07/15/2021
Sadly, there are numerous misstatements in Mayor Walsifer’s July 15 letter to the Editor, but these three warrant an immediate response:
FIRST
The BFAS NEVER changed its conditions. In its bid for the property, the Borough submitted the same “Certification Regarding Future Development” that all bidders were required to sign. In that certification, the Borough vowed that it would NOT EXPAND THE EXISTING NONCONFORMING USE OF THE PROPERTY. The deed restriction our attorney drafted, simply would have made that condition a restriction so it would be binding on the Borough. THE CONDITIONS DID NOT CHANGE.
SECOND:
The Mayor claims in his letter to the Editor, that the Borough rejected the deed restriction because “not one minor change would be allowed for years to come to the building or the parking lot.” But the Borough Attorney NEVER STATED THE BOROUGH WOULD ACCEPT A LESS RESTRICTIVE CONDITION. The BFAS would, of course, be willing to consider restrictions that would allow alterations and some expansion of the building in the future. Instead, the Borough INSISTED that the property be sold without any restrictions whatsoever on the building’s expansion or future use, and repeatedly threatened to use eminent domain to acquire the property unless the BFAS dropped that condition.
THIRD
The Mayor mischaracterizes as a “rumor” published reports that the Borough rejected the deed restriction because the Borough plans to expand the BFAS building to house all three fire companies, along with the first aid. THIS WAS NOT THEN, AND IT IS NOT NOW, A RUMOR. In fact, this was the exact reason Borough Attorney Jerry Dasti gave to BFAS attorney Ken Pringle during their call on June 11, 2021 when Dasti rejected the proposed deed restriction. See the first sentence of the attached letter of Mr. Pringle dated 7/14/2021 confirming Mr. Dasti’s statement.
Finally, any suggestion that the BFAS has not made its financial information available is untrue. It can be found now, and has been, for quite some time, on our website at "www.belmarfirstaid.com" under Financials.
We hope this somewhat clears up exactly why a Petition is circulating. By taking eminent domain off the table, and opposing the Ordinance 2021-17, it gives all of you a say as to what you want done with the building, instead of letting Walsifer take the building to build and expand on it, exactly like his attorney conveyed to our attorney. If anyone has any questions, please message for clarification. No question is off the table for us to answer. We understand there are a lot of documents, and they are very confusing, and this is very tiring, but the truth is really very simple. The Mayor and his BA will build an emergency sevices hub, combinig 3 fire companies and a first aid department, housing many emergency services vehicles on the corner of 9th and D, if given the opportunity, and they are willing to take this building via eminent domain to do so. Do you want that in your neighborhood? By signing this Petition for a vote in November, you can determine this outcome for your town.