04/09/2025
In our current era of social media, marked by restlessness and intense competition, we are unfortunately witnessing a rise in serious incidents such as kidnapping, murder and harassment. Research has proven that exposure to violent content can increase a viewer's vulnerability to becoming involved in such acts, either directly or indirectly.
More concerning, however, is the trend of people expressing their emotions aggressively without a proper or professional understanding of the issues at hand.
This is especially clear with harassment, an issue whose definition is often complicated by social, religious and cultural contexts that blur its standard meaning. As a result, people are often confused about what actually constitutes harassment and, more importantly, who is the victim and who is the culprit in any given situation. Regardless of a person's background, career, or demographic details, the individual whose personal space has been intruded upon whether through physical molestation, emotional abuse, or an attempt to cause harm is always the victim.
Conversely, the person who imposes themselves on another emotionally, physically or digitally is always the culprit.
A common pattern on social media is that when a harassment case surfaces and gains traction, it often involves a girl reporting as the victim and a boy seeking revenge or trying to get closer to her through harassment. Quickly, people appoint themselves as judges of the situation and rush to scrutinize the girl's character. This is a deeply unfortunate reaction. Regardless of gender, anyone who takes a stand for their character and seeks help should be offered support on a human basis. Instead, observers often begin to justify the incident by inventing narratives, speculating that the girl might have been in a relationship with the guy, that she was "deceitful" or that she was "greedy".
The critical point is that even if two people were in an intimate relationship, no one has the right to harm another person physically or emotionally as a form of revenge.
There is a recognized distinction between healthy and unhealthy aggression. Even within court proceedings, there are rules for how convicted criminals are treated; they retain certain rights on a human level and no individual is granted the authority to punish another. Therefore, the justifications we see on social media, where those who commit violent acts against women including physical attack, r**e, kidnapping or murder are portrayed as having been "forced" into seeking revenge because the woman was deemed "morally wrong" or "misleading", are utterly inhuman.
This type of reasoning risks normalizing such violence in our society.