Dr. Shujaat, ENT Spec

Dr. Shujaat, ENT Spec ENT consultant, with expertise in various surgeries including Nose tharot , ear and head & neck. For more information contact:
shujjaat@gmail.com

Dr. Shujaat Abbas
MBBS, FCPS (Pak), DO-HNS (England). Presently teaches at YM & DC Islamabad & works as ENT consultant at Valley Clinic, Peshawar Rd - Rawalpindi.

13/12/2013

Nasal vetibulitis;

It is the inflammation and / or infection of the nasal vestibule or due to some boil in the area. It is more of a nuisance than anything else. The fact is that upto 40% of the population harbour Staph. Aureus, the causative organism.

Tratment remains the use of antibiotic plus steroid ointment used thee times daily. Stop scratching the nose and follow good personal hygiene.

My Choice: MYCITRACIN CREAM / OINT

06/12/2013

Issue Year : 2012, Issue Number : 3, Issue Month : September
Written By : Anwaar Ul Haq, Muhammad Waqas Ayub*, Shujaat Abbas*, Umar Asim*
Belongs To : Combined Military Hospital Quetta, *Combined Military Hospital Kharian.
COMPARATIVE STUDY – TRANS-SEPTAL BASTING SUTURE VS NASAL PACKING AFTER SUBMUCOPERICHONDRIAL RESECTION
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of nasal packing vs basting (quilting) suture in the control of postoperative bleeding and or haematoma formation and patient compliance of nasal packing after Submucoperichondrial Resection (SMR).
Design: Comparative clinical trial with stratified randomization.
Place and Duration of Study: Department CMH Kharian cantt from January, 2006 to March, 2007.
Materials and Methods: A total of 200 patients were included in the study. One hundred cases had basting suture and 100 had nasal packing. Patients requiring other procedures like cautery, submucosal diathermy, turbinectomy and middle meatal antrostomy were excluded. The two groups were compared for postoperative bleeding, septal haematoma formation, discomfort in nose, and general well being.
Results: Patients with basting suture were free of any discomfort postoperatively which was seen in cases with nasal packing. The two methods were equally effective in preventing excessive bleeding and septal haematoma formation.
Conclusion: We conclude that the basting suture technique avoids the patient from post operative discomfort caused by nasal packing and is equally effective in preventing post operative septal haematoma. As the post-op discomfort is significant in nasal packing we recommend quilting of the mucoperichondrial flaps.
Article
INTRODUCTION
Nasal obstruction is one of the most common complaints in patients attending ENT outdoor. Septal deviations are extremely common, but are not usually severe enough to affect nasal function. Many septal deviations are due to direct trauma. In the absence of any clear history of trauma, birth moulding is considered to be the cause. Deformity of the nasal septum can be classified as spurs, deviations and dislocations1. Only the more severe deviations affect nasal functions and therefore require treatment2. The usual surgical options are submucoperichondrial resection (SMR) and septoplasty3. In SMR deviated septal cartilage and bone are removed leaving 1 cm of caudal and dorsal strip to supplement lower 2/3rd of nose while in septoplasty only the deviated or dislocated part is either straightened or removed sparingly. Septoplasty procedure is preferred especially in young adults and females. After the procedure nasal packing is done either with Bismuth Iodoform Paraffin paste (BIPP) pack or paraffin gauze pack. Quilting suture technique has also been mentioned for the purpose of repair of opposing mucosal tears in the septum4,5. In this study the idea behind nasal packing or quilting suture is to oppose septal flaps and prevent post operative septal haematoma formation and secure haemostasis. The same has been compared in this study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
It was a clinical trial, carried out at CMH Kharian Cantt between January 2006 and February 2007. A total of 200 patients with symptomatic deviated nasal septum (DNS) were included from general population including army personnel reporting to ENT OPD. Both male and female were included. These patients were randomly divided in two groups of 100 each. All these patients underwent general anaesthesia and SMR was carried out. Group I was given BIPP packing post op as is generally done after nasal surgery. Group II was subjected to nasal septal suturing (NSS) using vicryl 3-0. The nasal packs were kept for 24-48 hours depending upon the type of surgery while no packing/wicks were placed in nasal fossae of the 2nd group.
Packs were kept for 24 hrs6.
These patients were observed postoperatively for:
(i) Excessive post op bleeding.
(ii) Septal haematoma formation.
(iii) Discomfort in nose
(iv) General well being.
All the patients were given a questionnaire on first postoperative day to grade their discomfort in the last 24 hrs as
a= No discomfort
b = Mild to moderate discomfort
c = Severe discomfort
The objective criteria behind labelling the discomfort as mild to moderate was that the patient allows the examination with some reluctance, and severe when the patient was afraid of the examination of nose, and had discomfort even without touching the nose.
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 10. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. Chi-square test was applied to compare qualitative variables while independent samples’ t-test was applied to compare quantitative variables. p-value 0.05) and gender (p>0.05).
