Dr Ammar Abuajamieh - الدكتور عمار ابوعجمية

10/05/2026

شوف الفيديو الجديد يا روحي واعطيني رأيك, بعنوان:
2. السكري النوع الثاني ليس بمرض وراثي
رابط الفيديو عاليوتيوب: https://links.alkhalidmc.com/adCM09

10/05/2026

So I just realized I've been doing social media completely wrong, and honestly, it explains why my posts sometimes get buried 😅

Turns out the problem isn't that I'm not posting enough. It's that I'm treating Threads and Bluesky like they're the same platform when they're basically asking for completely different things.

Threads wants you to sound like you're chatting at a coffee shop with an expert who actually knows their stuff. Visual, polished, hooks that make people stop scrolling. Meanwhile Bluesky is like hanging out with your actual community who just want raw, real thoughts. No corporate polish needed.

Most creators just copy-paste the same post everywhere and wonder why nothing sticks. I get it now. You can't just dump the same message into different platforms and expect the algorithm to care. Each one has its own personality.

For Threads, I need to lead with that personal observation angle. For Bluesky, I should be sharing my actual thoughts more frequently, less filtered.

Medical professionals in here, are you even using these platforms yet? Or are you still stuck on the usual channels? Because the landscape is genuinely shifting, and the early movers are gonna have a massive advantage 💉

What's your experience been? Are you finding one platform actually works better for connecting with people in your field?

Struggling to manage the fragmented social media landscape in 2026? Learn the behavioral mechanics of Meta's algorithm vs Bluesky's chronological feed, and discover the smart framework for cross-posting without killing your reach.

10/05/2026

Most doctors I know are sitting on goldmines they don't even realize they have. 💭

I'm talking about their expertise in ad automation. Not the medical kind, obviously, but the business kind. You know, actually getting patients through the door without burning cash on ads that go nowhere.

Here's what I've noticed: we're brilliant at diagnosing complex conditions, but put us in front of Meta Ads Manager and suddenly we're lost. The algorithms are confusing, the bidding strategies feel like witchcraft, and half the time you're just throwing money at ads hoping something sticks.

But automation changes that game completely. When you set it up properly, the system does the heavy lifting for you. It learns what works, adjusts your bids in real-time, finds the right people to show your ads to, and honestly? It frees you up to actually run your practice instead of obsessing over campaign metrics.

The thing that gets me is that this technology exists right now. It's not some fancy future thing. Doctors who've actually invested time in understanding automation are seeing their costs drop and their patient acquisition improve. Meanwhile, others are still manually tweaking campaigns and wondering why they're hemorrhaging money. 😅

I'm not saying you need to become a marketing expert. You don't. But understanding the basics of how to set up automation properly? That's actually becoming part of running a modern medical practice.

Are you still managing your ads manually, or have you started exploring what automation can actually do for your clinic? Genuinely curious what's holding people back. 🤔

10/05/2026

I've noticed something wild lately. Medical professionals with thriving practices aren't necessarily the ones with the fanciest degrees or the most published research. They're the ones who figured out how to actually exist online. 🤔

Think about it. You can be brilliant in your field, but if nobody can find you when they're searching for help, does it really matter? It's like being an amazing surgeon in a town where nobody knows you exist.

The challenge isn't complicated, but it's real. Most doctors I know are terrible at going digital. Not because they're not smart enough, but because they never learned the rules of the online game. Website performance, security, how search engines actually work, content strategy that converts... these aren't things they taught us in medical school.

Here's what I've learned. When you go online properly, you're not just posting content and hoping. You're building trust through visibility. You're making it easy for patients to find you. You're showing up as an authority in your space. And yeah, that takes intention and planning, but it's absolutely learnable.

The doctors who are winning right now? They invested time in understanding their digital presence the same way they invested time mastering clinical skills. They treated it as seriously as they treat patient care.

So if you're running a practice, a clinic, or sharing medical expertise anywhere, ask yourself. Are you actually visible online? Or are you just hoping the right people stumble across you? Because one strategy scales. The other doesn't. 💊

What's been your biggest struggle with getting your medical work seen online? Genuinely curious what's holding people back.

