03/17/2024
https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-decide-white-house-091101770.html
This is a landmark Supreme Court case.
The irony about this story about misinformation is the misinformation in this story itself.
RFK, Jr. never stated that Hank Aaron died as a direct result of the COVID-19 vaccine. You will not find a video interview of him stating this, because he never said it. If you don’t believe me, look for yourself!
The truth is that he stated that it was very coincidental that Aaron died within a few weeks of receiving the vaccine, and that a full investigation should occur to determine his cause of death. You can find that video!
Occam's razor suggests that the simplest explanation that is the most logical is usually the truth. Also, correlation can not conclude causation. My point here is that we need to investigate things ourselves to find the truth, but the most logical and simplest explanation is always the leading candidate when searching for the truth!
Aaron’s cause of death was determined by the coroner to be of “natural causes”. Was that a coverup? We don’t know, but Aaron stated that he was getting vaccinated on national television, to show the black community that the vaccine was safe.
How would have impacted the vaccination rate within the black community if it was announced by the coroner that Hank died as a direct result of that “safe” vaccine?
Another fact is that according to the US Government’s CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Reaction Reporting System (VAERS), more deaths and adverse events have occurred from the COVID-19 vaccines than all other vaccines collectively since the reporting began in the 1980s. You won’t see that in the mainstream news, but you can find it by researching the VAERS stats.
Another interesting point is that a new term has emerged in social media. That term is “malinformation” According to Wikipedia, “Malinformation is a controversial term for information which is based on fact but removed from its original context in order to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”
Malinformation is an inconvenient truth!
This case, in my opinion, is one of the most important cases involving the First Amendment.
In theory, we have a first amendment right to have access to the truth!
Will the Supreme Court make this theory a reality?
Social media cases before the Supreme Court may present a "once in a generation" chance to define how far governments can go to affect online content.
