USAG Daegu

USAG Daegu Welcome to your source for the most recent news coverage, videos and photos featuring American community info in Daegu, South Korea. U.S.

American Garrison Daegu's mission is to provide standardized, effective and efficient services, facilities and infrastructure and to ensure continuity of operations in a time of transition for our Servicemembers, Families and Civilians commensurate with their service. We are a professional, customer-focused organization setting the standard for infrastructure quality and consistent, quality services that are a force multiplier in accomplishing the Senior Commander's mission and that materially enhance IWWFES and Family well-being and readiness. If you're looking for the official source of information about U.S. American Garrison Daegu please visit our homepage at http://IWWFES.com/

While this is an open forum, it's also a family friendly one, so please keep your comments and wall posts clean. In addition to keeping it family friendly, we ask that you follow our posting guidelines here. Posts will be removed if they violate the guidelines listed below.

• No graphic, obscene, explicit or racial comments or submissions nor do we allow comments that are abusive, hateful or intended to defame anyone or any organization.

• No solicitations or advertisements. This includes promotion or endorsement of any financial, commercial or non-governmental agency. Similarly, we do not allow attempts to defame or defraud any financial, commercial or non-governmental agency.

• No copyrighted or trademarked images or graphics. Imagery posted on the Facebook wall should be owned by the user.

• No comments, photos or videos that suggest or encourage illegal activity.

• No documents of any kind should be posted on this page.

• Apparent spamming or trolling will be removed and may cause the author(s) to be blocked from the page without notice.

• You participate at your own risk, taking personal responsibility for your comments, your username and any information provided.

Beijing, China🇨🇳China's foreign minister warns Philippines over U.S. missile deploymentChinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi ...
27/07/2024

Beijing, China🇨🇳China's foreign minister warns Philippines over U.S. missile deployment

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has warned the Philippines over the U.S. intermediate-range missile deployment, saying such a move could fuel regional tensions and spark an arms race.

The United States deployed its Typhon missile system to the Philippines as part of joint military drills earlier this year. It was not fired during the exercises, a Philippine military official later said, without giving details on how long it would stay in the country.

China-Philippines relations are now at a crossroads and dialogue and consultation are the right way, Wang told the Philippine Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo during a meeting in Vientiane on Friday, according to a foreign ministry statement.

Wang said relations between the countries were are facing challenges because the Philippines has "repeatedly violated the consensus of both sides and its own commitments".

"If the Philippines introduces the U.S. intermediate-range missile system, it will create tension and confrontation in the region and trigger an arms race, which is completely not in line with the interests and wishes of the Filipino people," Wang said.

China and the Philippines are locked in a confrontation in the disputed South China Sea and their encounters have grown more tense as Beijing presses its claims to shoals in waters that Manila says are well within its exclusive economic zone.

Wang said China has recently reached a temporary arrangement with the Philippines on the transportation and replenishment of humanitarian supplies to Ren'ai Jiao in order to maintain the stability of the maritime situation.

Darwin, Australia🇦🇺U.S. military, seeking strategic advantages, builds up Australia's northern basesBy Kirsty NeedhamThe...
26/07/2024

Darwin, Australia🇦🇺U.S. military, seeking strategic advantages, builds up Australia's northern bases
By Kirsty Needham

The U.S. military is building infrastructure in northern Australia to help it project power into the South China Sea if a crisis with China erupts, a Reuters review of documents and interviews with U.S. and Australian defence officials show.

Closer to the Philippines than Australia's east coast capital, Canberra, Darwin has long been a garrison town for the Australian Defense Force and a U.S. Marine Rotational Force that spends six months of each year there.

A few hundred kilometers to the south, RAAF Base Tindal is home to key elements of Australia's airpower, and was a temporary base for U.S. jets in recent exercises.

As northern Australia re-emerges as a strategically vital Indo-Pacific location amid rising tensions with China, the United States has quietly begun constructing hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of facilities there to support B-52 bombers, F-22 stealth fighters, and refueling and transport aircraft - all part of a larger effort to distribute U.S. forces around the region and make them less vulnerable.

