Handtevy - Pediatric Emergency Standards, Inc.

Handtevy - Pediatric Emergency Standards, Inc. Pediatric Emergency Standardโ€™s mission is to improve the quality of pediatric emergency medical care for all sick and injured children.

Pediatric HALO calls demand clarity, confidence, and preparation. ๐Ÿšจ Handtevy, FlightBridgeED, and ZOLL come together for...
12/15/2025

Pediatric HALO calls demand clarity, confidence, and preparation. ๐Ÿšจ

Handtevy, FlightBridgeED, and ZOLL come together for a clinical webinar on ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐Ÿญ๐—ฃ๐—  ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง to address the cognitive and emotional demands, explore real-world cases, and practice simulation-driven strategies to build confidence when it matters most.

Ready to register? Save your seat TODAY! ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://ow.ly/96ih50XK0YU

Wishing the happiest birthday to our founder and CMO, Dr. Peter Antevy! ๐ŸŽ‰  Your passion for saving lives and elevating e...
12/11/2025

Wishing the happiest birthday to our founder and CMO, Dr. Peter Antevy! ๐ŸŽ‰

Your passion for saving lives and elevating emergency care is the heartbeat of Handtevy. Thank you for inspiring our team and leading with purpose. We hope your day is as special as the impact you make. ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’š

The ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐˜† ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ returns LIVE on ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐Ÿฏ๐—ฃ๐—  ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง  ๐Ÿซ๐Ÿ“ˆ Dr. Peter Antevy and Captain Will Caruso will ...
12/10/2025

The ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐˜† ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ returns LIVE on ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐Ÿฏ๐—ฃ๐—  ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿซ๐Ÿ“ˆ Dr. Peter Antevy and Captain Will Caruso will take you inside COโ‚‚ physiology and waveform capnography, giving you a practical framework for reading, interpreting, and acting on critical respiratory signalsโ€”and so much more!

Captain Will Carusoโ€™s 25 years in EMS, combined with his hospital and educator background, make this session a must for any clinician aiming to elevate readiness.
๐Ÿ‘‰ Click here to register now: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/iHwyLTNGQpafzTrqKpw0BA #/registration

Should your trauma center be using whole blood in pediatric trauma patients?A new multicenter study across 10 Level I tr...
12/09/2025

Should your trauma center be using whole blood in pediatric trauma patients?

A new multicenter study across 10 Level I trauma centers looked at this question. Can you guess what they found?

๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿฅ Whole blood (WB) resuscitation is safe in pediatric trauma โ€” and possibly more efficient than traditional component therapy.

Ok, we didn't need the drum roll there, mainly because it's obvious. But let's look at the paper nonetheless.

๐Ÿ“Š Study Breakdown:
90 pediatric trauma patients (ages 0โ€“17) were included
โ€ข 62 received at least 1 unit of WB
โ€ข 28 received traditional blood component therapy (BCT)
Mechanism of injury:
โ€ข 64% penetrating (91% of those were GSWs)
โ€ข 36% blunt (53% of those were MVCs)

Outcomes ๐Ÿฉธ :
1๏ธโƒฃ No difference in mortality between WB and BCT groups (35.5% vs 35.7%; P = 0.98)
2๏ธโƒฃ No significant difference in complications (AKI, DVT, PE, ARDS, TRALI, or TACO)
3๏ธโƒฃ No transfusion reactions were reported in either group
4๏ธโƒฃ WB patients tended to require fewer units of PRBCs, FFP, and platelets after 4 hours (trend, not statistically significant)

Here's a Notable Observation โš ๏ธ :
Black pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive WB than White patients
๐Ÿ‘‰ 57.5% vs 83.3%

โœ… So for the (obvious to us, but not to some) Conclusions:
1. Whole blood resuscitation is safe for critically injured pediatric trauma patients and may reduce the volume of blood products needed.
2. Simpler to administer, and there's no need for separate PRBCs, plasma, and platelets.

๐Ÿ“š Read the Full Study:
https://www.handtevy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/perea-et-al-2023-whole-blood-resuscitation-is-safe-in-pediatric-trauma-patients-a-multicenter-study.pdf

It's ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ time! ๐ŸŽ‰  This month, weโ€™re shining the light on Carissa Moll, our Senior Manager of Clinical ...
12/08/2025

It's ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ time! ๐ŸŽ‰ This month, weโ€™re shining the light on Carissa Moll, our Senior Manager of Clinical Administration, whose steady leadership and clinical excellence help drive Handtevy forward every day.