In group I, 39 % patients claimed grade ‘c’ 61% patients grade ‘b’ and none grade ‘a’. While in group II, 84% patients claimed grade ‘a’, 16% grade ‘b’ and none grade ‘c’. (p-value0.05).
The rate of complications was almost nil following surgery in both the groups. However, the second group was much happier and satisfied as they could easily breathe through the nose and swallowing & taste remained un-altered.
DISCUSSION
DNS is a fairly common problem encountered in ENT OPD. Septoplasty and SMR are performed in most of the symptomatic cases2. Nasal packing is usually done after the surgery. It is a very quick and effective method of securing haemostasis, preventing septal haematoma4,7. The problem with the packing is the discomfort and pain faced by the patient for 24-48 hrs postoperatively. Man is an obligate nose breather and breathing through mouth for 24-48 hrs keeps the patient conscious of breathing by either voluntary efforts or due to dry mouth and continuous throat irritation as most of the patients in group I described in our study8,9. In order to save the patient from this discomfort and pain, basting suture technique is an excellent alternative method. This method is actually used to repair the opposing tears of the septum during septal surgery4. Patients recover smoothly postoperatively and have no discomfort in the nose. The septum can be examined at any time after the operation. Nasal decongestant spray, (Xylometazoline, Oxymeta-zoline) and liquid paraffin drops instillation can be immediately started after the procedure5. Haematoma formation is equally avoided and there is no chance of developing toxic shock syndrome under antibiotic cover, a complication which may be seen with intranasal packing4. Opponents may find increased general anaesthesia time and a procedure requiring expertise10,11. Some surgeons may find it difficult to apply basting sutures as it is a very tedious job12,13 but it becomes easy with proper technique and practice. Yildrim et al studied the technique of nasal packing and nasal septal suturing (NSS) in detail and found statistically better results with suturing as far as patients’ compliance is concerned. In North America and Europe many surgeons prefer basting suture in uncomplicated septal surgery and nasal packing has largely fallen out of favour14. Septal suturing following SMR and septoplasty is therefore, a valid alternative for nasal packing14-16.
CONCLUSION
Although post op nasal packing is very effective for haemostasis the quilting suture is better as for as the patients’ well being is concerned. The amount of relief a patient gets when he can breathe through the nose after septal surgery, a little amount of extra effort by surgeon in applying basting suture is quite worthwhile and highly recommended. It is therefore suggested that nasal septal suturing be adopted as an alternative to intra nasal packing.
Reference
1. David Brain. The Nasal septum; Scott Brown’s Otolaryngology. 1997: New Sixth edition; 04/11/02-03
2. Vainio-Mattila J: Correlations of nasal symptoms and signs in random sampling study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1974; 318: 1-48
3. Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A: The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 1992 Apr; 21(2): 88-9
4. Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y: Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2000Feb;122(2):228-32
5. Reiter D, Alford E, Jabourian Z. Alternatives to packing in septorhinoplasty.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Oct;115(10):1203-5.
6. Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki A, Fr -agiadakis G, Bourolias C, Spanakis I, Chlouverakis G, Bizakis J. Optimal time for nasal packing removal after septoplasty, A Comparative Study. Rhinology.20 Mar;45(1):68-71.
7. Bailey BJ: Nasal septal surgery 1896-1899: transition and controversy.Laryngoscope1997 Jan; 107(1): 10-6
8. Wallace K. Dyer, MD; John Kang, MD, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:973-78
9. Kazkayasi M, Dinçer C, Arikan OK, Kiliç R. The effect of nasal packing and suture technique on systemic oxygen saturation and patient comfort after septoplasty. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis, Derg. 2007;17(6):318-23. Turkish.
10. Ogretmenoglu O, Yilmaz T, Rahimi K, Aksöyek S. The effect on arterial blood gases and heart rate of bilateral nasal packing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Feb;259(2):63-6.
11. Serpell MG, Padgham N, McQueen F, Block R, Thomson M.The influence of nasal obstruction and its relief on oxygen saturation during sleep and the early postoperative period.Anaesthesia. 1994 Jun;49(6):538-40.
12. Awan MS, Iqbal M.Nasal packing after septoplasty: a randomized comparison of packing versus no packing in 88 patients.Ear Nose Throat J. 2008 Nov;87(11):624-7.
13. Al-Raggad DK, El-Jundi AM, Al-Momani OS, Al-Serhan MM, Nawasrah OO, Qhawi MA, Husban AM. Suturing of the nasal septum after septoplasty, is it an effective alternative to nasal packing? Saudi Med J. 2007 Oct;28(10):1534-6.
14. Yildirim A, Yasar M, Bebek AI, Canbay E, Kunt T Nasal septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty.Am J Rhinol. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):599-602.
15. Lemmens W, Lemkens P.Septal suturing following nasal septoplasty, a valid alternative for nasal packing? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2001;55(3):215-21.
16. Nunez DA, Martin FW. An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery.Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991 Dec;16(6):549-50.
Back || Prin