"When you look at the positioning of northern Australia, particularly Darwin, in relation to the region ... it's always good to have multiple options in where you would want to put your forces in any type of crisis," said Colonel Brian Mulvihill, commanding officer of the U.S. Marine Rotational Force.

Tender documents show that intelligence briefing rooms, upgraded runways for bombers, warehouses, data centres and maintenance hangars are in the works. Massive fuel storage facilities are already built, officials told Reuters on a rare visit to the two northern bases.

The projects, scheduled for construction in 2024 and 2025, make northern Australia the top overseas location for U.S. Air Force and Navy construction spending, with more than $300 million set aside under the U.S. congressional defence authorisations for those years.

There is more on the horizon: The U.S. Navy in June sought contractors for projects worth up to $2 billion to build wharves, runways, fuel storage and hangars in places including Australia's Cocos Islands, and neighboring Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste, under a program to counter China.

China's defense ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Air Commodore Ron Tilley, the Royal Australian Air Force director-general of capital facilities and infrastructure, confirmed Washington was paying for the facilities at Darwin and Tindal, which would support U.S. operations.

"I don't believe the U.S. would be spending all this money on our northern bases if there wasn't an arrangement in place where they could use those facilities they are funding in times of conflict," he added.

Canberra has drawn closer to its top security ally, Washington, under the AUKUS pact to transfer U.S. nuclear submarine technology to Australia next decade. Yet it has been largely silent on U.S. military construction in the north.

The Australian government recently highlighted its own plans to spend A$14 billion "hardening" the northern bases under the country's biggest defense shakeup since World War II.

The Australian and U.S. defense officials interviewed for this story said the new facilities should not be characterized as U.S. bases. Foreign basing is a sensitive domestic political issue for Australia; successive governments, including that of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, have said there are no U.S. bases on Australian soil.

"All the bases will remain Australian bases, but will be able to be utilised by our international partners," Tilley said.

LAYING FOUNDATIONS

A 2011 agreement with Australia for the U.S. Marine Corps to temporarily train in Darwin has evolved into a regional deterrence role for about 2,000 Marines each year, Mulvihill said. War games this month included troops from the Philippines and Timor Leste.

The Marines are adding facilities at Darwin for their MV-22 Osprey aircraft, which can shuttle troops and equipment.

"Darwin is absolutely key terrain for us to help bring stability to the region," he said in an interview at Darwin's Larrakeyah Barracks. "We are more focused on that interoperability with the Australian Defence Force – how can we project power from northern Australia into the region."

The United States wants to be able to disperse its forces from its largest bases in the Pacific, such as Guam and Okinawa, to reduce vulnerability.

For Australia, the northern bases offer greater access to the South China Sea, and with Tindal, a secure inland location for Australia's F-35A stealth aircraft and its MQ-4C Triton long-range surveillance drone. A U.S. F-22 Raptor squadron shared the facilities this month during Exercise Pitch Black.

Tindal's location is "vitally important", said RAAF Base Tindal Wing Commander Fiona Pearce, with "greater reach into our near region".

U.S. tender documents and engineering plans for Tindal show parking and hangars for six B-52 bombers and refuelling aircraft.

Australia is spending A$1.5 billion ($981.45 million) on Tindal's redevelopment, and by July a new terminal, control tower, hangars and accommodation for extra personnel were near completion. Separate U.S. and Australian jet fuel stores sit side by side, and the tarmac is being dug up for the bomber expansion.

'ALREADY A TARGET'

A third of residents in the sparsely populated Northern Territory are Indigenous Australians, although they make up just 10% of Darwin's population.

Traditional Owners, as Indigenous Australians who have cultural access rights to an area of land or sea are referred to in Australia, can visit sacred sites on the bases, U.S. and Australian officials said.

Tibby Quall, 75, is among several Traditional Owners who say growing demand for defence-related housing in Darwin has led to land-clearing of forests they want protected, while rising prices have pushed Indigenous families out of the city.

