27/12/2025
ααΎααααΆααΆα’αααααααΆαααΆααα·αααααΆαα?
α¦α α ααααΆααααααααααα·ααΆααααα ααΆαααΆααααααΆααααΆαα
αααΆααααΌααααααΎαααααΎαα‘αΎααααααααΆαααα
αΆαα
βααΆααα
αΆααααΆααααΈααΆαααΆααα»α αα·ααααααα·α
ααααααΆααααα»αα’αααααααα»αααααΆα α‘α€α£α‘ ααααα½αααα αα αΌααααααααΆαααΎαααΆαααΆααααα αΆαααΆαααααΌαα’αΆααΆααααααααα ααα
ααααΆαα F-16 αααααα α
αΌααααΆααααα
αααα»αααΉαααΈααααα»ααΆααΆααααα
αα
α»ααααααααα αααααααΆαααΆααα’αααααααΊα ααΆαααααΆαααΆα, ααΆαααΆααααααΉαααΈ, ααΆαα
αΌαααΆααααΆαα, ααΆααααααααααααΆααααααα, ααΆαααα·αααααΆαααΈααΆαααααα»ααΆααΆααα»αααα·αααα’ααααααΆαα· (ICJ), αα·αααΆααααααααα·ααααα·αααααΆααααα»ααααα»ααααααααα½α α±αααα
ααΆααΆαααααααα»αααΆααααααΆαα
ααΆααααααααααααααα
βαααααΎααΆαααααααΊαα·αααΆα
αααΆααααΆαα, αα·ααααααααα½α, αα·αααΎαα‘αΎαααααα αΎααααααααα
αααααααα·ααΆααααααα·αα
αααα»α αα‘αΎαα
βααΌα
αααα ααΎααααΆααΆα’αααααααΆαααΆα?
Who are the true invaders?
Over the past 600 years, history has revealed a clear and consistent pattern.
From the Siamese attack and invasion of Angkor in 1431 to modern-day F-16 airstrikes deep into Cambodian sovereignty, these actions share the same nature: invasion, annexation, occupation, provocation of war, rejection of rulings by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the manipulation of domestic political crises into border conflicts.
They are repeated, deliberate, and systematic.
History does not lie.
So who is the real aggressor?