04/05/2026
An Inquiry into the Inevitability of Conflict: The Inner and Outer Terrains
The Unyielding Soil
The seed of discord is not sown in dirt,
But in the deeper strata of the mind,
Where anxiety and fear take root and fractured truths convert
To weapons that the conscious self must find.
A shadow grows where light refused to tread,
And nations, like the psyche, come to fight
The very ghosts they thought were safely dead,
And dress their terror in the cloth of right.
The earth does not compel the plough to tear;
The hand that holds it makes the choice to rend.
So stands the question in the echoing air:
Is war two-legged (human) nature, or it’s choice to end?
To go deeper, we must move beyond political theory to examine the foundational substrate: two-legged (human) consciousness, and its dis-integration.
The critical premise is that mind, brain, and consciousness are not synonymous in this context.
Brain is the biological, physical organ.
Mind is the emergent phenomenon of brain activity, encompassing thought, emotion, feeling, and memory.
Consciousness is the fundamental field of awareness within which mind and brain arise; it is the ground of being.
War is deemed inevitable when the two-legged (human) mind, shaped by evolutionary biology (brain) and conditioned by trauma, identity, and scarcity, operates in a state of alienation from its source—pure consciousness.
This split projects internal conflict onto the external world.
Scientific & Constructive Commentary:
Modern neuroscience and social psychology and psychiatry confirm that the brain has evolved with a strong negativity bias and tribal ‘us vs. them’ patterning for survival.
However, neuroplasticity proves these patterns are not destiny.
The constructive view holds that just as the brain can be wired for threat detection, it can be rewired for empathy, compassion and cooperation through deliberate practice, education, and changed social, cultural, religious or spiritual narratives.
Psychoanalytical Point of View:
Dr. Freud posited Thanatos, the death drive, as a primal instinct towards aggression and destruction, perpetually at war with Eros (the life drive).
War is the societal eruption of repressed individual psychic conflict, where the ‘id’ is projected onto the external enemy, and the ‘superego’ becomes the righteous cause.
Jungian Point of View:
War is the catastrophic externalisation of the unintegrated Shadow.
Nations, like individuals, refuse to acknowledge their own darkness (arrogance, ignorance, greed, cruelty, anxiety, fear) and instead project it onto the ‘enemy’, whom they then must destroy.
The collective unconscious becomes saturated with archetypes of the Hero, the Demon, and the Sacrifice, fuelling war narratives.
Individuation on a mass scale—integrating the Shadow—is the antidote.
Gestalt Point of View:
War is the ultimate expression of unfinished business and boundary distortion at a collective level.
Projection & "Othering":
The "enemy" becomes the figure onto which a nation projects its own disowned aggression, fear, guilt, and shame.
This creates a rigid, polarised figure-ground where the "self" is all good (ground) and the "other" is all bad (figure), eliminating the nuanced whole.
Contact Boundary Violation:
Healthy contact between groups breaks down. Instead of dialogue and mutual adjustment, the boundary becomes a barrier of dehumanisation, or is violently destroyed through aggression.
Avoidance of Authentic Need:
The underlying collective needs (security, respect, purpose, meaning) remain unacknowledged.
War becomes a destructive, deflective "solution" to avoid the anxiety or fear of true contact and internal conflict resolution.
Field Theory Perspective:
War emerges from the entire organism-environment field.
It's not caused by one side alone, but by the rigid, toxic patterns of interaction in the larger field (historical grievances, economic tensions, cultural, religious or spiritual narratives) that prevent creative adjustment.
Awareness & Responsibility:
The Gestalt antidote would be to increase awareness of the projection mechanism and own the disowned parts.
Peace requires restoring fluid contact boundaries, completing the unfinished business through dialogue, and integrating the "enemy" back into the two-legged (human) field as part of a larger, complex whole.
In essence, while Dr. Jung frames war as a projection of the unintegrated Shadow from the collective unconscious, Gestalt psychology frames it as a breakdown in contact and awareness within the collective organism-environment field.
Both see the "enemy" as a carrier of disowned parts of the self, but Gestalt emphasises the here-and-now process of boundary distortion and the avoidance of authentic contact that could lead to true resolution.
Holistic & Integrated Point of View:
War represents a profound systemic failure of the whole.
It is a symptom of a fragmented system where political, economic, ecological, psychological and spiritual domains are treated in isolation. Health requires integration: seeing the soldier, the leader, the resource, and the grievance as part of a single, interactive field.
Resolution must address all layers simultaneously.