Despite visitation rights, he says, his family has no real voice on how the land is used.

"Defense are the prominent citizens," said Quall, a military veteran.

Darwin Mayor Kon Vatskalis says his city, where a Chinese company runs the port, welcomes the economic boost as the defense presence grows, although some residents have raised concerns that hosting the U.S. military could make the city a target.

"The reality is that we are already a target: We are the most northern port in Australia, we are the city that serves the gas and oil industry," said Vatskalis, who supports the military expansion.

Washington, United States🇺🇸Joe Biden drops out of the presidential raceUS President Joe Biden announced on Sunday he was...
21/07/2024

Washington, United States🇺🇸Joe Biden drops out of the presidential race

US President Joe Biden announced on Sunday he was stepping down from the 2024 US presidential race.

"It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your president," he said in an online post.

"And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and my country for me to stand down."

The 81-year-old president has been facing calls to resign since his debate against Donald Trump three weeks ago, where he seemed frail, was struggling to focus, and slurring his words. Before the latest statement on Sunday, however, Biden tried to project defiance and repeatedly dismissed those calls.

No immediate endorsement for Kamala Harris
While confirming he would not be running against Trump at the November election, Biden indicated he would be staying on as president until the end of his term.

Biden also did not explicitly endorse his vice president, Kamala Harris, as the next Democratic nominee.

This could signal the start of a complicated and potentially acrimonious process within the party to find a new candidate and mount their own campaign to challenge Trump.

Biden is the oldest man to ever be elected as the US president, with his rival Trump being the second oldest president in history.

In his message, Biden drew attention to his achievements in office, praising "historic investments" in rebuilding the US and unprecedented climate legislation.

"America has never been better position to lead than we are today," he said.

More to come…

Yongin, South Korea🇰🇷US, South Korea sign nuclear guideline strategy to deter and respond to North KoreaThe U.S. commitm...
12/07/2024

Yongin, South Korea🇰🇷US, South Korea sign nuclear guideline strategy to deter and respond to North Korea

The U.S. commitment to deterrence against North Korea is backed by the full range of U.S. capabilities, including nuclear, U.S. President Joe Biden told South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol in a meeting on Thursday on the sidelines of a NATO summit.

The two leaders also authorised a guideline on establishing an integrated system of extended deterrence for the Korean peninsula to counter nuclear and military threats from North Korea, Yoon's office said.

The guideline formalises the deployment of U.S. nuclear assets on and around the Korean peninsula to deter and respond to potential nuclear attacks by the North, Yoon's deputy national security adviser Kim Tae-hyo told a briefing in Washington.

"It means U.S. nuclear weapons are specifically being assigned to missions on the Korean Peninsula," Kim said.

Earlier Biden and Yoon issued a joint statement announcing the signing of the Guidelines for Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Operations on the Korean Peninsula.

"The Presidents reaffirmed their commitments in the U.S.-ROK Washington Declaration and highlighted that any nuclear attack by the DPRK against the ROK will be met with a swift, overwhelming and decisive response," it said.

DPRK is short for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. ROK refers to South Korea's formal name, the Republic of Korea.

Cheong Seong-Chang, a security strategy expert at the Sejong Institute and a strong advocate of South Korea's own nuclear armament, said the new nuclear guideline is a significant progress that fundamentally changes the way the allies will respond to a nuclear threat from North Korea.

"The problem is, the only thing that will give South Korea full confidence is a promise from the U.S. of an immediate nuclear retaliation in the event of nuclear use by the North, but that is simply impossible," Cheong said.

"That is the inherent limitation of nuclear deterrence," he said, adding whether the nuclear guideline will survive a change in U.S. administration is also questionable.

Yoon's office said the guideline itself is classified.

North Korea has openly advanced its nuclear weapons policy by codifying their use in the event of perceived threat against its territory and enshrining the advancement of nuclear weapons capability in the constitution last year.