Post operatively, the condition of the patient:
03/12/2013

Post operatively, the condition of the patient:

Issue Year : 2008, Issue Number : 1, Issue Month : March  Written By : Anwaar ul Haq, Shujaat Abbas, M. Waqas Ayub, Umar...
01/12/2013

Issue Year : 2008, Issue Number : 1, Issue Month : March
Written By : Anwaar ul Haq, Shujaat Abbas, M. Waqas Ayub, Umar Asim, Asad Shabbir
Belongs To : Combined Military Hospital, Kharian Cantt

ADVANCED PROPTOSIS AND HYPERTELORISM A COMPLICATION OF FUNGAL SINUSITIS AND EXTENSIVE POLYPOSIS

Article
INTRODUCTION
Nasal polypi are non neoplastic masses of oedematous and pedunclated nasal and / or sinus mucosa. The manifestation of nasal polypi depends on the size of the polyp. Small polypi may not produce symptoms and may be identified only during routine ENT examination. Symptomatic polypi can cause nasal obstruction, postnasal discharge, dull headaches, snoring, and rhinorrhea. Massive polyposis or a single large polyp (eg, antraochoanal polyp that obstructs the nasal cavities and/or nasopharynx) can cause obstructive sleep symptoms and chronic mouth breathing. Rarely, the massive polyposis can alter the craniofacial structures and cause proptosis, hypertelorism, and diplopia which was seen in our case presented below.
CASE REPORT
A young girl of 19 years presented in ENT OPD for nasal obstruction and discharge for the last 05 years, proptosis for the last 03 years and soft swelling of forehead for the last 02 years. On examination of the nose it was full of intranasal polypi with complete nasal obstruction and purulent nasal discharge. Right maxillary sinus was tender. She had marked telecanthus and severe degree of proptosis that her right eye was almost out of orbit; however she did not have diplopia. There was a soft swelling over forehead in the area of frontal sinuses. It was about 4 x 4 cm in size rounded in shape with diffuse margins, non tender with intact and mobile overlying skin. Rest of ENT and systemic examination was normal. Her base line investigations like Blood complete picture, urine routine analysis and X-ray chest was within normal limits. CT scan of head and neck including axial and coronal views of paranasal sinuses showed involvement of bilateral ethmoids, sphenoids, frontal and maxillary sinuses by inflammatory masses which were also seen extending in to the cranial cavity breaking the posterior table of frontal sinuses and pushing the frontal lobe of brain posteriorly. Surgery was planned. Consultation of ophthalmologist and surgical specialist was sought. Patient and her relatives were taken into confidence and a detailed informed written consent was obtained. Craniofacial resection (CFR) was performed. Piece of frontal bone including the frontal sinuses was removed along with the swelling. All the polypi along with pus and greenish cheesy material was removed from both frontal and maxillary sinuses. Both ethmoids and sphenoids were cleared and decompression of both orbits was carried out medially and superiorly. Piece of frontal bone which was removed earlier was cleared of the soft tissue swelling and the greenish cheesy material and was replaced and wound closed in layers. The Polypi and cheesy material was sent for histopathology which turned out to be fungal infection on allergic polyps. Patient was discharged on 7th post operative day with advise of Tab Itraconazole (Omestin) 300 mg daily (Internet drug index Rx list) and a weekly follow up.
