates came in at $18.5 billion over five years, several government sources said, delaying a promise made in his election manifesto.

Modi has had to make difficult choices to boost economic growth - his government's first full annual budget, announced last month, ramped up infrastructure spending, leaving less federal funding immediately available for social sectors.

The health ministry developed a draft policy on universal health care in coordination with the prime minister's office last year. The National Health Assurance Mission aims to provide free drugs, diagnostic services and insurance for serious ailments for India's 1.2 billion people.

The health ministry proposed rolling out the system from April 2015, and in October projected its cost as $25.5 billion over four years. By the time the project was presented to Modi in January the costs had been pared to 1.16 trillion rupees ($18.5 billion) over five years.

That was still too much. The programme was not approved, three health ministry officials and two other government sources told Reuters. Three officials said the health ministry has been asked to revamp the policy, but work is yet to start.

"The constraint on India's financial resources was conveyed to health officials, and even to those from other ministries," said one government official who is not from the health ministry but attended the meeting where Modi was present.

The meeting was held in January and the discussions were not made public. All of the sources declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the discussions.

Officials at the prime minister's office and the finance ministry, as well as the health ministry, did not respond to requests seeking comment.

Modi's manifesto ahead of the election that brought him to power last year accorded "high priority" to the health sector and promised a universal health assurance plan. The manifesto said previous public health schemes, that have been mired in payment delays recently, had failed to meet the growing medical needs of public.

ndia's Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses Sri Lanka's parliament in Colombo© REUTERS/Dinuka Liyanawatte ndia's Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses Sri Lanka's parliament in Colombo
Modi has another four years left in his first term to fulfil the promise.

India currently spends about 1 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on public health, but the badly-managed public health system means funds are not fully utilised. A health ministry vision document in December proposed raising spending to 2.5 percent of GDP but did not specify a time period.

So health experts were dismayed when the federal budget for the full-year starting April raised the allocation for the country's main health department only by about 2 percent from the previous year, less than inflation. The meagre increase dimmed prospects for the massive health plan, they said.

Indian gynaecologists conduct ultrasound examinations on pregnant women at a government-run hospital in the northeastern Indian city of Agartala© REUTERS/Jayanta Dey Indian gynaecologists conduct ultrasound examinations on pregnant women at a government-run hospital in the northeastern Indian city of Agartala
"How can it happen when you have truncated resources?" one health ministry official asked.

REWORK, DISAPPOINTMENT

The health plan was drafted in consultation with Modi's office and an expert panel, including an expert from the World Bank. The proposal included insurance to cover more expensive and serious ailments such as heart surgeries or organ failure.

Two government officials said this benefit will be withdrawn. The health ministry was also asked why the new plan could not be simply combined with existing health schemes.

The decision to slash the level of insurance coverage will have an impact on India's thriving private health sector, which would have seen huge business growth as the programme channelled millions of new patients into private hospitals.

Currently only 17 percent of India's population has some form of health insurance.

Anjan Bose of NATHEALTH, a group that represents such private firms, said the delays in the programme would disappoint both the industry and the public.

"Greater availability of funds for public health care under this programme would have further boosted growth of the private medical industry," Bose said.

(Additional reporting by Frank Jack Daniel, Editing by Frank Jack Daniel and Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Address

Bhubaneswar
751003

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Alliance for the Access to essential medicine in Odisha. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Alliance for the Access to essential medicine in Odisha.:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram