Scuola Specializzazione in Psicoterapia a orientamento etnopsicoterapeutico

  • Casa
  • Italia
  • Calambrone
  • Scuola Specializzazione in Psicoterapia a orientamento etnopsicoterapeutico

Scuola di specializzazione in Psicoterapia (indirizzo psicodinamico, orientamento etnopsicoterapeutico)

Sede didattica: Fondazione “Stella Maris” viale Tirreno 331 – Calambrone, Pisa

Direttore: Piero Coppo

Comitato scientifico: Mario Rossi Monti (Presidente), Laura Faranda, Carlo Maci, Lelia Pisani, Francesca Vallarino Gancia.

22/04/2026

Psychology is often presented as objective, neutral, and universal. But most “standard” psychology emerged in Euro-American contexts and continues to dominate globally, even where social realities are very different. This creates a mismatch between imported Western theories and lived experiences in newly independent nations, where people do not necessarily think, feel, or relate in the same ways.

Even after political independence, Western-centered hegemonic psychologies continue to prevail. Institutions in former colonies still promote the former colonizer and subjugate local ways of knowing and being. Indigenous Psychology responds to this by building locally grounded theories. It focuses on relational and contextual patterns of life, instead of reducing people to abstract, decontextualised individuals.

The problem is not just theory but method. What gets studied, how it is studied, and who gets to publish are shaped by power. Research methods themselves are embedded in cultural and political contexts. Western psychology is built on weak ties, where relationships are flexible and individual. Many communities live through strong ties, where identity is deeply rooted in family, land, and interdependence.

Examples:
The Orang Asli (“original people” in Malay) are the earliest inhabitants of Peninsular Malaysia. For the Orang Asli, land is not a resource but identity. Displacement produces ecological grief, a form of distress tied to loss of land, culture, and ways of life, not just individual pathology.

Another example is of the Chinese concept of Xin often translated as “heart.” which also challenges psychology. Mind, body, emotion, and morality are not separate but interconnected, making distress relational rather than located inside an isolated individual.

Read more on Xin and Orang Asli here: hrtps://madinsouthasia.org/is-psychology-same-for-all/

[Psychology, psychiatry, psychiatrist, science, psychiatric drug, medication, schizophrenia, depression, mad studies, mad in South asia, madness, mad stories]

18/04/2026

"It is impossible to be healthy under capitalism. Removing the social sources of sickness is not an option under capitalism because it would interrupt the flow of profit." Professor of Medical Psychology Susan Rosenthal's penetrating analysis of the social determinants for mental health and illness, and the relationship between Marxism and psychology.

"Marx and Engels described Capital as a relationship and capitalism as a system of relationships. Did they mean that every aspect of our relations with ourselves, others, and society is shaped by capitalism, so that a socialist revolution would transform all of these relationships? Or were they being too general? Are some aspects of human experience unaffected by society, so that we need something other than marxism to understand them and something more than socialism to transform them? This is the core of the conflict between marxism and psychology.

Context
The marxist method considers human experience in social-historical context. Psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, medicine, genetics, and most other disciplines consider the individual (or parts of the individual) separate from the social context. The assumption is that the individual (or the part) has enduring biological or psychological qualities that are governed by different rules than those that govern the larger society. Therefore, these qualities can be changed only at the level of the individual or the part.

Separating the individual from the social in order to emphasize the individual is capitalist ideology, not science. Prioritizing individual factors absolves the system of responsibility. And if individuals can choose what happens, they can be blamed for choosing badly, again letting the system off the hook.

Science tells us that the social and individual shape each other in dynamic interaction. If one has more weight, it is the material and social environment out of which our species evolved and which capitalism has poisoned.

Environmental toxins cause the vast majority of cancers, yet cancer victims are blamed for making unhealthy choices and for having ‘cancer personalities’ or ‘cancer genes.’ Similarly, alienation creates mental distress, yet ‘mental illness’ is blamed on wrong thinking, wonky brain chemistry, or defective genes. Blaming the victim protects the system by keeping the focus on what individuals are doing instead of what the system is doing to them.

Oppression
‘Mental illness’ used to mean insanity. The 1918 American compendium of psychiatric disorders contained 22 diagnostic categories, 21 of which referred to forms of insanity. Since then, the category of ‘mental illness’ has ballooned to include a broad range of deviant and rebellious behaviours, different ways of processing information (neurodiversity), emotional responses to isolation and deprivation, and trauma-related symptoms. The label of ‘mental illness’ is used to pathologize those who protest, those who suffer, and those whose needs undermine productivity. Whether limitations are physical or mental, the less-productive are stigmatized as socially defective and more or less expendable.

People labelled ‘mentally ill’ form an oppressed group. Like all forms of oppression, ‘mental illness’ affects people from all classes. However, as with other forms of oppression, the burden falls most heavily upon the working class. The mentally distressed suffer legal, medical, social, and housing discrimination. They can be forcibly confined in institutions, drugged against their will, and denied the right to make decisions regarding their lives. They are over-represented among the incarcerated and are more likely to be unemployed, poor, and homeless.

Oppression is essential to capitalism. Subjugating oppressed groups enables a small ruling class to divide and rule a much larger working class. In particular, oppressing the ‘mentally ill’ enforces conformity of thought, feeling, and behaviour in society as a whole.

Defiance
Psychiatry serves capitalism by treating defiance as a mental disorder. Through the 1950s, the label of ‘schizophrenia’ was mainly applied to discontented housewives. The anti-racist revolts of the 1960s prompted the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) to change its description of schizophrenia from primarily depressed moods to hostility, aggression, and delusions of persecution, that is, from White suburban housewives to rebellious urban Blacks. Today, Black Americans are three times more likely than White Americans to be labeled ‘schizophrenic.’

Psychiatrists and psychologists have pathologized the protests of slaves and political dissidents. They have lobotomized rebellious women and tried to convert homosexuals. They have campaigned for the euthanasia and sterilization of ‘social defectives.’ They assist at interrogations and torture. They drug soldiers to keep them killing. They drug old people and prisoners to keep them quiet. And they drug rebellious children.

As families sink into crisis, parents are less able to meet children’s emotional needs. Schools contribute to children’s distress by confining them in closed rooms for long periods to memorize information that has no connection to their lives. When children protest by acting out, professionals label them as mentally disordered and their parents as inadequate.

Once children are labelled, parents can be legally compelled to drug them. In 2013, more than eight million American children under age 17 were prescribed psychiatric drugs. One million of these children were under age five, and a quarter of a million were less than a year old.

Pseudoscience
Socialists stand up for the oppressed. We reject the argument that women should raise children because they are genetically programmed to be nurturers. We reject the argument that Black people are more likely to be poor because they are less intelligent. We understand that such biological arguments are not based on science; they are pseudoscience – propaganda disguised as science.

Capitalism systematically confuses science and pseudoscience, replacing what is true with claims of what is true. An example of pseudoscience is the claim that ‘mental illness’ is rooted in biology.�The biological model of mental distress reduces the mind to the brain, which becomes the object of study and treatment. (A variation of this model is Freudianism, which reduces the mind to the ge****ls.) Such crude materialism should not be confused with marxist materialism, which views mental distress in its social context — the individual expression of a society made sick by alienated labour.

The fact that social conditions generate mental distress is so obvious that a psychiatric industry is required to convince us otherwise. The 1952 edition of the DSM described ‘mental illness’ as a reaction to some external event, situation, or biological condition. This description was removed from all subsequent editions. The failure of the DSM to identify an external cause for ‘mental illness’ implies that the cause is internal to the individual (faulty thoughts, behaviours, chemistry, or genetics), and the treatment is to change the sufferer, not the conditions that cause the suffering. The emphasis on drug treatment and gene research flows from the biological model. And the practice of directing patients to change their thoughts, feelings, and behaviours implies that the central problem is the patient’s failure to function adequately.

Psychosis
Some concede that adverse conditions might cause child distress and emotional disorders like anxiety and depression, but perceptual disorders like psychosis must have a biological cause. This is faulty logic.

Human perception is socially constructed. The ideas that dominate society shape what people think, what they want, who they trust, who they fear, who they blame, and what is and is not acceptable. Mis-perception is also socially constructed. Psychologists, advertising consultants, and management experts are employed to ‘sell’ a system based on deception (“it’s a free country”), contradiction (war as humanitarian intervention), denial of lived experience (hard work is always rewarded), and threat (work or starve). While most people accept the unacceptable, they do not like it. Some rebel openly. Others protest through physical and mental symptoms, addiction, and su***de. Some escape to a different reality.

Psychosis typically develops during the transition from adolescence to adulthood, when the conflict between the way the world is and the way that it should be is most keenly experienced. Inability to resolve this contradiction causes some people to become highly anxious and deeply suspicious. The world makes no sense, so they ‘break with reality’ and hide in fantasy realms where imaginative metaphors communicate what cannot be articulated. We all talk to ourselves, but psychosis disrupts the relationship with the self so that internal voices are mis-perceived as coming from outside. Visual cues are also mis-interpreted to form the shapes of people and things that are not actually present.

The social basis of psychosis is dismissed by biologists and psychiatrists who treat the psychotic individual as a checklist of deficits to be corrected. The person’s experience, perspective, and social needs are ignored. No attention is paid to what the person is trying to communicate through speech, emotions, body language, and behaviour patterns. The emphasis is on manipulating brain chemistry, countering defective genes, and controlling behaviours.

Social support
The best treatment for mental illness is social support. A large American study found that ‘psychotic’ patients who received less medication and more individual and family support fared much better than patients who got the usual drug-focused treatment. The social-support model has been used successfully in Australia, Scandinavia, and elsewhere. The fact that social support can remedy disorders of perception tells us that these disorders are socially based.

Social support is also effective in treating mental illness on a societal level. A Canadian study of more than 2,000 severely mentally-ill homeless people found that providing stable housing was more effective than any other treatment.

Raising living standards can actually cure mental illness. An eight-year study in the United States found that poor children were being diagnosed with more than four times as many psychiatric symptoms as children who had never been poor. Midway through the study, a new gambling casino began paying financial bonuses that lifted 14 percent of the families out of poverty. Psychiatric symptoms among children who were no longer poor fell to the same level as children who had never been poor. In contrast, psychiatric symptoms remained high among the children who remained poor. Rising incomes enable parents to meet their own needs so that they are more able to meet their children’s needs.

Misery
It is impossible to be healthy under capitalism. Growing daily misery is compounded by the horror of perpetual war and environmental destruction. If you open your mind to the barbarism of capitalism, you are traumatized. If you close your mind to it, you lose your humanity.

The World Health Organization reports that the global su***de rate has risen 60 percent over the past 45 years, accounting for half of all violent deaths in men and 71 percent of violent deaths in women. Su***de is the leading cause of death in adolescent girls aged 15 to 19. In the United States, the su***de rate for Black boys aged 5 to 11 years has doubled since the 1990s.

Over the past 15 years, the inflation-adjusted income for American households headed by a high school graduate dropped 19 percent. This income drop has been accompanied by a 22 percent rise in the mortality rate of less educated middle-aged White Americans, primarily due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and su***de. If the mortality rate for this group had stayed constant, 96,000 deaths would have been avoided. If it had continued to decline at its previous rate, half-a-million lives would have been saved.

Removing the social sources of sickness is not an option under capitalism because it would interrupt the flow of profit. Instead, the system strives to improve people’s ability to function under the existing toxic conditions. To that end, scientific research is limited to the study and manipulation of individual factors. This is as true for cancer and heart disease as it is for ‘mental illness.’

It is impossible to separate the influence of environment and biology in a social system that poisons every aspect of life, down to the molecular level. After we eliminate capitalism and establish a health-promoting society, it will be easier to determine what role biology plays in the remaining problems. Until then, socialists must emphasize collective solutions for social problems, not indulge the delusion that they can be solved by scientists and experts at the individual level.

Integral
The conflict between marxism and psychology is not really about psychology or ‘mental illness.’ It is about understanding capitalism as an all-encompassing system of social relationships where individual experience changes in the process of changing society.

In the 1980s, workers in Poland organized themselves into the world’s largest union, containing one-third of the working-age population. As strikes spread and demonstrations grew, hospital psychiatric beds began to empty of workers and fill with sick government officials. This happened because rising class struggle opens the door to solving individual problems collectively. Decades of working class retreat have undermined confidence in collective solutions. Socialists are not immune to this discouragement.

It is extremely difficult to raise class solutions in a society dominated by individualism and the ‘yes-but’ stance of reformists who promote individual solutions ‘in the meantime.’ This ‘meantime,’ where the class struggle is suspended for the comfort of the few, is a fantasy.

There is no ‘meantime’ for the majority who must fight today or be crushed tomorrow. To win those fights, we must reconnect the socialist tradition with the working class, and we must do it now.
We build health in the process of fighting for better working and living conditions. We build health in the process of laying the foundation for a socialist society that engages everyone’s abilities and meets everyone’s needs."

