Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies

Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's oldest societies.

Debates in the Dialectic Chamber on the Top of floor of New West, Mondays at the traditional hour of 7:30 post meridian.

Meet the Philanthropic Speaker, Aakash Palathra!Year: SophomoreMajor/minor: Public Policy and Global StudiesCounty/State...
08/09/2025

Meet the Philanthropic Speaker, Aakash Palathra!

Year: Sophomore

Major/minor: Public Policy and Global Studies

County/State/Country of Origin: Maryland

Favorite Color: Tar Heel Blue

Favorite DiPhi Memory: The All Night Meeting, Spring 2025!!!

Check out the article and join us for lively debate in the Fall!                                                        ...
06/07/2025

Check out the article and join us for lively debate in the Fall!

The Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies are proud to be celebrating our 230th birthday!On June 3rd, 1795, the Debating...
06/03/2025

The Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies are proud to be celebrating our 230th birthday!

On June 3rd, 1795, the Debating Society was founded. Just 29 days later, the Concord Society split off from the Debating Society. These two would become the Dialectic Society and the Philanthropic Society, respectively, just over a year later.

It wasn’t until 1959, however, that these two societies came back together to become the Joint Senate we know and love today.

Please check out our website for more information on our history, our present, and how to join! diphi.web.unc.edu

Happy holidays to all! The Joint Senate of the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies recently hosted its beloved annual ...
12/25/2024

Happy holidays to all! The Joint Senate of the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies recently hosted its beloved annual ball, the December, with the wonderful company of fellow societies and guests. We had many laughs and lots of cheer— and we hope to see you at our spring ball, the April!

We are incredibly grateful for the December leadership and planning of Kaitlyn Maloy, as well as our lovely photographer, Allie Mullin Photography !

Please join us for an alumni reunion! This event will take place in two parts. First, we will host an Alumni Mixer on Sa...
11/04/2024

Please join us for an alumni reunion! This event will take place in two parts. First, we will host an Alumni Mixer on Saturday, November 16th, from 7:00 to 10:00 PM. Second, we are organizing an Alumni Brunch on Sunday, November 17th, at 11:30 AM. The brunch will conclude immediately prior to the Foundation meeting, which will be at 2:00 PM that day.

Please RSVP at go.unc.edu/DiPhi24! Attendance is free, but we recommend a $45 donation to the Walker Portrait Fund. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing you there!

The Joint Senate of the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies cordially invites you to The December, our annual white ti...
11/02/2024

The Joint Senate of the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies cordially invites you to The December, our annual white tie ball, on Saturday, November 23. Professional photography will begin at 4:30 p.m. This will be followed by the dinner and dance for the rest of the evening. It will be a splendid time!

Please RSVP at the link below and venmo $35. BOTH steps are required. Dinner is included in the ticket price.

https://www.paperlesspost.com/go/936jW8qC5V8rbXCMDmjKZ

Good afternoon, all! Tomorrow we will be debating “Resolved: The United States should recognize a cryptocurrency as lega...
04/07/2024

