08/02/2025
“Mechanical valves over bioprosthesis for AVR
?! “
While this might be the reaction of a Cardiac surgeon or an Interventional cardiologist given the current norms in clinical practice, the following study from Bowdish and collegues using real-world 12-year data from STS database comparing bioprosthetic vs mechanical SAVR in >100,000 patients aged 40-75 years may seriously make you consider this question:
- After risk adjustment, mechanical SAVR was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients less than or equal to 60 years of age.
- These findings persisted with sensitivity analyses
after excluding the potential influence of pure aortic insufficiency, intermediate/ high surgical risk, and discontinued prosthetesis.
Interestingly, this study also reported a 10% decrease in utilization of mechanical valves over the 12-year study period pre-dominantly owing to the anticoagulation liability with these devices.
One might ask:
“But won’t anticoagulants affect the active lifestyle of a young patient?”🧐
The counter evidence to this fear of anticoagulant use in young patients in current clinical practice has been quoted by Dearani and collegues in their editorial as follows:
“With the current lower INR range (2-2.5) for aortic prostheses and advancements in home monitoring, the complications associated with anticoagulation are much less than generally perceived. Studies have shown that the risk of severe complications, such as fatal intracranial hemorrhage, can be reduced to levels comparable to those seen in the general population.”
“Patients who receive the On-X mechanical aortic valve have the option of using a lower INR target of 1.5 to 2.0 with the addition of aspirin, provided at least 3 months have passed since surgery”
Although given the retrospective nature of the study and lack of comparisons with TAVR bioprosthesis, these findings might not be enough to affect our clinical practice right away, they are enough to reconsider how we perceive mechanical valves usage in younger patients.
Find out more in the full texts of these articles:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109725001585?via%3Dihub
https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(25)00175-4/abstract
The study by Bowdish and colleagues1 confirms what has been known but largely ignored by our specialty about prosthetic valve choice for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and the findings are a wake-up call for clinicians, patients, and industry partners. For more than 2 decades, studies from large in...