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ข๐˜‚๐˜ ๐ŸŒŸ
Carissa is known for kindness, fueled by helpfulness, and so steady youโ€™d think they were written into the buildingโ€™s blueprints. She has always been a steady asset to Handtevy and is a great mentor!

๐—™๐˜‚๐—ป ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜!
Carissa is an amazing baker and has made some delicious treats for us! ๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿณ๐Ÿช

If you don't believe in mechanical CPR, please stop reading here. ๐Ÿ™‚Ok, a little dig.In all seriousness, we found an inte...
12/03/2025

If you don't believe in mechanical CPR, please stop reading here. ๐Ÿ™‚

Ok, a little dig.

In all seriousness, we found an interesting article to review today.

The question these researchers asked -- Is it safe to target a specific spot on the sternum, instead of just the "lower half?"

Their hypothesis was that compressing just a bit lower on the sternum could make a difference, yet they needed to prove that it wasn't more harmful first.

They performed a cadaveric randomized controlled trial and looked at shifting the chest compression landmark from the traditional โ€œlower half of the sternumโ€ (as recommended by ILCOR) to a spot 12.6 cm below the sternal notch, aligning with the maximal diameter of the left ventricle โค๏ธ.

Hereโ€™s what they did ๐Ÿ‘‡
42 cadavers were randomized into 2 groups:
1. Standard landmark: lower half of the sternum
2. Alternative landmark: 12.6 cm below sternal notch (targeting LV)

Then, mechanical CPR (LUCAS device) was delivered for 30 minutes.

Injuries were assessed via CT and autopsy.

What did they find?

Serious injuries were not significantly different between groups:
โ—† Standard: 66.7% vs. Alternative: 61.9% (p = 0.747)

Rib cage injuries:
โ—† 61.9% (standard) vs. 52.4% (alternative) (p = 0.533)

Flail chest:
โ—† 14.3% (standard) vs. 4.8% (alternative) (p = 0.293)

Heart injuries:
โ—† 0% (standard) vs. 9.5% (alternative) (p = 0.147)

Visceral injuries (lung, liver, spleen):
โ—† 19 % (standard) vs. 33.3% (alternative) (p = 0.292)

It's interesting that 100% the cadavers had rib fractures regardless of group.

So what's the key Insight:
Targeting the lower end of the sternum, where the left ventricle is largest, did not increase serious injury rates. That makes it a promising spot for compressions....but...

This was a cadaveric study and only done to evaluate safety.

Still, it's a strong first step toward rethinking where we push during CPR.

Now, if I could only figure out how to measure 12.6 cm ๐Ÿ˜

๐Ÿ“š Read the full study here:https://www.handtevy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Safety-Evaluation-of-an-Alternative-Chest-Compression-Landmark-for-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation-A-Cadaveric-Randomized-Controlled-Trial.pdf

Are we underutilizing paramedics in meeting community health needs?A new position statement from The National Associatio...
12/02/2025

Are we underutilizing paramedics in meeting community health needs?

A new position statement from The National Association of EMS Physicians - Naemsp outlines the evolving roles of EMS in Mobile Integrated Healthcare (MIH) and Community Paramedicine (CP), and calls for action across medical direction, training, funding, and data collection.

๐Ÿ“Œ Key Takeaways from the NAEMSP Statement:
โžก๏ธ EMS medical directors (preferably board-certified) should guide CP/MIH programs, ensuring clinical quality and oversight.
โžก๏ธ Programs must be built on a community health needs assessment and tailored to fill gaps.
โžก๏ธ EMS clinicians need targeted training along with regular competency evaluations.
โžก๏ธ Funding should be decoupled from transport; sustainable reimbursement models are essential.
โžก๏ธ Data standardization is critical: without common outcome metrics, comparing or scaling programs is nearly impossible.

๐Ÿ“Š What does the research show?
โ–ธ A 2025 rapid review found 161 relevant studies informing this statement, including examples of successful implementation, quality improvement strategies, and regulatory models.
โ–ธ The now-ended ET3 model showed early promise: 92% of interventions were treatment in place, with signs of reduced ED visits and cost savings, despite low national participation.