Good afternoon, all! Tomorrow we will be debating “Resolved: The United States should recognize a cryptocurrency as legal tender.” We haven’t debated something directly related to finance/economics in a while, so I’m pretty excited about what people have to offer on the matter. As of March, cryptocurrency and bitcoin are in fact legal in the United States (and in most Western countries); they are also recognized by the IRS as valid property (https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/121515/bitcoin-legal-us.asp #:~:text=Key%20Takeaways,tax%20treatment%20guidelines%20for%20taxpayers). Yet restrictions apply, which some people believe withhold cryptocurrency from its full potential as a competitive form of monetary exchange. Likewise, others firmly oppose its legality.
But hold on–what is cryptocurrency? SUNY-Oswego defines “it as a digital currency, which is an alternative form of payment created using encryption algorithms. The use of encryption technologies means that cryptocurrencies function both as a currency and as a virtual accounting system” (https://www.oswego.edu/cts/basics-about-cryptocurrency #:~:text=What%20is%20cryptocurrency%3F,as%20a%20virtual%20accounting%20system). Crypto (as I’ll refer to it) does not require a bank or third party to be regulated, nor it is insured. It’s also stored in a ‘digital wallet’ (aka a Cloud software or application on your device); as such, if you lose this wallet you lose all of your cryptos. These include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin, all of which label themselves as a “new kind of money” that is rather difficult to convert into traditional forms of currency (i.e. U.S. dollars or Euros) (https://bitcoin.org/en/). Many on social media encourage others to ‘invest’ in the potency of crypto; by lending your crypto to a digital platform, you incur monetary interest via a “yield farming process” (https://www.tokenmetrics.com/blog/how-to-make-money-with-cryptocurrency #:~:text=6.-,Earning%20Interest,platform%20in%20exchange%20for%20interest.) Other ways of making money off of crypto include Affiliate Programs and ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings). This realm extends deep into the chthonic corners of the internet–it’s advertised as a ‘passive’ way of making income without any prerequisites or qualifications. Furthermore, with the advent of Artificial Intelligence, people can now access exclusive AI-powered ‘blockchain’ software and encrypted services that could make them even more money (https://www.forbes.com/uk/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/top-10-artificial-intelligence-ai-cryptocurrencies/ ). A lot of these include exchange services for video streaming, media production, and even healthcare. From what I read, most users believe blockchain AI is a reputable way of exchanging data; one that ‘subverts’ the intrusive eyes of federal inspection (https://www.ibm.com/topics/blockchain-ai). After all, blockchains are designed to build ‘trust’ between investors and consumers–they thrive on a general atmosphere of tension between people. Crypto targets and destabilizes monopolies on traditional money. By decentralizing itself and offering diverse methods of investment, it self-identifies as a fully independent system meant for those skeptical of regular institutions (https://www.forbes.com/advisor/in/investing/cryptocurrency/advantages-of-cryptocurrency/ #:~:text=Cryptocurrencies%20are%20a%20portrayal%20of,makes%20cryptocurrencies%20secure%20and%20safe). Therefore, proponents of crypto label it not only as an alternative to tectonic monetary settlements but also as an investment in the future.
However, crypto comes with its disadvantages. For one, due to privacy and lack of insurance, it’s fully anonymous. It also lacks a lot of terms, so people aren’t guaranteed a full return on their investments. At the moment, the United States provides little federal framework for digital assets. Of 50 states, 7 have no regulations on crypto exchange (https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/). Many of the remaining 43 require money transmitter licenses, which regulate where and how they can invest in virtual currency (https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/technology/cryptocurrency-laws-and-regulations-by-state/ -r). In North Carolina, on top of having a money transmitter license you’ll need additional verification by the Commissioner of Banks and increased surety bond. Some states like Virginia and Utah outright exclude crypto in their respective money transmission definitions. In 2022, a sort of ‘bipartisanship’ arose in Congress on the matter of recognizing crypto as legal tender. Those who firmly defend its existence use arguments like a free exchange and self-regulation (i.e. Senator Cruz) (https://www.coindesk.com/consensus-magazine/2023/01/25/crypto-policy-regulation-us-congress/). On the other hand, its opponents compare it to “digital terrorism” or even call it a “national security threat” (i.e. Senators Warren and Sanders). Of course, those who impress on the bipartisanship are crypto’s proponents. Withal matters like freedom of speech and openness toward technology come into conflict when discussing such matters.
Outside the United States, several countries have banned crypto, including China, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/041515/countries-where-bitcoin-legal-illegal.asp). They quote concerns over destabilization and volatility, as well as energy use. Recently, a Bitcoin advocacy group pushed for a bill that could potentially expand crypto’s mining rights and electricity consumption (https://earthjustice.org/feature/cryptomining-bitcoin-state-bills-legislation). Environmentalists are pushing back, worried that this could “strain the grid” even further than it already is. Once again, they state that crypto is too superficial a system to deliver actual economic benefits; therefore further corrupting the environment for its sake yields little benefit. This extends the United States’ position on crypto to an international level (https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris-agreement). I encourage everyone partaking in this debate to consider our resolution from a contextual angle; what role does crypto play in your ideal future? Can we make a place for it in society, or is it on-net harmful?
Thank you all for looking at these materials! I hope to see many familiar faces at tomorrow’s meeting. 🙂
Ad virtutem, libertatem, scientiamque.
Critic Alaoui

A cryptocurrency is a type of virtual or digital currency. They are secured by cryptographic systems and can be used to make safe online transactions without any mediators. The word “crypto” refers to cryptographic techniques and several encryption algorithms that help secure these records, such

Good evening! I hope you all had a wonderful Spring Break. Tonight we will be considering “Resolved: Homeschooling shoul...
03/18/2024

