03/21/2026
A common observation suggests that the stronger a person’s spiritual background, the greater the chance that the person will report intense religious experiences and undergo conversion (Clark, 1929; Coe, 1900). Frequency of church attendance, knowledge of one’s faith, importance of religious beliefs, and the persistence of religious ideas over many decades are correlates of early religious socialization (McGuire, 1992; Shand, 1990). In other words, the more conservatively religious or orthodox the home and family in which a person was reared, the greater the person’s likelihood of using religious attributions later in life.
Hood Jr. PhD, Ralph W.; Hill PhD, Peter C.; Spilka PhD, Bernard. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach (p. 26). (Function). Kindle Edition.
————
DT: This observational information is often used as a “gotcha” by many secular non-believers critical of religious ideology. Using it this way betrays the person’s tendency to ignore science in favor of their need to chastise the “other” side. Because there is no other here. If you ever think your likelihood of thinking a thing is somehow divorced from your upbringing and historical experiences, then the level of delusion is greater than that being ascribed to the believer. Your ideas are never separate from the social milieu in which you grew up, the ongoing experiences you’ve had since, and the current incentives provided by the groups you currently reside within. Rather than a gotcha moment, it should encourage a humble recognition that there but for the grace of socio-biology go I.