12/05/2023
While Explaining difference between Homeopathy, Allopathy and Ayurveda I commented in one group as below, Sharing here for all Curious and Skeptics, It's best explaination based on my knowledge
-----------------------------
Thank you for your appreciation sir, But I prefer to differ with you. There is major difference between Allopathy and Homeopathy. Allopathic approach is tissue base approach. Means if you correct part (Or parts) then whole organism will be corrected. Their focus is cellular base. Their medicine is based on particular part's disease. But Homeopathy says If you correct organism then it'll take care of it's part. Hence in Homeopathy we gave main importance to Individual's characteristics and in allopathy they give importance to disease diagnosis. Disease diagnosis is important in every field to know prognosis. But treatment in allopathy is based on diagnosis of disease and it's modification according to Individual's expression of disease. But in Homeopathy treatment is based on characteristics of person and it's modification is on disease if required. These approaches are exact opposite. But if you think inclusively then you may say both cover patient by different approaches and will benefit more than independent practices.
In Ayurveda approach is like Homeopathy, i.e. wholistic (They don't treat any patient unless take consideration of it's "Prakruti- Vaat/Pitta/Kafa- Where they also take mental symptoms like irritation and laziness etc. Conclusion might be differentbut approach of finding origin of all numerous diseases to eradicate totally is quite same Like homoeopathic miasm) but practice of Ayurveda is like allopathy i.e. disease based and acts by directly acting on disease by medicinal molecules.
The origin of disease is what main concern is in treatment of patient to heal patient totally without leaving traces of disease behind and avoid recurrences if possible. Allopathy find it's root in cellular level and outside of body. But Ayurved and Homeopathy says if our internal environment is strong and we take care properly then no external force can produce disease within us. e.g. Getting infected by bacteria and virus is different and falling ill-developing disease is different. Why many people are just carriers? And Why some die due to same virus is still dark place for Allopathy. And they have no means to strengthen internal environment which scientists call homeostasis (immunity is also part of it, I guess) and Homeopathy says Vital force. In Allopathy giving multivitamins are only way they can find. It'll correct deficiency but reversing of disease process is still out of understanding of Allopaths and Modern Scientists. Microscope helped a lot but it deviated focus from whole person to cells. Cells are important but human is not just addition of cells, it's very strictly operated system by cells, And by order of brain cells may do su***de i.e. apoptosis (cell die willingly by the order of brain which lack in malignant cells).
Homoeopathy sees disease far more than which appear on cellular level. It says whatever you see by naked eye or under microscope are not disease but it's products it's sign. Actual disease is not physical entity (Here many says Homoeopathy claim disease are spiritual but I prefer not to name as spiritual, Let it be unnamed till find appropriate term) Actual disease is what you can not see but can collectively group it by all signs and symptoms (including mental and physical both) and correcting these signs and symptoms by reverse order is actual reversing the process, if we can set this reversal then body can heal itself. Hence Hering's law of cure and Kent's 12 observation I find very important in assessing effect of medicine and taking decisions in treatment to change or to keep or give placebo till complete action of medicine and wait. These 2 parameters are very important in follow ups. For this Homeopathy brought one method which is actual controversial. To treat non-material disease Homeopathy went non-material to avoid side effects, in it's dilutions. And by this *Homeopaths claim that their medicines have no side effect and allopaths claim that Homeopathic medicines have no effect as there is no molecule in it* But both are wrong Homeopathic medicine have effect and side effects both by it's own way. Like Allopathic doctor always think about Liver and Kidney status before prescribing medicine as these are main to destruct and excrete molecules and get affected by it. Which not in case of Homeopathic medicine it has no molecules but it's influence and hence no side effect but influence on disease process. What can be went wrong i.e. side effect of homoeopathic drug, if anyone really wants to know then he has to read Kent's 12 observations. Dr. Hering & Dr. Kent already noted down observations after administration of Homeopathic drugs in patient. And when he says change the drug is actual drug shown it's side effect in that patient it doesn't match properly. But to achieve this you have to give it very precisely else Homeopathy will not work it'll be just placebo. Hence every *Successful* Homeopathic practitioner is actual super consultant in himself I it's success rate is more than 70-80% of his all cases. Hence I always wonder and salute every Homeopathic achievement as it awakes my curiosity, How? How medicine acted as there is no molecule in it. Just awesome, Just wonderful. But if someone comes and ask me to explain this phenomenon, Then I felt helpless, Here I can not explain anything nor but challenging who do not believe in it and skeptics to give Homoeopathic medicine *according Homeopathic way not allopathic way* and see if it acts or not. You can not prove Homeopathic medicine but principles. As there is no specific medicine for specific disease, it's approach is based on individualization. So you have to treat patient by Homeopathic way and see it's success. Then and then only you can find it is much better than placebo, This is my point. You can not pick one medicine of insomnia and generally give everyone, it'll fail. And it will not be considered by me as Homeopathy failed but your understanding failed. As I witnessed result by Homoeopathic medicine which can not be claimed as Placebo effect. Hence I say Newtonian physics may not able to explain homoeopathic medicinal effect, might be Quantum physics will be able. Here they blame that it's cult and talk like devotees that every new research is already in our sacred text. But I won't blame them because they didn't experienced it. I am firm and keeping my rational image on stake for Homeopathy as I evident it.
Allopathy developed it's system of treating of patient where Homeopaths failed to do as treating patient by Homeopathy is more art than just science. There are many method developed, but I want it to rationalized or take proper dietary and habitual changes. Because reversing process can not merely done by medicines but creating environment around. But that's different topic of discussion. For now I just stop here with discussion of differences of different faculties in treatment of patient.
I do not claim anything superior to other but differentiating each other for better understanding and treating accordingly and easy to collaborate if possible.
- Dr. Kaustubh Kalpana Vilas (Burde)