To read the full article please click here: https://susanrosenthal.com/oppression/psychology-psychiatry/marxism-and-psychology/

02/04/2026

The excellent Gabor Maté on the correlation between between health and politics, showing how mental distress is often a reflection and byproduct of a profoundly sick society.

"My contention is that the very nature of the system in which people live their lives is a significant source of illness. The stress that we live under, the competition, the aggressiveness, the uncertainty, the loss of control that we experience in our lives.
Dr. Bessel van der Kork, a trauma expert at Boston University, has said that 99 per cent of the people in the criminal justice system are traumatized children. And so, what you’ve got is already traumatized people being further traumatized by the jail system.

In the U.S., the possession of crack co***ne was punished ten times as heavily as the possession of powdered co***ne. Who used crack co***ne? Poor blacks. Who used powdered co***ne? Rich whites. The effects are the same, it doesn’t matter, the one is not worse than the other.

If you actually look at the policies of political leaders over the generations, whose interests do they actually serve? Are they serving the interests of the people, or are they serving the interests of a small group of people who hold the levers of the economy.

I could make a reasonable case that underneath the veneer of political democracy lies a political dictatorship: very few people in charge running the system for their own benefit. So, if that’s the case, there’s no use in hoping for leaders to be any different, because if they’re any different they won’t get elected, because the media that’s controlled by the same elite will never let them have any kind of a voice.

What is it about our culture today that impedes that sort of mindfulness and reflection to enable us to live well with others? The Globe has a billboard saying 'Never Stop Thinking.' That’s one part of the problem, that we’re totally caught up in thought. I’m not the first one to say so. Eckhart Tolle and others talk about the disease of thinking. 'Never Stop Thinking,' that’s the whole problem. People don’t. Instead of being mindful and aware of what’s going on, we get caught up in our thoughts.

Society undermines awareness. In a materialist society, the fundamental assumption is that only doing and having matters.

I don’t think the system can be reformed. No ruling class has ever reformed itself out of power. They just don’t. I can suggest things that can happen now, ways people can protect themselves. Activism is one way to protect yourself, as long as you don’t get consumed by it. If you are active, you join with others, then you don’t get so powerless."

Read the full article here: https://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/gabor-mate-how-capitalism-makes-us-sick

16/03/2026

Oggi sono tre anni che Franco Rotelli ci ha lasciato. Ma non è uscito dalle nostre vite in punta dei piedi.
L’eredità che ci ha lasciato è un impegno vivo e pulsante che continua a indicare direzioni e obiettivi.
Ed è proprio con l’intento di continuare a percorrere quella strada condivisa con lui che abbiamo immaginato di ricordarlo attraverso delle giornate di studio dedicate proprio alla sua persona e al suo operato.
Il 27 e 28 marzo toccheremo la terra e bagneremo ancora le rose per cambiare le cose.

12/03/2026

[ Aprire l'Istituzione non è aprire una porta, ma la nostra testa di fronte a "questo" malato...La follia è una condizione umana. In noi la follia esiste ed è presente come lo è la ragione. L'establishment psichiatrico definisce il nostro lavoro come privo di serietà e rispettabilità scientifica. Il giudizio non può che lusingarci, dato che esso ci accomuna, finalmente, alla mancanza di serietà e di rispettabilità da sempre riconosciuta al malato mentale e a tutti gli esclusi.]

- Come scattano i meccanismi di esclusione del f***e dal contesto sociale?

Ricorda “I poveri sono matti” di Zavattini? Ecco quel titolo corrisponde alla realtà. Intendiamoci, anche i ricchi sono matti, ma il modo di gestire la pazzia di un ricco è diverso da quello di gestire la pazzia del povero.
L’esclusione nasce dal fatto che l’organizzazione sociale non dà alla persona la possibilità di gestirsi in proprio, ma le impone di farsi gestire da altri in un gioco di mercificazione di sé, di oggettivazione di sé.
L’organizzazione sanitaria, infatti, ha bisogno di oggettivare l’altro perché deve curarlo. Così lo disumanizza, gli toglie ogni connotato di identità, lo trasforma in oggetto anonimo.
C’è una sorta di culto del pessimismo nella malattia mentale, per cui si ritiene che la follia sia qualcosa di originario, di biologicamente impossibile da modificare: da questo alla convinzione che il malato sia inservibile, e quindi da escludere, il passo è breve. Il malato di mente diventa, così, parte dell’emarginazione sociale, nel pieno rispetto dell’ideologia dominante e della falsa coscienza.
Lombroso studiava il fenomeno della pellagra e aveva scoperto che la pellagra è l’effetto di una cattiva alimentazione. Allora diceva: “Non possiamo dar da mangiare a tutti i pellagrosi, perché non ne abbiamo la possibilità. Perciò non ci rimane che curarli”.
Alla luce di questo aneddoto dovrebbe essere ancora più evidente come il malato di mente viene emarginato. Siccome, infatti, il problema non è curarlo, perché il concetto scientifico da cui si parte per curare la follia è sbagliato, ne consegue che il malato di mente viene custodito. E lo è perché rappresenta un pericolo e un danno.
Custodito, dunque, ed escluso: ecco come nasce un’emarginazione, che non è poi la sola. Larga parte della società paga perché alcuni stiano bene; e pagano proprio quelli che stanno male. Lo diceva anche Sartre: “Tre quarti dell’umanità paga perché un quarto possa vivere”.

