08/23/2025
                                            You know how we all walk around thinking we have "attachment styles"? Like we're anxious or avoidant or secure in relationships?
What if I told you the whole thing came from studying 44 juvenile thieves in 1930s London, then 26 babies in 1960s Baltimore - and from these two tiny studies, psychology decided it understood how ALL humans bond across every culture and time period?...
Including how you show up in your romantic relationships 100 years later...
The audacity is honestly impressive.
Here's what really gets me: These researchers never studied a single healthy, thriving community. They looked at war orphans, institutionalized kids, and isolated suburban American mothers with their babies, then declared "This is human nature!"
Fetch the boxes...
It's like studying how people swim by throwing them overboard, watching them struggle, then teaching swimming based on drowning techniques.
As someone who comes from a Mediterranean culture where multi-generational belonging is just... Tuesday afternoon, I can see what they missed: They weren't studying human attachment. They were documenting to what levels people adapt when you systematically remove all the support structures that make humans feel secure.
Meanwhile, millions of kids worldwide grow up in cultures where these "attachment styles" don't even develop because separation from community simply doesn't happen the way it does here.
Doesn't it make you wonder?
If what we call "secure attachment" is just the best way to cope with systematic abandonment, what does actual human bonding even look like?
The real kicker? Everybody is trying to fix their "attachment issues" instead of asking why a culture would create conditions where children need such defensive strategies just to feel safe with their caregivers.
It's like being handed a map of the sewer system and being told it shows you how to find clean water.
This matters because so many of us have been told our way of connecting is broken, when maybe we're just responding sanely to insane conditions.
What if there's nothing wrong with how you bond? What if the system that taught you to have an "attachment style", and that you need to fix it, is the actual problem?
Link in comments if you want to dive deeper into how we mistake studying dysfunction for studying human nature.
I call it "Teaching from within the wound"
- Nitsan E. Mesika