โœ… Bottom Line:
MIH and CP are not fringe ideas, they are essential expansions of EMS into public health. But without medical leadership, clear training paths, and reliable reimbursement, these programs canโ€™t scale. This document is a blueprint for moving forward.

๐Ÿ“š Read the full NAEMSP position statement here:
https://www.handtevy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Mobile-integrated-health-care-and-community-paramedicine-A-position-statement-and-resource-document-of-NAEMSP.pdf

Your patient is in cardiac arrest, and the odds of survival are not looking promising. The family is crying outside. Do ...
12/01/2025

Your patient is in cardiac arrest, and the odds of survival are not looking promising. The family is crying outside. Do you keep them there, or bring them in?

You know how I feel about this if you've been following me. For me there's no question that family should not be excluded.

Today we report on a recent article proposing a terminology reframe which may help the non-believers.

Instead of calling it โ€œTermination of Resuscitation (TOR),โ€ consider it Withdrawal of Life Support (WOLS). Perhaps this shift could change how we view (and manage) death in the field.

๐Ÿšจ Why it matters:
On-scene death happens in ~10 per 1,000 EMS responses, and they are usually sudden, traumatic, and emotionally devastating.

EMS clinicians face high rates of PTSD and moral distress, especially when they feel care is misaligned with patient & family values.

What we can learn from the ICU?

In hospitals, family presence during resuscitation is standard, and associated with:
โ–ถ Decreased PTSD, anxiety, and complicated grief
โ–ถ Increased family understanding and satisfaction
โ–ถ Greater clinician-family trust

Contrast this to EMS, where family presence is less common, often due to legal, emotional, and logistical barriers.

Here's how the authors describe the "Withdrawal of Life Support" approach in the field:
โ–ถ Inviting family to observe resuscitation (when safe and appropriate)
โ–ถ Allowing them to touch/speak to their loved one before compressions stop
โ–ถ Framing TOR as a deliberate withdrawal of life support, not an abrupt ending
โ–ถ Using brief rituals (e.g., moment of silence) to acknowledge death

There are also other tools to help:
โœ… GRIEV_ing and SPIKES: structured frameworks for death notification and emotional support
โœ… WITNESS mnemonic (page 5 diagram): helps guide EMS crews in offering family presence and managing scenes with dignity

Here's a pragmatic example to consider:
In one case, the EMS crew continued CPR just long enough for a mother to arrive and say goodbye. Once she touched her son and CPR was stopped, the family expressed immense gratitude. The crew found the experience more humane and meaningful than typical TORs.

Are there barriers? Here are the typical ones.
1๏ธโƒฃ Scene safety
2๏ธโƒฃ Legal/jurisdictional policies (e.g., medical examiner or law enforcement control)
3๏ธโƒฃ Emotional stability of the family

What's the overall takeaway?
Reframing "termination of resuscitation" as "withdrawal of life support" isn't just semantics, it's about making death less traumatic, humanizing the final moments, and providing emotional support for both families and EMS clinicians.

I'd highly recommend Emergency Resilience, a death notification course by the true expert on this topic, Alex Jabr. Use it at your agency and consider it for Officer Development. PA

๐Ÿ“š Read the full article here:https://www.handtevy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Reframing-Prehospital-Termination-of-Resuscitation-as-Withdrawal-of-Life-Support-Applying-Lessons-from-the-ICU-in-the-Prehospital-Setting.pdf

Photo courtesy of Dansun Photos

Time to share a few highlights from our Handtevy Thanksgiving Potluck filled with good food, laughs, and even better com...
11/27/2025

Time to share a few highlights from our Handtevy Thanksgiving Potluck filled with good food, laughs, and even better company! ๐Ÿงก Weโ€™re so thankful today and every day for the EMS professionals who serve our communities and for the trust you place in us every day.