Raffaele Di Paolo - da intervista a Franco Basaglia - 1976

https://clinicalpedagogy.com/intervista-inedita-al-prof-franco-basaglia/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQc9L9leHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETBvTzhhR3BJOWhPSXlzR3g4c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHs3PYy3A-uU0SEHUPGNDdKyoDo6DsS6qBgIVsTefRECug47KWYsBXpubJhvt_aem_A1ihE5P1FY54DfStfvDllA

§

Era da tanti anni che fotografavo il lavoro dei Basagliani all’interno dei manicomi. Tra tutti questi lavori Leros era il più importante perché la situazione dei pazienti era veramente drammatica. Fotografare i matti è una cosa molto facile, sono già un soggetto potentissimo di per sé. Quello che mi interessava era mostrare l’energia degli operatori: un anno di lavoro in un posto del genere è come un concentrato di quello che i Basagliani possono fare. C’era un’energia fortissima. Dopo trentadue anni in cui sei n**o, mangi come un animale, vieni picchiato e sei legato, gli stessi pazienti non ci credevano, non si fidavano. Come fai a spiegare a ognuno di loro in ogni momento che non deve più aver paura, che deve stare tranquillo? Era molto difficile: molto spesso succedeva che il lavoro fatto al mattino dagli operatori, alla sera era completamente distrutto dai pazienti.

Alex Majoli

ph MagnumPhotos: da il Portfolio su Leros 1994

10/03/2026

When does a privately felt feeling morph into a collective emotion? And how does our cultural background and embeddedness shape these feelings? In this Essay, the philosopher and historian Noga Arikha ponders the interplay between the collective and the private of our inner lives, consulting the work of Franz Boas, the founder of modern American anthropology, to answer the question ‘Who am I when I care?’

Boas’s work fundamentally shaped contemporary ideas on cultural conditioning, which he argued for vehemently and against the cultural mainstream of his time, refuting ideas of racial and ethnic hierarchies among humans. Instead, Boas argued, it is exactly the peculiarity of our cultural context that shapes our emotional experience, as we are always looking at the world through what he called our ‘Kulturbrille’, or cultural lens.

Realising this, Arikha argues, will help us become more democratic, attentive and open to the world – like Boas himself was:

‘Boas was an activist literally until his dying breath, in December 1942, while the war raged across the ocean – his last words before a fatal heart attack were: “We should never stop repeating the idea that racism is a monstrous error and an impudent lie.”’

Read or listen to this Essay in full here. https://aeon.co/essays/who-am-i-when-i-care-emotion-through-the-lens-of-franz-boas

04/03/2026

We tend to think that depression and other mental illnesses are medical conditions caused by problems in the brain, and that framing them this way reduces stigma and leads to better treatment.

However, Joanna Moncrieff argues that this is deeply mistaken, and that medicalising mental distress can actually increase stigma, undermine hope of recovery, and distract us from what really helps.

Drawing on science, philosophy, and the history of pharmaceutical marketing, join Joanna in the search for a new and better model of mental health.

Joanna Moncrieff is a British psychiatrist and academic. She is Professor of Critical and Social Psychiatry at University College London and a leading figure in the Critical Psychiatry Network.

Tap here to watch her full interview. https://iai.tv/video/the-medicalisation-of-mental-illness-joanna-moncrieff

25/02/2026

"Is Freud right when he claimed that psychoanalysis is concerned with ‘social phenomenon’ including politics?