DISCUSSION
Multiple polypi can occur with chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, Cystic Fibrosis (CF) or Allergic Fungal Sinusitis (AFS). The pathogenesis of nasal polyposis is unknown. An individual polyp could be an antraochoanal polyp, a benign massive polyp, or any of a number of benign or malignant tumors (eg, encephaloceles, hemangiomas, papillomas, juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas, lymphoma, carcinoma, inverted papilloma). Although the male-to-female ratio is 2-4:1 in adults, the ratio in children is unreported [1,2]. No significant mortality is associated with nasal polyposis. Morbidity is usually associated with altered quality of life, nasal obstruction, anosmia, chronic sinusitis, headaches, snoring, and postnasal discharge. All children with benign multiple nasal polyposis must be evaluated for CF and asthma [3,4]. CT and MRI scans can help diagnose the polypi, define the extent of the lesion in the nasal cavities, sinuses, and beyond; and narrow the differential diagnosis of an unusual polyp. Oral and topical nasal steroid administration is the primary medical therapy for nasal polyposis [5]. Antihistamines, decongestants, and sodium chromoglycate provide little benefit. Immunotherapy may be helpful to treat allergic rhinitis but, when used alone, does not usually resolve existing polypi. Most surgeons today treat polypi surgically but many are sensitive to corticosteroids hence a course of steroids pre operatively is worthwhile [6]. Medical treatment is of little benefit in the presence of fungal sinusitis. Surgical debridement followed by systemic antifungal theapy is the treatment of choice [4].


Surgically polypi can be removed either by simple intranasal polypectomy, endoscopic intranasal ethmoidectomy or external ethmoidectomy. For more extensive disease including chronic sinusitis and recurrence of polyps external frontoethmoidectomy or osteoplastic flap procedure can be done. Craniofacial resection is usually carried out for malignancies of ethmoids extending intracranially. In our case this technique was applied as no other procedure could expose the extent of disease completely [7].
CONCLUSION
This case suggests that the nasal polypi should be diagnosed early and treated aggressively especially in adolescent and young adults as the larger ones increase the chances of craniofacial deformities and operative morbidity.

Reference
1. Andrews AE, Bryson JM, Rowe-Jones JM. Site of origin of nasal polyps: relevance to pathogenesis and management. Rhinology 2005; 43(3): 180-4.
2. Norlander T, Bronnegard M, Stierna P. The relationship of nasal polyps, infection, and inflammation. Am J Rhinol 1999; 13(5): 349-55.
3. Pawliczak R, Lewandowska-Polak A, Kowalski ML. Pathogenesis of nasal polyps: an update. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005; 5(6): 463-71.
4. Kerr A, Booth JB. Scott Brown’s Otolaryngology. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997. p. 6.
5. Iqbal Saqulain G jalisi M. Nasal Polyposis and Fungal sinusitis. Pak J Otolaryngol 1989; 9: 1973-176.
6. Rudack C, Bachert C, Stoll W. Effect of prednisolone on cytokine synthesis in nasal polyps. J Interferon Cytokine Res 1999; 19(9): 1031-5.
7. Stammberger H. Surgical treatment of nasal polyps: past, present, and future. Allergy 1999; 54 Suppl 53: 7-11.

