Intentional Living KC

01/10/2026

Whooo!! Credit card companies...🤔

BREAKING: President Trump announces he is capping credit card interest rates at 10% for one year, effective January 20th.

01/09/2026

He is such an anti-American leader. He wants to turn New York into Idonesia, and bring the "Quran" to the people of New York, scrap the "Bible", & abolish the "Constitution" If you don't abide by it...well YOUR out. However they choose to do it.
MAGA! MASA!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

The U.S. Department of Justice has warned New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration against engaging in racial discrimination, following concerns raised over recent housing-related appointments and rhetoric. The warning was issued January 7, 2026, by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon, as federal officials said they are closely monitoring actions by City Hall.

The caution came after Mamdani appointed housing activist Cea Weaver as the city’s new tenant advocate. Attention intensified after an older video resurfaced in which Weaver discussed shifting away from individual property rights toward a “collective good” model and said families, “especially white families,” would need to rethink their relationship to property.

Dhillon said the comments raised potential civil rights concerns and stressed that federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, regardless of the group affected. “We will NOT tolerate discrimination based on skin color. It is ILLEGAL,” Dhillon wrote on social media, adding that the Civil Rights Division is “paying very close attention.”

The Justice Department said the warning serves as formal notice that any city policies found to violate federal civil rights statutes could prompt federal intervention. Dhillon reiterated those points in a television interview, saying equal protection under the law applies to all Americans.

The development adds scrutiny to Mamdani’s broader housing agenda, which includes proposals affecting rent regulation and tenant protections. Similar federal civil rights warnings have been issued in past cases where local policies raised concerns about race-based impacts.

Supporters of the administration say the housing agenda focuses on affordability and tenant rights, while critics argue the rhetoric risks crossing legal boundaries, setting up a broader debate over civil rights enforcement and local housing policy.

01/09/2026

Ni****ne...
🤔😯

01/09/2026

Know the facts. News will NOT report them. We have to do our own research
MAGA!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

People may be paying attention to Portland, Oregon right now but I'm paying limited attention; instead following the Fiesta Bowl. I have no dog in the fight, but Melody Terwilliger, a person following this page, and you should check out her content -good stuff, does. Heck of a game.

This may be my last post on Minnesota attack on an ICE, that turned out badly for the attacker. I found this on Political Arena written by Donald Leslie (not linking) It provides a very good recap and clearly demonstrates the fault was clearly that of the driver.

Nothing but the truth
Here is what matters ..based on law, not emotion:
• She disobeyed lawful commands from federal law enforcement
• She obstructed an active ICE operation
• She remained in the driver’s seat of a vehicle, which courts consistently recognize as a potential deadly weapon
• She pressed the accelerator while officers were positioned in front of the vehicle
• She did not stop, surrender, or comply despite multiple opportunities
She had options.
She could have:
✔️ Stopped the vehicle
✔️ Turned off the engine
✔️ Put her hands up
✔️ Exited the vehicle
✔️ Complied with commands
She chose none of those.
Instead, she chose to:
❌ Obstruct
❌ Disobey
❌ Move the vehicle while officers were in immediate danger
⚖️ WHAT THE LAW SAYS
🔹 Vehicle as a Deadly Weapon
Federal courts have repeatedly held that a motor vehicle can constitute a deadly weapon when used against officers.
• United States v. Anchrum, 590 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2009)
• United States v. Sanchez, 914 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2019)
🔹 Use of Deadly Force Standard
Law enforcement is permitted to use deadly force when an officer has probable cause to believe a suspect poses an immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death.
• Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
🔹 Objective Reasonableness Standard
Use of force is judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, not with hindsight.
• Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
🔹 Obstruction & Assault of Federal Officers
• 18 U.S.C. § 111 — Assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers
• 18 U.S.C. § 1501 — Obstruction of federal process
🔹 Failure to Comply During Lawful Detention
Refusal to comply during a lawful federal enforcement action escalates legal exposure and justifies force escalation when safety is threatened.
• DOJ Use-of-Force Policy (Revised 2021–2024)

01/06/2026

Chia seeds...🤔

12/25/2025

12/21/2025

They plan to infiltrated the entire United States. Follow them,and obey, give them all your money or they will kill you.
They BELIEVE they are the only religion & race. God help us. MAGA! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

12/20/2025

Indicted today!! Things are moving now!
MAGA!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

12/10/2025

12/02/2025

Our Lives are built through, around & because of emotion...Until we become masters of recognizing, feeling & directing them they will DIRECT Us. 🤔
#
# .intentionallivingkc.com