24/09/2025
The paradox of L. williamsii
The northern and southern forms of Lophophora williamsii are the same species but can’t interbreed. Why?
A recent comment from a group member raised a crucial question: if the northern and southern forms of Lophophora williamsii can’t interbreed, how can they be considered the same species?
This question gets to the heart of a fundamental concept in biology, providing a perfect opportunity to dive deeper into how species evolve and how we define them.
⸻
The Classic Definition of a Species
The concept being referred to is the Biological Species Concept, which was formulated by the evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr. By this definition, two organisms are the same species if they’re able to interbreed and produce fertile offspring.
At first glance, the impossibility of hybridization between the two forms of Lophophora williamsii seems to contradict this rule. However, the natural world is far more complex than our simple definitions.
⸻
An Example of Evolution in Action
The northern and southern forms of Lophophora williamsii are a perfect example of allopatric speciation, a process where a new species evolves due to geographic isolation.
For thousands of years, the Lophophora populations in northern and southern Mexico have been separated by vast distances and natural barriers. This isolation allowed each population to evolve independently, accumulating unique genetic differences.
These differences didn’t just show up as visible variations (morphology), but also at the reproductive level. Over time, reproductive barriers emerged that prevent hybridization, even if the two forms were to be found in the same area.
This process of evolutionary divergence is so advanced that even if the ranges of the two populations were to touch today, in a phenomenon known as secondary contact, the reproductive barriers would remain effective, preventing hybridization.
⸻
The Current Status of L. williamsii
Despite their inability to interbreed, the two forms are still classified as the same species, Lophophora williamsii. This is because the evolutionary process separating them isn’t yet complete.
They represent a significant snapshot of speciation in progress, a moment where evolution has already created reproductive isolation, but the differences aren’t yet great enough to justify a complete taxonomic separation.
This example reminds us that scientific definitions are tools to help us understand the natural world, but nature itself is a dynamic, continuous process that doesn’t always fit neatly into our boxes.
⸻
For more details on the genetic, morphological, and distribution differences, you can check out our previous article:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1CMxqe9Bcb/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Text by identification (tag refuse to work)