FCPS II  ENT  Examiners group photo taken  on 20th Nov  2013.
29/11/2013

FCPS II ENT Examiners group photo taken on 20th Nov 2013.

22/11/2013

Tip of the Day!

Never try to remove a foreign body from the Ear yourself. Always show to qualified ENT surgeon.

My first love!
17/11/2013

My first love!

17/11/2013

Any queries & comments are welcome!!!!!!!!

01/11/2013

RHINO – ORBITAL MUCORMYCOSIS




Article



Mucormycosis is caused by fungi from the genera Mucor, Absidia, and Rhizopus. Rhino orbital mucormycosis (ROM) is a rare, rapidly progressive opportunistic infection [1]. The organism is found in air, soil, vegetable matter, skin, body orifices and bread mold. People with predisposing systemic diseases like Diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis and immune deficiency disorders are more susceptible to the infection with this organism. The disease was called mucormycosis by Paltauf who described the first case in 1885.

We report a case of rhino – orbital mucormycosis in a diabetic patient, who presented with proptosis, ophthalmoplegia and orbital cellulitis.

REPORT

A 64 Years old female, house wife from Dinga (District Kharian) presented on 4th October, 2006 with complaint of painless drooping of left upper eye lid for the last 15 days. It was followed by pain in left upper molar tooth and painless loss of vision in left eye for last 10 days. Patient was known diabetic for the last 12 years and was on oral hypoglycaemic drugs. Vision in left eye was no perception of light and in right eye, 6/12 improving to 6/9 with glasses. There was left complete ptosis, puffiness of the upper eyelid and facial nerve paresis. On elevating the lid, there was 4 mm proptosis, inferotemporal dystopia and exotropia of 30 prism diopters. There was conjunctival congestion and total ophthalmoplegia in left eye (Fig.1). Rest of anterior segment examination in both eyes was unremarkable. Fundoscopy showed preproliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes and disc congestion in left eye. IOP was 14 mm of Hg in right eye and 16 mm of Hg in left eye. Blood complete picture, urine routine

Correspondence: Lt Col Khawaja Khalid Shoaib, Eye Dept Combined Military Hospital , Mardan

Received: 18 Dec 2007; Accepted 30 April 2008

examination and chest radiograph - PA view were unremarkable. Blood sugar fasting was 10 mmol/L and random was 16 mmol/L. X ray paranasal sinuses followed by CT Scan showed hazy left maxillary sinus. Tissue biopsy was taken from left maxillary sinus and sent for histopathology which confirmed the diagnosis of mucormycosis. Blood glucose was controlled under supervision of medical specialist. Subtotal exentration of left orbit (sparing the eyelids) along with removal of left maxillary sinus was performed (Fig. 2). Inj. Amphotericin B, 12 mg 6 hourly IV was started. Patient recovered postoperatively but unfortunately expired on 7th postoperative day after remaining in coma for 24 hours.



Mucormycosis classically involves the nasal mucosa with invasion of the sinuses, orbit, and brain. The infection can involve the lungs, central nervous system [2], gastrointestinal tract, and skin, but it is probably best known for its rhinocerebral presentation. Most cases of mucormycosis are acute surgical emergencies; however, several cases of subacute or chronic, indolent form have been reported with signs and symptoms developing over 4 weeks. Conditions most commonly associated with mucormycosis include uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic steroid use, metabolic acidosis, organ transplantation, leukemia/lymphoma, treatment with desferoxamine, and AIDS.

The spores of these fungi are ubiquitous and gain entrance to the human body through the mouth and nose. Individuals who are immunocompetent do not develop the disease. In individuals who are immunocompromised, germination of the spores and hyphae formation occurs. The spores attach to the nasal or oral mucosa where massive spore formation occurs, and then the fungus directly invades the blood vessels causing necrotizing vasculitis with thrombosis of the vascular lumina and

resultant infarction. Extension to ethmoid sinuses can lead to orbital involvement. Intracranial spread can occur through the ophthalmic artery, superior orbital fissure, or cribriform plate.

The patient usually presents with headache, nausea, fever and lethargy. The nasal symptoms may include purulent discharge, stuffiness, rhinorrhea, epistaxis and nasal hypoaesthesia. Ophthalmic manifestations may be in the form of unilateral orbital apex syndrome [3], including severe pain, visual loss, total ophthalmoplegia, corneal anaesthesia, and multiple cranial nerve palsies. Orbital cellulitis presenting with early visual loss is one of the hallmarks of mucormycosis. Orbital cellulitis per se is not a requisite, but thrombosis of orbital veins, demonstrable by venography, may account for congestive signs and symptoms. Some degree of proptosis and lid swelling is invariably present.

Mucormycosis should be differentiated from inflammatory pseudotumor, contiguous sinusitis, metastatic tumor, lymphoma, nonspecific granulomatous inflammation (Tolosa-Hunt syndrome), nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cavernous sinus thrombosis, diabetic ophthalmoplegia and migrainous ophthalmoplegia.

Of great clinical importance is the early recognition of an acute orbital inflammatory syndrome in the diabetic patient [4], which should immediately suggest an opportunistic fungal infection such as mucormycosis (phycomycosis). Contrary to popular opinion, uncontrolled acidosis need not be present and in fact, orbitocerebral phycomycosis can occur in otherwise healthy patients especially if there is history of injury compromising the cutaneous barrier [5]. Classically, a progressive and often fatal picture of cavernous sinus thrombosis evolves rapidly.

The standard medical therapy for ROM is amphotericin B in a starting dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day and maximum of 2-4 gram for a period of several weeks to several months, depending on the clinical response, tolerance of the patient and laboratory monitoring especially nephrotoxicity. In our case the patient was obese and critically ill so we started with 0.5 mg/kg/day. Drug toxicities can limit the use of amphotericin in some patients and Posaconazole has been recommended as an alternative [6]. Surgery should be instituted without delay once the condition is diagnosed. Surgical procedures range from debridement of the necrotic mucosa, ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy and radical maxillectomy with orbital exenteration. Both endoscopic and open approaches have been described, in both single and multiple stages.



To conclude, premorbid diagnosis is dependent on a high index of suspicion, immediate sinus mucosal biopsy followed by rapid correction of the underlying metabolic derangements, intravenous amphotericin B and surgical clearance of all infected tissue. Survival depends on the combined effort of the ophthalmologist, otorhinolaryngologist, mycologist, and internist.



1. Akoz T, Civelek B, Akan M. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis: Report of two cases. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 43: 309-12.

2. Munir N, Jones NS. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis with orbital and intracranial extension: a case report and review of optimum management. J Laryngol Otol. 2007; 121: 2: 192-5.

3. Shahid Ali, Israr Ahmad. Mucormycosis causing palatal necrosis and orbital apex syndrome. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 2005; 15: 3: 182-3.

4. Rangel-Guerra R, Martinez HR, Saenz Sàenz C: Mucormycosis. Report of 11 cases. Arch Neurol. 1985; 42: 578,

5. Kimura M, Smith MB , McGinnis MR. Zygomyeosis due to Apophysomyces elegans: Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999; 123: 386-90.

6. Volkenstein S, Unkel C, Neumann A, Sudhoff H, Dermoumi H, Jahnke K, Dazert S. Mucormycosis in paranasal sinuses. HNO. 2007; 08

~Shujaat Abbas

31/10/2013

Presently teaching at-

Yusra Medical & Dental College 'as Asst. Professor ENT.

31/10/2013

Address- Valley Clinic

Peshawar Rd, Rawalpindi...

31/10/2013

Contact- (for appointment)

Dr. Shujaat Abbas

051- 5470070
'or

03003773033

Address

Valley Clinic Peshawar Road
Rawalpindi
45000

Telephone

+92515470070

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dr. Shujaat, ENT Spec posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Dr. Shujaat, ENT Spec:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram