Lilo Bauer-Freitag, M.A., CLC

05/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18YE1GBbj2/

Cancer in Younger Adults – The Question No One Is Addressing

Rising Cancer in Younger Adults Highlights a Critical Gap in Current Scientific Understanding

A major new study published in BMJ Oncology examines cancer trends in England and identifies patterns that are not fully explained by established risk factors.

Garcia-Closas M, Richards Z, Frost R, et al.
Temporal trends in behavioural risk factors for cancers with rising incidence in younger adults: an analysis of population-based data in England.
BMJ Oncology 2026;5:e000966
DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000966
👉 https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000966

The study analyses cancer incidence data in England between 2001 and 2019 and reports rising rates of several cancers in adults aged 20 to 49, including colorectal, breast, kidney, pancreatic, liver, endometrial, thyroid, oral, multiple myeloma, gallbladder, and ovarian cancers.

Researchers examined established behavioural risk factors including smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, physical inactivity, and obesity.

Their findings show that most of these factors have remained stable or declined in younger adults, with the exception of obesity, which has increased. However, even obesity does not fully account for the scale or pattern of the increases observed.

The authors conclude that known behavioural risk factors do not fully explain the rising incidence of cancer in younger adults and highlight the need to investigate additional contributing factors, including early-life exposures and other underexplored influences.

It is important to note that the study is limited to behavioural risk factors. It does not examine environmental and physical exposures that are widely recognised in cancer research, including air pollution, occupational exposures, chemical exposures, electromagnetic fields from power-frequency and wireless technologies.

As a result, the study cannot assess whether any of these factors may be contributing to the observed rise in cancers among younger adults.

This is a critical limitation. When established behavioural factors do not fully explain a population-level trend, the remaining uncertainty lies in the range of exposures that have not yet been systematically evaluated within the same framework.

The central question

♦ The key issue raised by the BMJ Oncology study is not whether cancer rates are changing.

♦ They are.

♦ The question is why current explanations do not fully account for these changes.

♦ Until all plausible contributing factors, including environmental exposures, are properly investigated, this gap in understanding remains unresolved.

♦ And the longer it remains unresolved, the greater the risk to public health.

👉 Read the full feature here
https://radiationresearch.org/cancer-is-rising-in-younger-adults-leading-research-shows-we-do-not-yet-know-why/

fans

05/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LD6c3ahXT/

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has issued a stark warning about the potential health risks associated with the growing number of massive data centers being built across the country. According to Kennedy, these facilities—designed to house vast amounts of digital information—could have serious consequences for both the environment and human health. He describes the risks as “grave injuries,” referring to the long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation, air pollution, and the increased strain on local resources that these centers bring.

As data centers multiply in response to the rising demand for cloud storage and internet services, communities near these facilities could be exposed to hazardous levels of radiation and chemicals. Kennedy’s concern stems from studies linking long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risks of cancer and neurological disorders. Moreover, the energy consumption of these centers is staggering, contributing to environmental degradation and further health concerns linked to pollution.

Kennedy is urging lawmakers to take these risks seriously and regulate the growth of data centers more carefully. The issue has sparked a broader debate on the balance between technological progress and public health. As the digital age continues to expand, questions surrounding the safety of our communities remain at the forefront of the conversation.

04/26/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1cqQ5iTtjh/

Experts are examining the potential effects of electromagnetic fields from technologies like 5G and WiFi on human biology, particularly how they might affect the blood-brain barrier. This barrier is crucial for controlling which substances can enter the brain from the bloodstream.

Research suggests that high radiation levels could alter the permeability of this barrier. However, current exposure from everyday WiFi and 5G signals is well below safety limits set by organizations like the FCC and WHO.

The general scientific consensus is that typical use of these technologies does not pose a risk to brain function or the blood-brain barrier. Ongoing studies continue to explore any potential long-term effects, especially as wireless networks become denser.

For those concerned, simple actions like limiting close-range device use and opting for wired connections can help. Experts assure the public that current usage remains safe within regulatory standards.

04/09/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1SQnMi2jqL/

04/08/2026

Very bad for our health!

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BAPN2i9NU/

30 March 2026 | ZEROGeoengineering.com | Ball of Pollution | Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW) is pollution that is continuously emitted by NEXRAD (Next Generation Radar) facilities. NEXRA…