The Handtevy Team wishes you all a safe and wonderful Thanksgiving! ๐Ÿฆƒ๐ŸŒŸ

๐Ÿ“ฃ Up Next in NAEMSP's Florida EMS Weekly Webinar Series:Dr. Peter Antevy teams up with Mike Humphrey and Adam Perrettโ€”th...
11/19/2025

๐Ÿ“ฃ Up Next in NAEMSP's Florida EMS Weekly Webinar Series:
Dr. Peter Antevy teams up with Mike Humphrey and Adam Perrettโ€”the LFES leaders behind Lethbridgeโ€™s nationally recognized Cardiac Arrest Survivability Programโ€”to walk through the ROSC Bundle of Care and the outcomes itโ€™s producing.

๐Ÿ—“ Friday, Nov 21 โ€ข 11โ€“11:30 AM EST
๐Ÿ”— Save your seat today! Click here to register now >> https://ow.ly/hWjJ50XuoLI

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿš’ You're 6 minutes into CPR after a building collapse.Your arms are burning, you're drenched in sweat, and you're not ...
11/17/2025

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿš’ You're 6 minutes into CPR after a building collapse.

Your arms are burning, you're drenched in sweat, and you're not done yet.

๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐จ๐ž๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐ฎ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐œ๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐‚๐๐‘ ๐ช๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ?

A recent article in Prehospital Emergency Care took a hard look at a study evaluating CPR performance during simulated disaster rescues and offered some sharp (and well-deserved) critiques

Hereโ€™s what you need to know โฌ‡๏ธ

The original study examined rescuers performing CPR during simulated post-earthquake conditions.

Rescuers did 5 uninterrupted CPR cycles (~2.5โ€“3 min) per person before switching.

CPR โ€œqualityโ€ was assessed based only on compression depth (green light on the simulator).

Key Concerns Raised by Imamoglu et al.:
โžŠ No chest compression fraction (CCF) reported, even though we know this is a strong predictor of survival. Guidelines recommend CCF >80%.
โž‹ Ventilation measurement was vague โ€” no detail on volume, pressure, or visual confirmation of chest rise.
โžŒ Rescuer switches every 2.5โ€“3 min, instead of the recommended 2 min
โž CPR quality was based solely on compression depth, but no data on recoil, rate, or no-flow time
โžŽ Gender distribution was inconsistent between methods and randomization, raising reproducibility concerns.

๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐„๐Œ๐’:
Fatigue during prolonged CPR, especially in disaster settings, can rapidly degrade performance.

Simply counting compressions isnโ€™t enough. Metrics like rate, recoil, ventilation quality, and CCF must be tracked.

Using feedback-enabled manikins can help simulate real-world stress and improve future training

Bottom Line:๏ฟฝHigh-stress, high-fatigue scenarios demand more than just effort. They demand data-driven, guideline-based performance.

Read the full paper: https://ow.ly/LVrf50XnN5I

hashtag hashtag hashtag hashtag hashtag hashtag hashtag

๐Ÿšจ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐ฌ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐š ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐œ๐š๐ซ๐๐ข๐š๐œ ๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ฌ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ, โ€œ๐ˆ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐š๐ฐ ๐ก๐ข๐ฆ ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž 3 ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ฎ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ ๐จ.โ€ Doe...
11/14/2025

๐Ÿšจ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐ฌ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐š ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐œ๐š๐ซ๐๐ข๐š๐œ ๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ฌ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ, โ€œ๐ˆ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐š๐ฐ ๐ก๐ข๐ฆ ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž 3 ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ฎ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ ๐จ.โ€

Does this change your plan?

๐˜๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ.

A new peer-reviewed study in Prehospital Emergency Care reveals that not all unwitnessed cardiac arrests are the same, and that using a bystanderโ€™s estimated last seen alive time (ELSA) can help identify patients with better chances of survival, similar to those who had witnessed arrests.

๐‡๐ž๐ซ๐žโ€™๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐:
Over 4,800 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were analyzed.

Among them, 2,067 were witnessed and 2,755 were unwitnessed.

For patients with an ELSA time under 5 minutes, the outcomes looked much better than expected, and almost the same as witnessed arrests.

๐…๐š๐ฏ๐จ๐ซ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ง๐ž๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐œ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž ๐š๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ž ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ:
โ—† 18.9% for witnessed arrests
โ—† 14.0% for ELSA

Address

11860 SR-84 Suite B1
Davie, FL
33325

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+18668673192

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Handtevy - Pediatric Emergency Standards, Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Handtevy - Pediatric Emergency Standards, Inc.:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram