30/04/2026
As the very first batch that was almost denied MSRS slots, we fought long enough to have those slots restored to us. And now, to face further delays in the release of funds because of a bureaucratic system is not just frustrating, it is a serious failure. It is a shame that a program meant to support future doctors of the people cannot even deliver on its basic promise.
We have been patient since February. We complied with every requirement on time, in good faith, because we were told this system would support us. Instead, we are the ones absorbing the consequences of its failures.
While offices cite late processing, tax season, and so-called privilege leave, students are left to shoulder real, daily costs. We are the ones choosing between meals and transport, taking on debt just to stay in school, and pushing through training without the support that was already promised.
These are not just delays. These are systemic failures that shift the burden onto students who can least afford it.
Gratitude should not be used to soften the truth. Transparency is not enough if it is not matched with urgency and action. If systems can delay, then systems must also be held accountable.
Student welfare is not optional. It is not secondary. It cannot be put on hold.
Those responsible must be held accountable for these delays and their impact on students.
Release the MSRS funds now. Support future doctors!
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
There is an exhaustion that does not come from duty hours, nor from sleepless nights in the wardsโbut from waiting.
We, the scholars under the MSRS program, write with urgency and with hope: that the continued delay in the release of our stipend be addressed without further postponement.
We acknowledge, with gratitude, the offices and individuals who have worked behind the scenes to facilitate this process. We know that systems are not simple, and that effort has been exerted. For this, we thank you.
But gratitude should not silence reality.
Many of us are now burdened by mounting obligationsโgraduation fees that cannot wait, debts incurred just to stay afloat, and the looming financial demands of PGI-ship preparations. What was meant to support our journey in medicine has, in its delay, become another source of anxiety we must carry alongside our responsibilities as students and future physicians.
Recently, we were informed of the factors contributing to the delay in the release of our MSRS stipend:
โข Late processing from CHED, resulting in delayed disbursement
โข The assigned accountant being on privilege leave
โข The accounting office prioritizing tax season requirements
โข The need for meticulous checking to ensure accurate distribution
These are valid explanations. We recognize them, and we appreciate the transparency extended to us by the administration and the staff assisting in this process.
But understanding is not the same as acceptance.
Because while these reasons explain why there is delay, they do not erase what the delay is costing students.
If late endorsement leads to late disbursementโthen there must be safeguards to prevent students from absorbing the burden of systemic lag.
If personnel are on leaveโthen there must be continuity mechanisms in place, because student support cannot pause when offices do.
If tax season demands priorityโthen where does that leave student welfare in the hierarchy of urgency?
If accuracy requires timeโthen why does efficiency not accompany it, especially for funds that students depend on for survival?
We compliedโon time, completely, and in good faithโwith every requirement asked of us. Because we understood that delays on our part would have consequences.
It is difficult, then, not to ask: when the delay is no longer ours, where is the same sense of urgency? Where is the accountability for student welfare?
This is not written in anger, but in steadfast appeal.
Because behind every delayed stipend is a student choosing between transportation and meals, between settling debts and preparing for the next step of training. Behind every delay is a reality that continues, regardless of administrative timelines.
We remain committed to the program. We remain grateful. But we also askโfirmly, sincerelyโthat this concern be treated with the urgency it deserves.
Not just for compliance.
But for dignity, for welfare, and for the very students the program was created to support.