Good evening! I hope you all had a wonderful Spring Break. Tonight we will be considering “Resolved: Homeschooling should be illegal.” While the intentionality of this resolution might come off as laughable, I think there’s a lot to learn from such a topic. The history of homeschooling is tricky; you can technically point back to ancient forms of school and say that most people [who could afford education] hired tutors to their homes. Of course, this has long been applied only to men of higher ranks in sedentary societies. Later on, small schools opened that often accommodated children of all ages and classes under one tutor. At this time–around the mid-1800s–we note a drastic shift from homestyle schooling to “formal education.” (https://daily.jstor.org/how-homeschooling-evolved-from-subversive-to-mainstream/)
With this came a demarcation of what distinguished tutorship at home compared to that by schools. In the United States, compulsory and formal education represented status, as students who went to school typically did not work. Furthermore, by the 1860s very few families found the resources required to educate their children at home profitable, especially as standardized examination and holistic learning became the norm. The 1970s witnessed a period of contention toward homeschoolers; simultaneously, social unrest and ideological fringe sparked by the Red Scare convinced many American parents that an at-home education was the safest choice for young minds (Gilbert). In 1972, the Supreme Court heard Wisconsin v. Yoder, in which two members of the Amish Order were persecuted by the state of Wisconsin for withholding their children from public school, which all students were required to attend till 16 years of age (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/406/205/ -opinion-1949691). The Court decided in favor of the parents, sparking a debate about religious beliefs and American education that led to a slow normalization of homeschooling once more.
In 2019, the National Center for Education Statistics reported that around 1.5 million children were being homeschooled in the United States (https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/interactive/2023/homeschooling-growth-data-by-district/). After the COVID pandemic, this number increased to between 1.9 and 2.7 million. The Washington Post reports that homeschooling rates for K-12 students increased by 103% in New York State and 108% in Washington, D.C.. Similar drastic changes occurred in Tennessee (77%), South Dakota (94%) and California (78%). Many parents found it easy to convert their pupils to school from home, especially with the rise in online learning platforms and a general concern over hygiene and safety in public settings. In an analysis of enrollment at 70,000 public schools across 33 states between 2019 and 2020, we see that the number of children enrolled in kindergartens fell by -9.3% (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/07/us/covid-kindergarten-enrollment.html). A significant portion of this statistic is from low-income neighborhoods, where 13.9% of children were disenrolled from local schools. Such a profile helps us understand the reasonings behind modern homeschooling. With that, however, comes once more controversy about what a proper education entails. For homeschoolers–usually parents–retaining one’s kids at home means additional work, emotional strain, and even burnout. Sociologist Jennifer Lois explores the emotional stages mothers experience whilst incorporating a teacher role into their lives (https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.2006.29.4.507?mag=how-homeschooling-evolved-from-subversive-to-mainstream&seq=9). Lois describes these mothers’ attempts to mitigate seriousness fit for a classroom and a lack of motivation from their children to learn anything; also known as ‘interpersonal emotional management.’ Otherwise, the glamorous appeal of homeschooling that had made them retain their children at home–individualized learning, stronger family bonding and often cultural practices–developed a friction with an ever-growing burden for parents to constantly plan lessons, build a functional classroom and even learn alongside their young pupils (Lois). The affirmation can definitely build on these points, arguing that homeschooling is an inherently oppressive structure that places more burden on homemakers than relieving them.
On the other hand, recent studies conducted by researchers Cynthia Drenovsky and Isaiah Cohen highlight the impact of homeschooling on social and academic progress for college students (https://www.jstor.org/stable/41887517?mag=how-homeschooling-evolved-from-subversive-to-mainstream). They found that in contrast to traditionally schooled students, homeschooled kids had lower rates of depression and higher rates of academic success. On average, they also performed better on tests of autonomy and competence, yet had similar scores to their traditionally schooled peers on relatedness with others (https://www.jstor.org/stable/intesociscierevi.90.2.02?mag=how-homeschooling-evolved-from-subversive-to-mainstream&seq=1). Drenovsky and Cohen find that homeschooled students were more appreciative of college and had high levels of community involvement. Perhaps the negation can lean into such statistics, illuminating not only these success rates but also a matter of choice (https://www.newenglrev.com/forum-56/9-2022-desperate-measures-for-desperate-times-can-physicians-refuse-to-treat-unvaccinated-patients-bny73). If one education mode were banned, what might this mean for other non-traditional ones? Can the government rightfully withhold any system they deem antithetical to societal conformity? I hope that all speakers tonight consider both moralistic and political implications underlying our resolution. Like always, the word “should” holds an intangible weight on the ethical scale.
Ad virtutem, libertatem, scientiamque.
Critic Alaoui

The pandemic helped establish homeschooling as a fixture among educational options in the US. But it’s been around—and gaining in popularity—for a while.

