03/12/2026
All of us want to do our best when it comes to supporting every single one of our clients. For those of us looking for better verbiage to conceptualize dialect features and a better understanding of the diverse language varieties on our caseloads, our research review of Dr. Janna Oetting’s proposed terms is a great place to start.
Check out our review “A better way to talk about grammar(s)” at https://www.theinformedslp.com/review/A-better-way-to-talk-about-grammars to learn (lots) more and earn 11 DEI CE minutes. Then head to the comments to share your thoughts and your preferred inclusive and accurate grammar terms!
The research: https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_ajslp-25-00202
[Visual description: "It’s time to update how we talk about English grammar(s). Inclusive and precise terms matter. Let’s learn together. For example, when describing habitual “be” or multi-functional “ain’t” let’s... Consider calling it a dialect-specific overt form instead of the deficit-based grammatical error or nonstandard form. Likewise, we can call the past tense verb in “Yesterday he walk to school”... A “syntactically rich zero form” instead of overlooking context and labeling it as an omission, deletion, or vernacular form. Check out our research review to find: More definitions and examples of inclusive grammar terms, Tips and links for completing functional comprehensive evaluations, and Opportunities for self-reflection on how we view dialect diversity. Join us in doing better, together. Visit the link in caption to learn more and share your preferred terms in the comments!"]