We could postulate that had Freud been alive today, to a degree he could have included social phenomena such as television, spectator sports, mainstream cinema or celebrity culture in a long list of (as he puts it) 'powerful distractions, which cause us to make light of our misery, substitutive factions, which diminish it', and particularly 'intoxicants, which anaesthetise us to it.'

It could easily be argued that the entire 'Society of the Spectacle' serves to lull all of us into an inertia that keeps us blissfully unaware of the causes of our collective miseries and frustrations.

But the organisation of the 'Spectacle', its invasion into every part of our daily lives and encroachment into our psyches, keeps us all sufficiently docile and submissive, despite the very real internal antagonisms and contradictions imposed on us by the external world. 'Those who organise the world organise both suffering and the anaesthetics for dealing with it; this much is common knowledge. Most people live like sleepwalkers, torn between the gratification of neurosis and the traumatic prospect of a return to real life' [Raoul Vaneigem, 'The Revolution of Everyday Life'].

Psychoanalysis and especially psychiatry has, to some extent, become part of the repressive machinery of society. It has been co-opted and put into use as a lubricant for the cogs of oppression and can therefore be defined as a tool not just for explaining social phenomenon, but for keeping social, political and economic structures in place and consequently is a highly politicised discipline. The Foucauldian notion that psychiatry, like all other specialised branches of knowledge, science and ideology, has become part of a vast superstructure of oppressive control and manipulation here rings true.

In this reading, a well-established and prevailing sense of powerlessness, anxiety and mental instability exists not due to the internal repression of Oedipal desire or early traumatic experiences, but because of a the regulation of our lives by large-scale organisations and the lack of influence people have over their own lives.

Whereas Freud's psychoanalytical standpoint blames an almost factional dispute between superego and id on the incontinuity of the self, the Foucauldian perspective puts down the lack of any autonomous decision-making or 'power processes' in the creation of entire populations of psychologically perturbed subjects. But as in the texts of Freud, sublimation of real needs and desires for what are described as 'surrogate activities', is seen as a necessary prescription for people living in a society where mental health is 'defined largely by the extent to which an individual behaves in accord with the needs of the system and does so without showing signs of stress.'

Freud's inclination towards authoritarian systems of governance or perhaps reluctant acceptance of such methods of social organisation are born out of his fear of what he called the, 'psychological malaise of crowds' and a 'bias against those whom he called "the masses".'

Human beings, for Freud, are too volatile and untrustworthy not to be controlled by some external authority, the pros of civilisation vastly outweigh the cons, and all of us, 'the masses', being unable to effectively manage our own psychic emotions, must submit to servitude and be managed by others. Authority is legitimised and the very worst features of 'civilisation' justified 'to overcome the disturbance of communal life caused by the human drive for aggression and self-destruction.'

In many respects, psychoanalysis could be accused of externalising and applying too universally personal neuroses and turning individual mental characteristics and psychic problems into all-encompassing explanations of social phenomena (including political structures) without placing these phenomena in their historical, cultural, or social context.

Applying 'to large-scale social processes and institutions the concepts and categories which he had developed on the private realm', Freud universalised his essentialist views on the individual psyche and attempted to explain all social phenomena through a rigid psychoanalytic grid that he himself had constructed a priori.

To conclude, Freud is correct in his assertion that psychoanalysis is concerned with social phenomenon and the discipline can be a useful and radical tool in explaining various political structures and cultural and societal trends. However, Freudian psychoanalysis in particular has a tendency to equate individual psychiatric trends with generalised trends in society. The individual and the social are inextricably linked, however, the result of universalising and generalising psychoanalysis to explain political and social phenomena often means that events are taken out of their historical and economic context and placed in a sometimes unsuitable framework and viewed from a doctrinaire perspective."

This is an edited and abbreviated version of the article 'Psychoanalysis, Freud, Civilization and Capitalism'. To read the original piece, please click here: https://libcom.org/article/psychoanalysis-freud-civilization-and-capitalism

Indirizzo

Sede Didattica: Fondazione Stella Maris, Viale Tirreno 331
Calambrone

Notifiche

Lasciando la tua email puoi essere il primo a sapere quando Scuola Specializzazione in Psicoterapia a orientamento etnopsicoterapeutico pubblica notizie e promozioni. Il tuo indirizzo email non verrà utilizzato per nessun altro scopo e potrai annullare l'iscrizione in qualsiasi momento.

Contatta Lo Studio

Invia un messaggio a Scuola Specializzazione in Psicoterapia a orientamento etnopsicoterapeutico:

Condividi

Digitare