03/27/2026
“We can’t burn the place down because we don’t like what they do in terms of accessibility with their local elections, but we can offer them best practices.” -Vermont SOS Sarah Copeland-Hanzas
So... about those "best practices"?
The Vermont Secretary of State's Office abruptly cancelled the remaining legislative workgroup meetings without warning and submitted their version of a best practice report to the legislature.
Please take a moment to read the entire dissension letter from Disability Rights Vermont linked below.
***
"Suddenly, DRVT had reason to believe the SOS’s office and
representatives did not enter this Act 133 process in good faith. If that was their position all along, and they had no intention of making recommendations for significant changes, they should have led with that, instead of wasting all our time and energy.
DRVT believed that this Act 133 working group was going to make robust, fully conceived recommendations for real change that would guarantee inclusiveness. DRVT believed that the result
of all of this effort would be that disabled people would no longer be having their Constitutional, and ADA rights violated, and that at a very minimum we would be ensuring that from now on, all
Vermonters with disabilities would be able to participate in meetings of local public bodies, annual municipal meetings, and local elections.
But we are concluding this process with weak
recommendations, vague best practices, and no assurances that Vermont will stop violating the rights of people with disabilities. This process fell far short to ensure universal access for all disenfranchised voters."