11/21/2025
Dry Needling Vs Acupuncture
Is Dry Needling Acupuncture at All?
A Scientific Re-Examination of Two Techniques Often Confused — But Rarely Compared
Dry needling and acupuncture are frequently mentioned in the same breath, largely because both rely on the same instrument: a fine, solid filiform needle. Yet a closer look reveals that this is where their similarities end. The two therapies differ in their targeting strategies, mechanical intent, electrophysiological effects, and neuroimmune consequences.
This article revisits the question with contemporary anatomical, physiological, and pain-science evidence. We propose that dry needling should not be classified as a subtype of acupuncture, but rather as a distinct myofascial neuromodulatory intervention with its own mechanisms, clinical logic, and therapeutic domain.
A Simple Needle, Two Very Different Ideas
It is easy to assume that acupuncture and dry needling are cousins. Both involve needles. Both pe*****te the skin. Both appear, to an untrained eye, as variations of the same practice.
But clinically and physiologically, they emerge from two different lineages.
Acupuncture arose from a conceptual system built on channels, meridians, and diagnostic patterning. Over time, biomedical reinterpretations have added layers involving neurovascular bundles, dermatomes, and connective-tissue planes.
Dry needling, in contrast, developed from the study of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) — hyperirritable, dysfunctional motor endplate zones associated with spontaneous electrical activity (SEA), taut bands, contracture knots, and localized ischemia.
The question “Is dry needling acupuncture?” therefore cannot be answered culturally.
It must be answered physiologically.
What Exactly Do They Target?
Acupuncture
Acupuncture points are traditionally mapped along meridians. Modern research suggests many points overlap with:
• myofascial planes,
• neurovascular bundles,
• lymphatic intersections,
• dermatomal segmentations.
The targeting is systemic, even when the needle is placed locally.
Dry Needling
Dry needling is unapologetically local. It aims for:
• a palpable taut band,
• a hypercontractured sarcomeric region,
• a site of abnormal endplate activity,
• a zone capable of reproducing the patient’s referred pain.
The target is a pathological structure, not a symbolic point.
This distinction is the first major divergence.
Mechanotransduction: How the Tissue Responds
The insertion of a filament is not merely puncture; it is mechanical signaling.
But the type of mechanical signaling differs profoundly.
Acupuncture
Helene Langevin’s work demonstrated that acupuncture induces:
• fascial winding,
• fibroblast stretching and remodeling,
• piezoelectric signaling,
• slower, longer-range mechanical propagation.
The mechanical effect is distributed.
Dry Needling
Dry needling behaves much more like microsurgical disruption:
• mechanical breaking of contraction knots,
• ionic shifts at the motor endplate,
• release of contracted sarcomeres,
• normalization of acetylcholine spillover.
The effect is precise, local, and corrective, not systemic.
Mechanically, the two techniques are not just different — they are opposite.
Electrophysiology: The Clearest Scientific Boundary
If there is one domain where dry needling stands apart, it is electrophysiology.
Acupuncture
Acupuncture’s hallmark effects include:
• A-delta and C-fiber modulation,
• activation of descending inhibitory pathways,
• diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC),
• cortical and limbic modulation.
These effects are neurosensory, neurohormonal, and centrally integrated.
Dry Needling
Dry needling produces a very different signature:
• abolition of spontaneous electrical activity (SEA) at MTrPs,
• evoked local twitch response (LTR),
• resetting of abnormal endplate noise,
• restoration of normal sarcomere length.
This is endplate electrophysiology, not sensory neuromodulation.
No acupuncture study has ever demonstrated the extinction of SEA because acupuncture does not target dysfunctional endplates.
Electrophysiologically, dry needling and acupuncture are as different as nerve conduction testing is from transcutaneous nerve stimulation.
Neuroimmune Effects: Different Chemical Languages
Needles stimulate the immune system — but again, the details matter.
Acupuncture induces:
• vagal anti-inflammatory pathway activation,
• mast cell degranulation near perivascular sheaths,
• endorphin and serotonin release,
• hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis modulation.
Dry needling induces:
• IL-10 elevation in the local microenvironment,
• reduction in IL-6 and TNF-α,
• activation of satellite cells (myogenic repair),
• targeted reduction of nociceptive C-fiber sensitization,
• improved perfusion and oxygenation of the taut band.
One is neurohormonal and systemic.
The other is micro-injury–driven and regenerative.
The immune system responds differently because the tissue insult — and the tissue target — differ.
Clinical Logic: Why We Do What We Do
Acupuncture is selected through pattern diagnosis, seeking to balance systemic dysregulation.
Dry needling is selected through palpatory and neurophysiological identification of a dysfunctional structure that perpetuates nociceptive input.
If acupuncture attempts to adjust the orchestra, dry needling repairs a single misfiring instrument.
The intent shapes the method. The method shapes the physiology.
Why the Confusion? The Thin Needle Problem
The only visible commonality is the tool.
But the tool does not define the therapy.
If that were true:
• A lumbar puncture would be “acupuncture of cerebrospinal fluid.”
• A joint aspiration would be “acupuncture of synovium.”
• A percutaneous tenotomy would be “acupuncture of tendons.”
Clearly, this is absurd.
A technique is defined not by its instrument, but by where it goes, what it targets, and what it aims to change.
Two Techniques, Two Sciences
The accumulated modern evidence leads to a simple, scientifically defensible conclusion:
Dry needling is not acupuncture.
It is a distinct, physiologically grounded intervention aimed at restoring normal function in dysfunctional motor endplates, using predictable mechanical and electrophysiological mechanisms.
Acupuncture occupies a different therapeutic territory — one rooted in systemic neuromodulation, visceral reflex arcs, fascial signaling, and autonomic regulation.
Both have value.
Both deserve clarity.
Neither should be defined by the presence of a needle alone.
Dry needling is best described as:
a myofascial neuromodulatory microsurgical procedure targeting pathological endplates through mechanical and electrophysiological resetting.
This distinction is not semantic — it is biological, clinical, and essential for scientific integrity.
References
1. Hong, C-Z. “Electrophysiological characteristics of myofascial trigger points.” Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain (1994).
2. Shah, J.P. et al. “Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated near active myofascial trigger points.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2008).
3. Simons, D., Travell, J., Simons, L. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Wolters Kluwer.
4. Langevin, H.M. et al. “Biomechanical response to acupuncture needling in humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology (2001).
5. Kietrys, D.M. et al. “Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain.” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (2013).
6. Dommerholt, J. & Fernández-De-Las-Peñas, C. “Trigger point dry needling.” Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (2013).
7. Zhang, R. et al. “Neural mechanisms of acupuncture.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2014).
8. Butts, R. & Dunning, J. “Peripheral and central nervous system effects of dry needling.” JMMT (2016).
9. Gerwin, R.D. “A review of myofascial pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.” Acupuncture in Medicine (2005).
10. Chou, L., et al. “Dry needling modulates segmental spinal excitability.” Pain Physician (2015).