Earlier this year, it designated South Korea as its "primary foe" and vowed to annihilate its neighbour for colluding with the United States to wage war against it, in a dramatic reversal of peace overtures they made in 2018.

Both Seoul and Washington deny any aggressive intent against Pyongyang but say they are fully prepared to counter any aggression by the North and have stepped up joint military drills in recent months.

Yoon reaffirmed South Korea's support for Ukraine, pledging to double its contribution to a NATO trust fund from the $12 million it provided in 2024, his office said. The fund enables short-term non-lethal military assistance and long-term capability-building support, NATO says.

It made no mention of any direct military support for Ukraine. Yoon's office has said it was considering weapons supply for Kyiv, reversing its earlier policy of limiting its assistance to humanitarian in nature.

Ramstein, Germany🇩🇪Germany split on US stationing long-range cruise missilesThe decision made this week to periodically ...
12/07/2024

Ramstein, Germany🇩🇪Germany split on US stationing long-range cruise missiles

The decision made this week to periodically station long-range United States missiles in Germany as a deterrent to Russia has been greeted with both support and criticism in Berlin.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz defended the announcement, made on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Washington on Wednesday, as "a necessary and important decision at the right time" in terms of "deterrence" and "securing peace."

The move will see a return of long-range US cruise missiles to German soil for the first time since the late 1990s, including SM-6, Tomahawk and developmental hypersonic weapons with a longer range than those currently in the armories of European militaries.

As such, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told broadcaster Deutschlandfunk that the deployment would address a "very serious gap" in Germany's defense capabilities.

"Exercising these advanced capabilities will demonstrate the United States' commitment to NATO and its contributions to European integrated deterrence," read a joint German-US statement.

'An adequate deterrent'
"We have long been grappling with the question of how we can ensure a deterrent that secures our own alliance territory, but also Germany, with conventional options," Chancellor Scholz told reporters in Washington on Thursday.

"This decision has been a long time in the making and comes as no real surprise to anyone involved in security and peace policy," he added.

The move was also endorsed by Germany's conservative opposition Christian Democrats (CDU) who, given the current unpopularity of Scholz's center-left coalition, could be back in power by the time the missiles are deployed in 2026.

"This is a good news, which shows that the United States is standing by its security guarantees," CDU defense spokesman Johann Wadepuhl told DW. "We need an adequate deterrent against Russia."

Criticism from within Scholz's own party
There has also been criticism of the decision from within the governing coalition, and even from within Scholz's own Social Democratic Party (SPD), where one lawmaker warned of a new "arms race."

"This will not make the world safer," the SPD's Ralf Stegner told the Funke media group. "On the contrary, we are entering a spiral in which the world is becoming increasingly dangerous."

The Greens, who form part of Scholz's coalition along with the neoliberal Free Democrats (FDP), said they and the German public had not been kept adequately informed of the decision and demanded an explanation.

"It can increase fears and leaves room for disinformation and incitement," the Greens' parliamentary security spokeswoman Sara Nanni told the regional Rheinische Post newspaper, adding that Scholz had provided little information on the precise threat posed by Russia.

Katharina Dröge, head of the Greens' parliamentary group, told broadcaster RTL that Scholz should "explain and answer these questions in public."

Criticism from far left and far right
Opposition to the announcement also came from the fringes of German politics, including from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), the traditional socialist Left Party (Die Linke) and the new leftist Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW).

"Chancellor Scholz is not acting in Germany's interest," said Tino Chrupalla, co-leader of the AfD, which continues to oppose German arms deliveries to Ukraine.

"He is allowing Germany's relationship with Russia to be permanently damaged, and we are falling back into the pattern of the East-West conflict," Chrupalla said, adding that the US missile deployment would make "Germany a target."

The Left Party called the decision "highly problematic." Sahra Wagenknecht, the politician after whom the new BSW is named, told Spiegel magazine that the move "increases the danger that Germany itself will become a theater of war."

