ZigZag Educational Psychology

ZigZag Educational Psychology I provide neuro-affirming assessment (for SLD, autism, ADHD, giftedness) and therapy.

I particularly enjoy working with people post-diagnosis, and/or those who experience anxiety, phobias, selective mutism etc.

19/04/2026
19/04/2026

When something upsetting happens, people use their thoughts to help manage how they feel. That's called "cognitive emotion regulation." Think of it as the mental moves you make AFTER a bad moment to cope with it.

Some thought patterns are usually HELPFUL (called adaptive):

- Acceptance ("okay, this happened, I can sit with it")

- Refocus on planning ("what can I do next?")

- Positive reappraisal ("maybe I'll learn something from this")

- Positive refocusing ("let me think about something nice instead")

- Putting into perspective ("this isn't the end of the world")

Other thought patterns are usually UNHELPFUL (called maladaptive):

- Self-blame ("this is all my fault")

- Other-blame ("it's their fault")

- Rumination (replaying it over and over in your head)

- Catastrophizing ("this is a disaster, and nothing will ever be okay")

Older studies said kids with ADHD use more unhelpful thoughts and fewer helpful ones. But those studies had some weak spots.

So this research team wanted a cleaner look. Their main questions:

1. Do kids/teens with ADHD really use fewer adaptive and more maladaptive thinking strategies than kids without ADHD?

2. Does that connection still hold when you account for depression, anxiety, conduct problems, and autism traits?

3. Do boys and girls differ? Do older and younger kids differ?

HOW THEY DID IT

They measured cognitive emotion regulation in two different ways, which is one of the study's strengths.

For the first method, teens answered questions about how they usually handle upset feelings. This captured what the teens THOUGHT they usually did.

For the second method, kids looked at 14 upsetting photos on a computer screen. The photos showed scary or sad things, like dangerous animals or disasters. For each photo, kids looked at it for 8 seconds, rated how upset they felt on a scale of 1 to 9, and then talked out loud about what they were thinking

Two trained researchers listened to the recordings and marked which thinking strategies each kid actually used.

This captured what the kids actually DID in the moment, not just what they think they usually do.

Parents also filled out forms about their child's depression, anxiety, autism traits, and behavior.

Then they ran statistical analyses (linear regressions and generalized linear models) to look for patterns, with TWO models: one adjusting for basic stuff like s*x, age, and SES, and a second model that also adjusted for depression, anxiety, conduct, and autism traits. They also used a Benjamini-Hochberg correction, which is a statistical method that makes the bar higher when you're testing lots of things at once, to reduce false positives.

WHAT THEY FOUND

In the initial findings before adjusting for other conditions they found:

- Kids with ADHD self-reported using FEWER adaptive (helpful) strategies

- Kids with ADHD self-reported using MORE maladaptive (unhelpful) strategies

- In the photo task, kids with ADHD used 46% fewer adaptive strategies than controls

So on the surface, the expected pattern showed up.

But interestingly, after the researchers took depression, anxiety, and other conditions into account, almost all of those differences actually DISAPPEARED.

What that suggests: the emotion dysregulation that researchers usually blame on ADHD may actually be more about CO-OCCURRING DEPRESSION than about ADHD itself.

Depressive symptoms were strongly and consistently linked to the use of maladaptive strategies, and depression often goes hand-in-hand with ADHD.

One finding stayed strong the whole way through. Kids with ADHD used acceptance much less than kids without ADHD. Acceptance means sitting with a hard feeling instead of fighting it or running from it. This pattern held up no matter what else the researchers checked, which suggests low use of acceptance may be a real, unique feature of ADHD.

A few other findings are worth knowing.

Girls used more unhelpful thoughts than boys and used less acceptance than boys.

Older teens used more unhelpful thoughts than younger teens, with self-blame and rumination going up with age.

And kids with ADHD felt just as upset by the photos as kids without ADHD. The difference was in how they handled the feelings, not how strong the feelings were.

AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS

The researchers had two main takeaways.

First, depression may matter more than we thought. When a kid with ADHD is struggling to manage emotions, depression might be the real driver underneath. That means it's worth looking for depression, not just assuming the emotion struggles come from ADHD.

Second, low use of acceptance may be a real ADHD thing. Kids with ADHD seem to have extra trouble sitting with hard feelings, separate from any depression. The researchers also noted that girls and older teens showed different patterns that future studies should look at more closely.

Why this matters

Two things stand out. First, ADHD is rarely just ADHD. When a child with ADHD is struggling emotionally, it's worth checking for depression underneath. The emotion piece may improve when the depression is addressed, not just when ADHD is the focus.

Second, acceptance is something kids with ADHD seem to have a harder time with. Knowing that could be helpful when considering what's going on for these kids when they're having a hard time, and opens up new conversations about how best to support them.

OUR THOUGHTS

Taking a neuroaffirming approach here may start by questioning the premise that unhelpful thinking patterns need to be fixed or replaced. A lot of traditional approaches treat kid's thoughts as distorted or wrong, and the job of therapy is to correct them.

That framing can feel invalidating, especially for kids whose thoughts often reflect real experiences of being misunderstood, overwhelmed, or treated as a problem.

Instead, it may be more helpful to focus on WHY certain thinking patterns show up in the first place. Rumination and self-blame in kids with ADHD often come from years of feedback that they're too much, or not enough, or lazy, or careless, or difficult. The thoughts aren't irrational. They're learned from the environment. Addressing the environment (school, family, how adults respond to the child) may matter as much or more than working on the thoughts themselves.

Language and self-understanding matter too, but offered, not imposed on them. Giving a kid words for what their brain does "sometimes brains like ours do this thing where they replay stuff, and it can feel tiring or overwhelming." Helping them notice what their brain is doing, without judgment or an expectation to change it.

Sensory and nervous system support probably belongs in the conversation too. A dysregulated body produces dysregulated thoughts. If a kid is chronically under-rested, overstimulated, or masking all day at school, their thinking patterns are downstream of that. Addressing sensory needs, rest, movement, and reducing mask load may do more for thinking patterns than any cognitive work.

Connection matters. Co-regulation with a trusted adult is probably more powerful than any self-directed thinking strategy, especially for younger kids.

Teaching adults how to BE with a dysregulated kid, rather than talking the kid OUT of their feelings, could help.

And for the acceptance piece specifically, the study's finding was that kids with ADHD use less acceptance as a thinking/coping strategy... But acceptance isn't just a skill you teach. It often grows from being accepted. Kids who've been told their whole lives that their way of being is wrong have a hard time accepting themselves or their feelings. Working on the acceptance they RECEIVE from adults around them may be foundational.

**Note: This graphic is a screenshot of recently published research. It shows the title of the study, the authors' names, and the DOI link. The caption summarizes the research and the researchers' findings and conclusions. This is shared strictly as information to our audience and is not intended as an endorsement or a claim that the research findings are definitive.**

[ Image Description: Screenshot of a research article listing from the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, Volume 26, Issue 1, January to March 2026, article number 100660. The title reads "Adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation in child- and adolescent ADHD." Authors listed are Rebecka Astenvald, Matilda A. Frick, Johan Lundin Kleberg, and Johan Isaksson. The Think Sensory logo appears at the bottom on a dark teal background.]

30/12/2025
18/10/2025
11/09/2025
19/08/2025

ABA -what is it and why is it controversial?

When the word ABA (Applied Behaviour Analysis) comes up in conversations about autism, it almost always sparks strong reactions. Some parents are told it’s the “gold standard” therapy. Others hear stories from autistic adults who say it was deeply harmful. So which is it?

To start with, ABA is a behaviour-based approach. It was originally developed in the 1960s to teach new skills and reduce behaviours seen as “undesirable.” This history matters, because back then the focus was often on making autistic children appear less autistic. Hand-flapping, rocking, avoiding eye contact, or having strong interests were seen as problems to be fixed rather than natural parts of being autistic.

For many autistic adults, especially those who grew up in intensive ABA programmes, the experience was not one of support but of suppression. They describe being trained to hide who they were, to ignore their own needs, and to prioritise compliance over wellbeing. Some compare it to masking on demand, which can lead to anxiety, trauma, and a loss of self-identity.

This is why so many in the autistic community view ABA with suspicion or outright opposition. They’re not rejecting the idea of support; they’re rejecting the idea that the goal of support should be to erase autistic traits.

That said, not all therapy that comes under the “ABA” umbrella looks the same. Some modern practitioners emphasise naturalistic teaching, play-based interaction, and following a child’s interests. The problem is that ABA has such a wide spectrum of practice that one family’s positive experience can sit right alongside another person’s traumatic one—and both are true.

So where does that leave parents?

I think the most important questions aren’t “Is it ABA or not?” but:
• Does this intervention respect my child’s autonomy?
• Is the goal to make my child fit in, or to help them thrive as who they are?
• Are their natural ways of communicating, moving, or playing being supported—or suppressed?
• Will this help my child feel safe, confident, and understood?

For me, any therapy or support should be neuroaffirming and trauma-informed. That means it should celebrate autistic ways of being, support communication in whatever form it takes, and help a child navigate the world without denying them their identity.

There are approaches out there—speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, play-based interaction, SCERTS, relationship-based models—that can build skills and confidence without asking children to mask. These can be used in empowering, compassionate ways.

Parents are often put under huge pressure to “do something” quickly after a diagnosis. But doing something isn’t always better than doing nothing if that “something” leaves a child feeling less safe, less accepted, or less themselves.

ABA is complicated. It has a history that cannot be ignored, but also a present where it looks very different in different places. What matters most is not the label on the programme but the impact it has on the child. If it builds joy, self-esteem, and authentic communication, it’s moving in the right direction. If it builds compliance and shame, it’s not.

At the end of the day, autistic children don’t need to be trained out of autism. They need to be supported, respected, and celebrated for who they are.

Emma
The Autistic SENCo
♾️

Photo: One of the derelict Crofts that we stopped at on our NC500 journey. Number 4 stayed in the car because, ‘Only you what to look at that old house Mum.’

I think it’s gorgeous. I instantly fell in love with it. Lick of paint and it’ll be fine… 😂

17/08/2025

So true. Thanks Perth Children's Occupational Therapy.

09/08/2025

Does your kid have a psych assessment coming up?

This is a simple way to prepare them.

Learning more about your brain doesn't have to be a scary or negative thing. The more we know, the better we can take care of ourselves.

Yes?

Em 🌈

15/07/2025

I think this one speaks for itself.

Em 🌈

08/07/2025

Our post on SUPPORTING A CHILD WHO MASKS WITH AFTER SCHOOL RESTRAINT COLLAPSE has gone viral this week.

To that end I have condensed the information into a handy visual - save it on your phone, print it off as a reminder.

Our 'Masking, The Toolkit' is available now as a downloadable resource from The Contented Child at https://thecontentedchild.co.uk/product/masking-the-toolkit/

Niki ❤️

Address

Upper Hutt

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when ZigZag Educational Psychology posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to ZigZag Educational Psychology:

Share

Category