10/05/2026

You know what I realized watching colleagues juggle patient care, admin work, and trying to maintain a consistent social media presence? Most of us are stretched way too thin. 😅

I was reading about content outsourcing the other day, and it hit me how many healthcare professionals and wellness experts are basically doing the work of three people. You're managing patients, running a practice, AND trying to create valuable content for your audience. That's insane.

Here's what stood out to me: outsourcing content writing isn't about cutting corners. It's about being smart with your resources. Think of it clinically, right? You wouldn't try to do every test yourself in the lab. You'd delegate to specialists so you can focus on what you do best, patient care.

When you hand off your content to skilled writers who understand your niche, something magical happens. You get consistent, high-quality material. Your audience stays engaged. Your SEO improves. And you actually get your time back to focus on the things that matter, like growing your practice and deepening patient relationships.

The cost? Way less than hiring someone full-time. The benefit? More content, better engagement, less stress on you.

If you're running yourself ragged trying to do everything, this might be worth exploring. You don't have to be a content creator. You just have to be a great doctor or wellness expert, and let the right people handle the rest.

Are you currently creating all your own content, or have you already outsourced? Drop your experience below. I'm curious how this is working for people in our field. 👇 Growth Hackers - GH

Content writing outsourcing is a great way to produce landing pages, ad copies, emails and social media captions that spark engagement and drive sales.

10/05/2026

I had a patient come in last week asking me how to actually get people to care about his health clinic. Not in a desperate way, just genuinely confused about why he'd invested all this money in a website and social presence but couldn't tell if it was working 🤔

Turned out he was doing everything right on paper. Nice website, decent content, regular posts. But he had absolutely zero idea which of it was actually bringing patients through the door. He was essentially throwing darts in the dark and hoping one landed.

This stuck with me because it's such a common problem, and honestly, it's kind of like practicing medicine without diagnostic tools. You're treating symptoms instead of understanding what's actually broken.

The difference between a clinic that grows and one that stagnates often isn't the quality of their work. It's whether they're actually measuring what matters. Which channels are patients coming from? Which messages actually resonate? What's the cost per acquisition versus what you're spending?

Most healthcare providers I know just guess. They copy what competitors do or follow whatever trend is hot this month. Then they wonder why their return on investment looks terrible.

Here's what I told him: stop guessing. Spend a week tracking actual data. Where are your inquiries coming from? What content gets responses? Which platforms are your patients actually using? You don't need fancy analytics software for this. Just pay attention to the numbers you already have.

Because the same principle we use in medicine applies here. You can't treat what you're not measuring. And you definitely can't scale what you don't understand.

Are you actually tracking what's working for your practice or organization, or are you just hoping something sticks? 👇

10/05/2026

You know what I realized while thinking about customer service in healthcare? We're making the same mistake in medicine that businesses make with their support teams. 🏥

We're trying to use humans for everything when we should be asking: which conversations actually need a doctor's judgment, and which ones are just repetitive information that could be handled instantly?

Think about it. A patient calling at 2 AM asking about medication side effects or appointment times or billing questions? That's routine stuff. But a patient with chest pain or a complex medication interaction? That needs human judgment, reassurance, and accountability.

The article I just read breaks this down for customer service, but it applies perfectly to healthcare too. The math is wild when you do it honestly:

A human interaction costs somewhere between $2.58 to $4.54 (or way more for complex cases). But automated responses for routine questions? That's pennies. The real cost isn't the technology. It's paying human rates for work that doesn't need human expertise.

The catch? The automation only works when your information is actually good and your escalation rules are clear. Bad data in = bad answers out.

So here's my question for all the medical professionals reading this: What percentage of your day is spent on routine questions that could be answered instantly by a good system? And how much of that time could you actually spend on cases that need your clinical judgment? 💭

Because that's where the real value lives.

When does AI beat a human agent? A practical framework with cost math, CSAT data, and the hybrid support model strong teams use.

10/05/2026

You know what I've noticed working in emergency medicine? The best teams aren't built on fancy job titles or impressive credentials alone. They're built on people who actually *want* to be there. 🏥

I was thinking about this after seeing how many organizations obsess over their employer brand while completely ignoring what their employees actually experience day to day. They'll spend months crafting the perfect tagline, but then new hires walk in and realize the reality is completely different. Talk about whiplash. 😅

Here's what actually matters: Do your people know why they joined? Do they feel heard? Are there real conversations happening, or just corporate townhalls where nobody says what they actually think?

The strongest workplaces I've seen are the ones that listen first, ask hard questions, and then build their story around the truth. Not the polished version. The real one. Because people can smell BS from a mile away, and frankly, they're tired of it.

Whether you're running a hospital, a clinic, or any team really, your people are your message. They're walking advertisements for what you actually stand for.

What's the biggest gap you've seen between what an organization says it values and what it actually does? 👇

10/05/2026

60 new features dropped on Omnisend in one year. Sixty. 🤯

That's the kind of pace you see when a platform actually listens to what their users need instead of just chasing trends. And honestly, as someone who's spent way too much time watching marketing tools evolve, that's refreshing.

What caught my attention though isn't just the volume, it's the direction. They're doubling down on ecommerce automation, segmentation precision, and multichannel workflows. Not flashy stuff. Not "AI this" and "revolutionary that." Just tools that actually solve real problems for online businesses.

It reminds me of something I noticed in emergency medicine too. The doctors who get the best outcomes aren't the ones chasing the newest tech. They're the ones who master the fundamentals and then add tools that genuinely improve workflow. Same principle applies here.

The ecommerce space is getting crowded, but when a platform focuses on depth over breadth, it shows. Especially when support is available 24/7 and actually responds in minutes, not days.

Do you find yourself drawn to tools that constantly add features, or do you prefer platforms that nail the basics and iterate thoughtfully? Curious what your experience has been 👇

10/05/2026

Most healthcare professionals I talk to are running their practices like they're still in 2015. No digital presence, no targeted outreach, just hoping patients find them somehow. 🤷‍♂️

Meanwhile, the ones who've embraced digital marketing? They're not just surviving, they're thriving. And here's what's wild: they're not doing anything complicated.

They're simply reaching the right people at the right time instead of shouting into the void hoping someone listens. It's like the difference between handing out flyers to random people on the street versus actually talking to patients who are actively looking for your exact services.

Digital marketing lets you do that precision targeting. You can identify your ideal patient, understand what they're searching for, and meet them there. SEO, social media, targeted ads, email campaigns - these aren't luxuries anymore. They're the baseline for running a practice that actually grows.

And the cost? Way more efficient than traditional marketing ever was. You're not burning money on methods that don't track results. You can see exactly what's working and what's not.

So here's my question: are you still operating like it's the old days, or are you actually using the tools available to connect with the patients who need you? 💬

Growth Hackers - GH

If you want to make the most of the latest trends and tools, it's the time to work with a seasoned digital marketing agency to run your campaigns.

10/05/2026

You know what's wild? 73% of people say social media campaigns actually influence their buying decisions. 73%! 🤯

I stumbled across this breakdown of campaigns that actually work, and the pattern is obvious once you see it. Aldi's "FreeCuthbert" campaign, Greggs roasting Piers Morgan over a vegan sausage roll, Spotify's Wrapped going viral every single year... what do they all have in common?

They're not trying to be perfect. They're being authentically themselves.

Greggs didn't hire some fancy agency to craft the perfect response. They just replied like a real person would. Aldi made fun of their own legal drama instead of hiding from it. Spotify keeps their Wrapped formula simple but personal.

Here's what blew my mind though. The article breaks down these campaigns and the common thread isn't production quality or budget size. It's knowing your audience so well that you speak directly to them. It's personality over polish.

As doctors and medical professionals, we get trained to be formal and careful with our words (rightfully so with patients!). But on social media? That's where the real connection happens. The unfiltered clinic story beats the perfectly worded medical post every single time.

So my question for you, what's stopping you from being more authentic on your social channels? Is it fear of looking unprofessional, or something else? 💬

What makes the best social media advertising campaigns successful? Find out by looking at some of the greatest cross-channel campaigns with Bannerflow