Please join us this April 13th! All proceeds will benefit the James Walker Jr Portrait Fund. To RSVP or to donate, visit...
03/18/2024

Please join us this April 13th! All proceeds will benefit the James Walker Jr Portrait Fund.

To RSVP or to donate, visit https://go.unc.edu/walker

Good evening, all. Tomorrow we will be debating “Resolved: We should continue to strive for gesamtkunstwerk.” That’s a b...
03/04/2024

Good evening, all. Tomorrow we will be debating “Resolved: We should continue to strive for gesamtkunstwerk.” That’s a big word right there! It is also from the German language. In layman's terms, gesamtkunstwerk refers to “total work of art” or a totalizing oneness of a piece (https://www.theartstory.org/definition/gesamtkunstwerk/ #:~:text=The%20German%20term%20Gesamtkunstwerk%2C%20roughly,create%20a%20single%20cohesive%20whole). People tend to connotate it with maximalism, drama, climactic displays or even mere emotion. But in truth, gesamtkunstwerk is more than that: it is an encompassment of everything that leads up to a piece’s final presentation. We can easily trace this phenomenon through architecture. Have you ever read some horrific tale about the human cost of a great wonder? The Pyramids of Giza, for one, were constructed by slaves, many of whom died in the process whilst toiling under critical conditions (https://historycollection.com/this-is-what-life-was-like-for-an-egyptian-worker-building-the-pyramids/22/). Therefore, the totalization of the pyramids includes these tributary deaths as well as the sardonic fact that they were built to be tombs for Pharaohs. I also think of the Empire State Building or the Bauhaus Arts Center (https://www.thecollector.com/what-is-a-gesamtkunstwerk-examples/). Such buildings represent the eras in which they were built, as well as the cultural significance of their make. They then propagate a larger historical progress toward greatness, i.e. humanity’s innovation. Yet gesamtkunstwerk can also appear through musical pieces, paintings, and other artistic mediums. Some popular examples that come to mind are Richard Wagner’s “Ride of the Valkyries” and the use of ‘chiaroscuro’ in artwork. The latter appears in dramatic paintings by Caravaggio and his disciple, Artemisia. They both aim to totalize vulgar yet oddly catholic scenes in their work through attention to light, anatomy, color theory, composition, and even the painters’ livelihoods (https://www.singulart.com/en/blog/2019/11/26/the-chaotic-life-of-caravaggio-chiaroscuro-and-the-cardsharps/). “Valkyries” pays homage to every element that contributed to its final composition: musical notation, instrumentals, directions, and the very idea of this work (https://fsumul2110.wordpress.com/2015/04/08/piece-review-the-ride-of-the-valkyries/). In fact, gesamtkunstwerk originates from Wagner, a 19th-century German composer who challenged his contemporaries to “exteriorize” their “hidden dream states” through emotional expression (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Claude-Debussy ). Wagner particularly demanded this of librettists and dramatists, for their job was to totalize human expression through music, stage design, and bodily movement. You can think of it almost as an extraction of the shadow ego behind artwork; a self-expository experiment. Carl Jung spends some time reflecting on how an artist can utilize signifiers to make an artwork their own (https://www.attentiveequations.com/jung-and-the-role-of-the-artist/). He also thinks that a collaboration between the creator and their society must exist for it to be transformed and renewed cyclically. Here the negation might question whether gesamtkunstwerk in such a way perpetuates a toxic newness that is detrimental to a society rather than innovative. If we need to make expositions out of our shadowy sides, is this necessarily healthy? Also, are grandeur and majesty ideals we should aim for, even if they might encourage human vices such as consumerism, addiction, or competition? Wagner believes gesamtkunstwerk holds the key to national development (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpQg1Yw1lSs). In the post-Romantic period, intellectuals proposed different ‘-isms’ that could bring out great ideals. This includes nationalism, socialism, conservatism, and even liberalism. Nationalism stood out as being transmittable to people of lower classes–it required strict ardor for a nation-state. Through totality, audiences [Germans, in particular] could gather notions of harmony and strong borders. In post-Bismarckian Central Europe, it unified passive cannon and a utopian future through a nationalist present (https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/blhs-109-fall2015/2015/10/16/week-8-richard-wagner-and-the-music-of-nationalism/). What I enjoy about this topic is that, ironically, it gathers different subjects under a single critique of art. That is, gesamtkunstwerk aims to address the purpose of ideology in the creation of a modern nation-state, as well as psychological notions of fraternity or political self-concept. Furthermore, gesamtkunstwerk requires an examination of the ethicality of majesty–can we achieve such totalization without sacrificing other persons’ livelihoods or identities in its wake? For one, the N**i party is a product of Wagner’s original musings. Coupled with critiques from contemporaries like Nietzsche, the negation might say that gesamtkunstwerk is only for the “short-sighted” who believe in infinite horizons like materialism and universality (https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/25012/pg25012-images.html). In such a way, perhaps it perpetuates false grandeur that limits critical inquiry or regresses us further into antiquarian thought. Still, the affirmation can impress that gesamtkunstwerk is a mental exercise of attentiveness and discipline. They can attack their opposition by stating that total artwork is the salvation of modernity from its supposed descent into disillusionment and apathy ["The Case Of Wagner"]. Withal, both sides have a plethora of examples to source arguments from! I hope that our speakers tomorrow can touch on all of these ideas whilst still paying the highest homage to art. Quite infrequently do debaters sit down and dissect humanity’s greatest contributions to aesthetics…Alas, let this debate be the antidote. I hope to see many familiar faces and wish all a merry March.
Ad virtutem, libertatem, scientiamque.
Critic Alaoui

