08/05/2026
Kannn. Nampak sudah ....
Mencabar sudah ...
Kuasa Sultan dicabar . .. Sekali Sultan Titah Bubar DUN dn Parlimen . Hemmm.. sedih Malaysia ku . Inikah yg kamu org Banggakan Undikan Mereka .
Titah Sultan Berpotensi Dicabar Di Mahkamah - Ronnie Liu
Oleh Mynewshub
KUALA LUMPUR - Bekas pemimpin DAP, Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew mendakwa satu titah atau kenyataan oleh Sultan Selangor mengenai penternakan babi tidak secara automatik menjadi 'undang-undang mutlak' dengan sendirinya.
Beliau mendakwa, di Malaysia termasuk di Selangor, sebarang dasar kerajaan atau larangan masih perlu mematuhi Perlembagaan negeri Selangor dan Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia.
"Penternakan babi kebanyakannya berada di bawah bidang seperti kerajaan tempatan, penggunaan tanah, peraturan alam sekitar, kesihatan awam, pelesenan oleh pihak berkuasa negeri.
"Oleh itu, untuk larangan di seluruh negeri dikuatkuasakan secara sah, ia lazimnya memerlukan tindakan oleh kerajaan negeri seperti penggubalan undang-undang, peraturan, dasar tanah atau keputusan pelesenan dan bukan sekadar kenyataan diraja semata-mata," dakwanya menerusi satu kenyataan berbahasa Inggeris di media sosial hari ini.
Ronnie Liu seterusnya berkata, sultan mempunyai pengaruh Perlembagaan dalam perkara melibatkan Islam dan adat Melayu dan kerajaan negeri selalunya mengambil pandangan diraja dengan sangat serius dari sudut politik dan pentadbiran.
Bagaimanapun, dakwanya, sama ada sesuatu larangan itu berperlembagaan atau tidak bergantung kepada bagaimana ia dilaksanakan termasuk sama prosedur undang-undang yang betul dipatuhi.
Dakwa beliau, ia juga termasuk sama ada melanggar hak perlembagaan (seperti hak kesamarataan, hak harta atau hak menjalankan perniagaan yang sah) dan sama ada mahkamah memutuskan ia selaras dengan undang-undang Malaysia.
"Dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia, mahkamah merupakan pihak yang mentafsir soal perlembagaan, bukan Sultan bertindak secara bersendirian.
"Oleh itu, sesuatu titah berpotensi dicabar di mahkamah jika ada pihak berhujah bahawa ia bercanggah dengan perlindungan perlembagaan atau melangkaui kuasa undang-undang," dakwanya lagi. - MYNEWSHUB
Berikut kenyataan penuh beliau di muat naik di media sosial hari ini:
[as forwarded...
A decree or statement by the Sultan of Selangor about pig farming would not automatically become “absolute law” on its own. In Malaysia, including Selangor, any government policy or ban must still comply with:
* the Constitution of Selangor, and
* the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
Pig farming falls mainly under areas such as:
* local government,
* land use,
* environmental regulation,
* public health,
* licensing by state authorities.
So for a statewide ban to be legally enforceable, it would normally require action by the state government — such as laws, regulations, land policies, or licensing decisions — not merely a royal statement alone.
At the same time, the Sultan does have constitutional influence in matters involving Islam and Malay customs, and state governments often take royal views very seriously politically and administratively.
Whether a specific ban is constitutional would depend on:
* how it was implemented,
* whether proper legal procedures were followed,
* whether it violated constitutional rights (such as equality, property rights, or lawful business rights),
* and whether courts find it consistent with Malaysian law.
In Malaysia’s legal system, courts ultimately interpret constitutionality — not the Sultan acting alone. So a decree could potentially be challenged in court if someone argues it conflicts with constitutional protections or exceeds legal authority.
[07/05, 9:57 pm] Pinakin: The main provision usually referred to is Article 8 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia — the equality clause.
Key parts include:
* Article 8(1):
“All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.”
* Article 8(2):
Prohibits discrimination against citizens on grounds such as religion, race, descent, place of birth, or gender in certain matters.
However, Article 8 does not specifically say “no discrimination in business.”
Instead, people rely on Article 8 generally when arguing that a law or government action unfairly discriminates against certain businesses or groups.
There are also important constitutional exceptions and qualifications, including:
* special position provisions under Article 153,
* state powers over land and local government,
* licensing and regulatory powers,
* public health and environmental regulations.
So in practice:
* A business owner can challenge a government restriction as discriminatory under Article 8.
* But the government may still lawfully regulate or restrict certain industries if the restriction has a legal basis and is applied constitutionally]
Sumber Info/Foto: Akaun Media Sosial Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew
