11/24/2025
When I was learning to be a therapist in the ‘80s, we were encouraged to be eclectic. I was encouraged to mix and match therapeutic models at will. As a result, I left school knowing a little about many things, and not feeling competent at anything.
Once I was introduced to Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and learned how to truly immerse myself into one model to learn its true potential, my point of view changed. To use a model well and get the outcomes demonstrated by research, one must use the evidenced-based model as designed. When one mixes evidenced-based models, one destroys the evidence-base of both, otherwise good models. While I do believe SFBT is the most versatile and best model for me and my work, I still believe there are many other excellent, evidenced-based models. If I’m going to truly “be” solution-focused, I can not allow myself to be lulled into thinking that my chosen path is the “right” path or “best” path for all.
I find it useful to think of all the various therapeutic models as different pairs of shoes. Some people have many pairs, and some have a well-worn pair. Each pair is valid in its own way, yet the key to success is to commit to wearing two shoes that match at any one time. One is welcome to change pairs if one prefers, yet committing to one pair at a time works best. Too often as I talk to new learners of the model and listen to their struggles, it becomes quite clear that the source of their struggles is that they are running around in two shoes that don’t match – a slipper and a flip flop so to speak. Once they begin to understand what this pair of shoes truly is and gain the ability to separate it out from their other pairs of shoes, they can begin to more purposefully choose which pair of shoes is best for them and their work.