02/05/2026
SUBJECT: Regarding Your Request to Rehome Horses
It has come to my attention that it is common for my friends, colleagues, clients and community to be contacted, very, very regularly (sometimes 3-6 times per month) by other working equine professionals, with the request that "we" absorb horses from their programs due to those horses aging out, being unsound, or deemed unsuited for the training outcomes of someones program. This has become so common it is no longer surprising that "people like us" are seen as caring, empathic and safe homes for overspill of the industry.
Anyone reading who is often approached like this, and is looking for a way to reply to these applicants, the applicants are very seldom coming from friends or colleagues and are usually from totally unknown persons, and you would like a clear, not-mincing-of-words way to reply in a manner that outlines your ethical stance, holds others to a higher standard, and invites them to resolve an overflow problem in a collaborative manner, I attach below email copy for you to use. Feel free to soften the tone if you feel that's right for you. I have not softened the tone, because I believe it is the responsibility of all horse-work programs to factor in the lifelong care of the majority of horses they take in, and begin to stop treating these animals as disposable.
Dear (name of applicant)
SUBJECT: Regarding Your Request to Rehome Horses
Dear (name of applicant)
Thank you for reaching out. We need to be very clear and upfront: we are not able to take on or re-home horses from your program, particularly those being displaced due to age, illness, or perceived lack of talent or prospect for the training outcomes in your program. Our work is not that of a retirement facility or overflow solution for programs that can no longer accommodate the long-term outcomes of their training and business decisions. Asking private individuals or small operations to absorb this responsibility shifts the burden away from where it ethically belongs and does not reflect respect for the animal as a lifelong commitment.
That said, we do believe strongly that the responsibility for a horse’s full lifespan must be built into any professional training operation, and when this is no longer possible, it is important to examine why. As a constructive alternative, we are willing to offer consulting support to help you to identify the structural reasons your program is struggling to safely accommodate horses long term. This is not rescue work, but professional analysis intended to address root causes rather than symptoms. The outcome of this consulting arm of my work is to maximise the number of safe homes for an industry over populated with horses while under populated with responsible long term stewardship.
Specifically, we can offer:
(1) a program and inventory audit to assess horse intake, throughput, and exit strategies;
(2) a financial and cost-of-care analysis to evaluate whether pricing, volume, or resource allocation is creating unsustainable pressure on your program and business; and
(3) a training and outcome review to examine how expectations around performance, age, and soundness are influencing disposal decisions.
Engaging in this kind of assessment is, in our view, a basic sign of respect for the animals whose labor underpins the industry we love so much and work so hard to uphold. If you wish to pursue this route, you are welcome to let us know. This offer would be a 3-6 week assessment, depending on the outcomes of the assessment and include an actionable plan for you to implement if you so choose to.
Kind regards,
----