Back in the 1980s, the deployment of US Pershing ballistic missiles in West Germany, which was then on the front line of the Cold War, prompted widespread pacifist demonstrations. Even after German reunification, US missiles remained stationed in Germany into the 1990s before being slowly removed.

The US currently has nuclear weapons stationed in Germany, which isn't a nuclear power itself, but its conventional capabilities are limited in range.

Russia, whose full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has accelerated Western rearmament, said it was planning "response measures" to contain what it called the "very serious threat" from NATO.

Seoul, South Korea – No rift over cost of U.S. troops in South Korea if Trump elected, says former Trump adviserBy Ju-mi...
10/07/2024

Seoul, South Korea – No rift over cost of U.S. troops in South Korea if Trump elected, says former Trump adviser
By Ju-min Park and Heekyong Yang

South Korea and the U.S. will reach agreement on sharing the cost of U.S. troops in the country if Donald Trump is elected president, even though he is likely to pressure Europe to increase defence spending, a former Trump security adviser said.

During his first presidency Trump accused Seoul of "free-riding" on U.S. military might, with more than 28,000 American troops stationed in South Korea as part of efforts to deter its nuclear-armed neighbour North Korea.

The allies are in talks for a new U.S. troop deal, so-called 12th Special Measures Agreement (SMA), to take effect in 2026. South Korean media has said the aim was for an agreement before the November U.S. presidential election.

"I think that the SMA talks will continue and will reach a settlement that both sides will be content with, when Trump comes to office," Fred Fleitz, a senior National Security Council official during the Trump administration, said in Seoul on Tuesday.

Fleitz said he believed if Trump was elected he would likely pressure European allies to spend more on defence, but not South Korea, citing the "current environment of increased threats from North Korea, from China" as a reason.

Fleitz, who is visiting Seoul for meetings with South Korean researchers and officials including a vice foreign minister, said he was not speaking for Trump and instead offering his own assessment.

Another round of SMA negotiations is set to take place this week in Seoul, according to South Korea's foreign ministry.

Fleitz, vice chair at the America First Policy Institute, a U.S. thinktank, also said he believed Trump would try to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un again in his second presidency.

"I think that the Trump administration has to re-engage Kim," he said, expecting "intensive consultations with Japan and South Korea, probably Taiwan among U.S. allies", to come before a meeting with the North's leader.

Between 2018 and 2019, Trump and Kim met three times in what yielded powerful images but few concrete steps for North Korea's denuclearisation.

His advice for the potential Trump-Kim meeting should be on conditions that North Korea should stop supplying weapons to Russia, Fleitz added.

"I think there will be tough policies against China and North Korea. But I also think there will be dialogue," he said.

Carentan-Les-Marais, France🇺🇸World War II veteran, 100, marries his bride, 96, near Normandy's D-Day beachesBy JOHN LEIC...
09/06/2024

Carentan-Les-Marais, France🇺🇸World War II veteran, 100, marries his bride, 96, near Normandy's D-Day beaches
By JOHN LEICESTER

Together, the collective age of the bride and groom was nearly 200. But World War II veteran Harold Terens and his sweetheart Jeanne Swerlin proved that love is eternal as they tied the knot Saturday inland of the D-Day beaches in Normandy, France.

Their respective ages — he’s 100, she’s a youngster of just 96 — made their nuptials an almost double-century celebration.

Terens called it ″the best day of my life.″

On her way into the nuptials, the bubbly bride-to-be said: “It’s not just for young people, love, you know? We get butterflies. And we get a little action, also.″

The location was the elegant stone-worked town hall of Carentan, a key initial D-Day objective that saw ferocious fighting after the June 6, 1944, Allied landings that helped rid Europe of Adolf Hi**er’s tyranny.

Like other towns and villages across the Normandy coast where nearly 160,000 Allied troops came ashore under fire on five code-named beaches, it’s an effervescent hub of remembrance and celebration on the 80th anniversary of the deeds and sacrifices of young men and women that day, festooned with flags and bunting and with veterans feted like rockstars.

As the swing of Glenn Miller and other period tunes rang out on the streets, well-wishers — some in WWII-period clothes — were already lined up a good hour before the wedding, behind barriers outside the town hall, with a rousing pipe and drum band also on hand to serenade the happy couple.

After both declaring “oui” to vows read by Carentan's mayor in English, the couple exchanged rings.

"With this ring, I thee wed," Terens said.

She giggled and gasped, “Really?”

With Champagne flutes in hand, they waved through an open window to the adoring crowds outside.

“To everybody's good health. And to peace in the world and the preservation of democracy all over the world and the end of the war in Ukraine and Gaza,” Terens said as he and his bride then clinked glasses and drank.

The crowd yelled “la mariée!” - the bride! — to Swerlin, who wore a long flowing dress of vibrant pink. Terens looked dapper in a light blue suit and matching pink kerchief in his breast pocket.

And they're promised a very special wedding-night party: They were invited to the state dinner at the Elysee Palace on Saturday night with President Emmanuel Macron and U.S. President Joe Biden, the mayor said.

The wedding was symbolic, not binding in law. Mayor Jean-Pierre Lhonneur's office said he wasn’t empowered to wed foreigners who aren’t residents of Carentan, and that the couple, who are both American, hadn’t requested legally binding vows. However, they could always complete those formalities back in Florida if they wished.

Lhonneur likes to say that Normandy is practically the 51st state of the USA, given its reverence and gratitude for Allied soldiers and the sacrifices of tens of thousands who never made it home from the Battle of Normandy.

“Love is eternal, yes, maybe," the mayor said, referring to the newlyweds, although his comments also fittingly describe the feelings of many Normans for veterans.

“I hope for them the best happiness together.”

Dressed in a 1940s dress that belonged to her mother, Louise, and a red beret, 73-year-old Jane Ollier was among spectators who waited for a glimpse of the lovebirds. The couple, both widowed, grew up in New York City: she in Brooklyn, he in the Bronx.

“It’s so touching to get married at that age,'' Ollier said. “If it can bring them happiness in the last years of their lives, that’s fantastic.”

The WWII veteran first visited France as a 20-year-old U.S. Army Air Forces corporal shortly after D-Day. Terens enlisted in 1942 and, after shipping to Britain, was attached to a four-pilot P-47 Thunderbolt fighter unit as their radio repair technician.

On D-Day, Terens helped repair planes returning from France so they could rejoin the battle. He said half his company’s pilots died that day. Terens himself went to France 12 days later, helping transport freshly captured Germans and just-freed American POWs to England. Following the N**i surrender in May 1945, Terens again helped transport freed Allied prisoners to England before he shipped back to the U.S. a month later.

Swerlin made it abundantly clear that her new centenarian husband doesn't lack for rizz.

“He's the greatest kisser ever, you know?” she proudly declared before they embraced enthusiastically for TV cameras.

“All right ! That's it for now !” Terens said as he came up for air.

To which she quickly quipped: “You mean there's more later?”

Omaha Beach, France – 80 years of D-Day: Beginning of the end for N**i GermanyIt was the largest such maneuver in histor...
06/06/2024

Omaha Beach, France – 80 years of D-Day: Beginning of the end for N**i Germany

It was the largest such maneuver in history: Operation Overlord, the landing of Allied troops in German-occupied France, had been planned and practiced for months.

Bad weather delayed the operation, but, on June 6, 1944, the time had come. Thousands of ships, supported from the air, took off from the southern coast of England and brought about 150,000 soldiers from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and other Allied countries to the beaches of Normandy. Their goal was to liberate France and then advance on Germany to put an end to N**i rule throughout Europe.

When N**i dictator Adolf Hi**er learned of the invasion, he is said to have gleefully remarked: "As long as they were in England, we couldn't lay our hands on them. Now, we finally have them where we can beat them."

The German army, the Wehrmacht, had indeed been preparing. The coast of occupied France had been heavily secured with bunkers and artillery emplacements, known as the Atlantic Wall. However, the largest German military units were waiting in the wrong place, near Calais, where the English Channel is at its narrowest. The Wehrmacht had fallen for a deliberate deception.

Germans outnumbered, outgunned
It was a battle with heavy losses — on both sides. The Germans fired from their positions at the soldiers coming ashore. Heavy fighting continued inland, behind the beaches and around the villages and towns in the hinterland.

The Germans were outnumbered and outgunned; the tank reserve was their only hope. However, Hi**er left it too late to give the go-ahead for tanks to intervene.

There was a very banal reason for this, military historian Peter Lieb told DW: Hi**er's habit of staying up late and rising up at midday. That's what happened on June 6, 1944.

"That morning, when the tanks should have been deployed quickly, Hi**er was still asleep," Lieb said. "Nobody dared to wake him up, and the High Command of the Wehrmacht did not have the courage to disregard an order from the Führer and just go ahead and deploy the tanks."

Hi**er's unconditional order to never retreat was also to prove fatal. His decree was: "There is no evasion and operation here. It is a case of standing firm — hold or die."

The German soldiers were worn down. "The Allies won," Lieb said, "because they had air supremacy, because they had naval supremacy, because they had the element of surprise and because they had been practicing for this day for months."

On August 25, the Allied Forces liberated Paris. The German occupation of France came to an end soon afterward. The death toll in the few weeks after June 6, 1944, was extremely high on both sides — including among French civilians. Tens of thousands of German and Allied soldiers were killed, as well as thousands of civilians.

World War II would continue for more than nine months, claiming millions more lives.

Germany joins commemorations
The commemoration of D-Day has its own history. For the former Allies, June 6 soon became a fixture for commemoration. The ceremonies in Normandy regularly brought together veterans, Britain's Queen Elizabeth II, the American and French presidents and other heads of state and government.

German dignitaries were not invited for a long time — and the country's leaders had no objections. In 1984, Chancellor Helmut Kohl said "There is no reason for the German chancellor to rejoice when others celebrate their victory in a battle in which tens of thousands of Germans perished miserably."

"Kohl came from a generation that had very much been shaped by the war," Lieb said. "He was close to members of the generation that had lived through the war. And, for them, it would have been unthinkable to celebrate together with American, British and French soldiers."

Slowly, however, the narrative was established that "the landing in Normandy was also the beginning of the end of the German Reich and thus also the beginning of democracy in Germany."

The first German chancellor to attend the D-Day celebrations was Gerhard Schröder, in 2004. Today, the participation of the former enemy, Germany, has become widely accepted. Chancellor Olaf Scholz also intends to take part.

Russia will not take part in 80th D-Day event
This year, one of the most sensitive issues was whether to invite a representative from Russia. D-Day was the beginning of a "second front" in the war, which Soviet leader Josef Stalin had urgently been calling for following the German attack on the Soviet Union in 1941. With an estimated 20 million dead, the Soviet Union had by far the highest number of casualties of all parties in the war.

To honor the Soviet contribution to the victory over N**i Germany, the French hosts invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the 60th and even the 70th D-Day anniversaries. The latter took place in 2014, just weeks after the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"After 1989/'90, there was great euphoria that the world would be more peaceful, that Russia, as a democratic state, would adopt the Western model of society," Lieb said. That, he added, changed completely with the start of Russia's full-fledged war on Ukraine in 2022.

Despite criticism from the US, UK and Germany, French leaders had considered inviting the Russian ambassador to attend this year's 80th commemoration ceremony, but ultimately decided against it.

"In view of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, which has intensified in recent weeks, the conditions are simply not right," read a message from the office of French President Emmanuel Macron. Russia will not have a representative at the event.

Instead, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will travel to France. Together with Macron, US President Joe Biden, Britain's Prince William, Germany's Olaf Scholz, some of the last surviving veterans and other state guests, he will commemorate 80 years since the original D-Day on the beaches of Normandy.

Address

Daegu

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when USAG Daegu posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram