27/01/2026
Yesterday driving home I took photos of a couple of maize paddocks along the roadside I provided recommendations for which defies the industry standard fertiliser regime of 150-250Kg N/Ha, 30-60Kg P, 200-300Kg K. For these paddocks in particular (the photos don’t do justice from where I was standing on the outskirts), NO nitrogen or phosphorus was applied at planting.
Total inputs included aglime, 40Kg potassium plus sulphur & magnesium worked into the soil pre-drilling, followed up with 35Kg nitrogen & 75Kg additional K as a side dress.
To recap, this is a total of 35Kg N & 115Kg K, no P yet a big, healthy-looking crop.
Volcanic soils depending on origin are often very high in phosphorus & potassium but low in magnesium. This part of the farm is very high in P, low-end K with low Mg. The key with many volcanic soils is identifying low magnesium availability; without addressing the root of the problem (the low capacity for photosynthesis), fertiliser efficiency would be significantly less with significantly more N & K required to ‘cover up’ the bigger issue & profits reduced.
Magnesium (as with calcium) is generally incorrectly judged solely on its quantity with no interpretation or understanding to its availability – these are two different measures, when only one is focused on, crop/pasture/animal performance will continue to be limited.
The other misconception is maize needs copious amounts of potassium however this is incorrect. Maize will take up as much potassium as you throw at it however it has been very well proven over & over that increasing potassium above that of its growth requirement does NOT increase yield. It does however reduce crop profitability as well as animal health, assuming the end outcome is for feed.
In instances where the soil potassium reserves are not high, crop K input should only be that to ensure it is not a limiting factor & distributed to match growth (less than 5% of K requirement is taken up within the first month of planting). If soil K needs replenishing to maintain levels for future performance, post-harvest application is recommended to avoid luxury (unnecessary) uptake.
For pastoral systems, there is absolutely no benefit to maintain soil potassium above that of the plant minimum as this is already over double the requirement to meet animal dietary needs with excess K detrimentally impacting calcium, magnesium & sodium balance along with causing digestive irritability/scouring & leaky gut (the latter will be the topic of my posts in coming days).
; ; ; ;