Philosophical Point of View:
From Hegel, conflict is a dialectical engine of history (thesis-antithesis-synthesis).
For Hobbes, war is the natural state in the absence of a Leviathan.
Eastern philosophies like Taoism see war as the ultimate expression of imbalance, of Yang overpowering Yin without recourse.
A Spinozian view suggests war arises from inadequate understanding; we are determined by passions until we achieve rational insight.
Energetic Point of View:
Conflict is a manifestation of blocked, stagnant, or chaotic energy (Prana) at a collective scale.
Societies build up pressure through suppressed trauma, injustice, and unexpressed life force, which eventually discharges violently as war.
Sustainable peace requires collective practices to circulate, harmonise, and transmute this energy.
Metaphysical Point of View:
War is an expression of the illusion of separateness.
Metaphysics posits that underlying apparent multiplicity is a fundamental unity.
When this is forgotten, the perceived ‘other’ can be objectified and attacked.
War is, therefore, a form of profound metaphysical error.
Esoteric Point of View:
Esoteric traditions speak of psychic toxins or elemental imbalances accumulating in the collective astral field.
These dense thought-forms (e.g., hatred, fanaticism) can be manipulated or can spontaneously ignite, drawing nations into conflict.
Initiation involves learning to perceive and purify these subtle fields.
Spiritual Point of View:
At its core, war is a spiritual crisis—a forgetting of the divine essence in all beings.
It is the culmination of attachment to ego, territory, doctrine, and dogma.
True spirituality recognises the battleground is within; outer peace is a reflection of inner peace cultivated through empathy, compassion, forgiveness, and realisation of non-duality.
Druidic Point of View:
Druid teachings sees two-leggedness (humanity) as an integral part of the natural web.
War is a catastrophic rupture in this web, a disharmony between the tribe and the land (nemeton), and a failure of sacred hospitality. Peace is maintained through right relationship, honouring ancestors and the spirits of place, and resolving disputes through ritual and sagacious and bardic wisdom under the sacred grove.
Vedic A***n (Pre-Hindu) Point of View:
The Rigvedic worldview does not see war (Samgrama) as inevitable but as a last resort within the cosmic order (Rta).
Conflict arises from Adharma—deviation from natural law and duty (Svadharma).
The inner battle is primary: the Devas (illuminating forces) against the Asuras (contracting forces) within consciousness.
Any violent conflict illustrates war as the tragic, inevitable outcome when consciousness is clouded by desire (k**a) and attachment (moha).
Shamanic Point of View:
War is a manifestation of soul loss and spiritual possession at a collective level.
When a people lose their collective soul (connection to ancestry, land, meaning and purpose), hostile spirits (of rage, lack, vengeance) can take hold.
The shaman’s role is to journey to restore soul, retrieve lost power, and mediate between the spirits of the conflicting parties to restore balance.
Entheogenic Point of View:
Certain sacred plants, mushrooms, lichens and other natural medicines can dissolve the egoic boundaries that create the ‘other’.
They can induce a direct experience of interconnected consciousness, showing war to be a fratricidal madness.
Historically, they have been used ceremonially to forge bonds or foresee conflict, suggesting that expanded states of awareness can reveal pathways to peace invisible to the ordinary, defensive mind.
Conclusion:
War is deemed inevitable when analysed through the lens of a fragmented consciousness—be it psychological, political, or metaphysical.
Its drivers are real in the relative world, but they are not ultimate.
They are symptoms of a deeper dis-ease: the separation of the individual and collective mind from its source in undivided awareness. Each perspective offered here is a map of that terrain of separation, and also hints at the integrative healing and potential cures required.
Inevitability is a story the traumatised mind tells itself.
The possibility of peace rests on the arduous, conscious work of moving from fragmentation to wholeness, within and without.
The Integration
Not in the treaty signed in hallowed halls,
Nor in the force that makes the rival yield,
But in the quiet where the shadow falls
And we confront the battlefield we sealed
Within our hearts. The true armistice begins
When, breath by breath, we recognise the face
Of brother in the foe, and dissolve the misdeeds
Projected from our own, forgotten grace.
The web is mended not by might’s decree,
But by the hand that feels the tender thread
Connecting every soul to you and me,
And every thought of separation shed.
So ask not if the outer war must be,
But if the inner one can end, and see.
©DrAndrewMacLeanPagonMDPhD2026
( द्रुविद् रिषि द्रुवेद सरस्वती Druid Rishi Druveda Saraswati)
All rights reserved.