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio led a turbulent life, consisting of murder charges, ambushes by knights, and a death that is shrouded in mystery to this day. He poured his passion into his artwork, producing realistic high renaissance pieces that had an incredible amount of detail. His use of ligh...

Welcome back, everyone! Tomorrow we will be holding our annual Bicentennial debate, an event which allows for the collab...
02/25/2024

Welcome back, everyone! Tomorrow we will be holding our annual Bicentennial debate, an event which allows for the collaboration between DiPhi's historical and productive strands. The Joint Senate selected the resolution “Did Bonaparte do more good or evil to mankind?” This was debated 200 years ago, when Bonaparte’s conquests were of pertinence. Today, his legacy mars much of the world’s governmental and ideological foundations. Bonaparte represented the quintessential Individual–a man who did not require legacy or institutional deliverance to rise high above his peers and make himself one with the State. Some might say that he equated American ideals of individualism, national pride, and ambition. As such, he reserves opposing opinions by those who regard him as either a hero of the Terror or a devil in the flesh. For this debate, the Philanthropic Society will speak in the affirmation, while the Dialectic Society will negate. Our talented Historian Osungbesan has provided us with some supplementary materials to better seat everyone with the historicity of this resolution.
The Fondation Napoléon produces yearly research on Bonaparte with the purpose of sharing information on him as well as maintaining French cultural heritage. Their digital library is organized into the phases of Napoleon I’s life, from his personal biography to his political legacy: https://bibliotheque-martial-lapeyre.napoleon.org/Default/bibliotheque-numerique-digital-library.aspx
Consider reviewing their document on the creation of the Code Civil, or a compilation of policies that sought to reform French society after the Revolution: https://www.napoleon.org/en/history-of-the-two-empires/articles/the-french-civil-code-or-code-civil-21-march-1804-an-overview/
What can we learn from the Napoleonic Code about socio-political fabric of nineteenth-century Europe, or even the underlying goals behind popular ideologies of the period? Also take note of his campaigns across Europe, which were mostly successful up until the infamous downfall at Waterloo: https://www.napoleon.org/en/history-of-the-two-empires/articles/napoleon-the-dark-side-the-human-cost-of-the-napoleonic-wars-3-min-read/
For the negation, it would be helpful to look at Bonaporte’s reinstitution of slavery, which he believed would strengthen France’s economic activities overseas. Indubitably, this would harm many of the Empire’s colonial subjects.
Of course, I have to include some multivariable media. One of my favorite movies, creatively titled ‘Napoleon’–is a five-hour-long film depicting his life. You can find it on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/napoleon.-1927.1080p.-blu-ray.x-265-rarbg
Did you know that Wilson Library hosts a copy of Bonaparte’s death mask? Go check it out before the Library closes this summer! I believe this tells a lot about the man’s relevance in American thought, if we keep relics of him in our academic institutions.
As we reflect on his legacy, consider reviewing this article by The New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/11/24/napoleon-bonaparte-the-good-soldier. It prescribes an interesting conversation on the division of power and self-interest.
Whether you’re a history buff or a curious visitor, everyone stands to benefit in some way from this debate. As a former Spring historian, the Bicentennial represents an opportunity for these Societies to congregate under the joint effort of progressing our legacy. I hope to see y’all tomorrow!
Ad virtues, libertatem, scientiamque.
Best,
Critic Alaoui

Abel Gance's epic five and a half hour long silent film from 1927 Napoleon. This film revolutionized cinema as we know it today.

Address

Chapel Hill, NC

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies:

Share