09/10/2025
Can you do cord blood banking and placenta encapsulation? You can-- but should you? “Umbilical cord blood contains many wonderfully precious cells, like stem cells, red blood cells, and more recently scientists have discovered that umbilical cord blood contains cancer fighting T cells.”[1] Cord blood banking companies, such as Americord and others, charge thousands of dollars for the service of stem cell preservation and storage, but many medical professionals feel their methods are both less safe and less effective than parents are led to believe. Even the terminology ‘cord blood banking’ is misleading; the blood that is being drawn comes from the newborn’s placenta, cord, and circulatory circuit. It is the baby’s blood and belongs in the baby’s body.
The average size of cord blood collections in family banks is 60mLs, but most public cord blood banks only keep donation volumes over 90-100 mLs (or about 3 ounces).[2] These amounts are in direct violation of standard pediatric guidelines which state that infants should never have more than 5% of their total blood volume drawn in any 24-hour period. If term newborns usually have about 280mLs of blood at birth, any blood drawing loss should not exceed 15mls. In most cases, 60-90 mLs of collected blood constitutes a third of a newborn’s blood volume. In case you read over that quickly, let me repeat—cord blood banking requires the removal of an average of a third of the newborn’s total body blood volume. Cord blood banking requires the removal of an average of a third of the newborn’s total body blood volume. The effects of this on the newborn are numerous, devastating, and undisputed.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7], [8]
These numbers are congruous with credible field reports. One such site states, “The median size of cord blood collections in family banks is 60mL or 2 ounces. That small volume of liquid corresponds to 470 million total nucleated cells or 1.8 million cells... Thus, most healthy full-term babies have over a million blood-forming stem cells in their umbilical cord blood. This quote raises an important distinction, which is that the relevant measurement for cord blood is not necessarily the ‘umbilical cord blood’ (from the infant/placental circuit) but the total nucleated cells within that sample. That being said, most sources indicated that a blood volume size large enough to contain the necessary number of total nucleated cells for a successful treatment needs to be in the range of 75mL to 90mL of ‘cord blood’—which is again, one-third of the average newborn’s blood volume.[9]
[1] Kelly Winder, “Why Delaying Cord Clamping Benefits Your Baby” The Outer Womb, 01, 32, December 2011
[2] Sun, Jj Et Al., “Differences in Quality Between Privately and Publicly Banked Umbilical Cord Blood Units: A Pilot Study of Autologous Cord Blood Infusion In Children With Acquired Neurologic Disorders.” Transfusion, Sept. 2010; 50(9), pp 1980-1987
[3] World Health Organization Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide, Report of A Technical Working Group, WHO/FRH/MSM/ 96.24, 1996
[4] Morley GM. “Letters.” Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 97, No.6, June 2001, pp 1024-1026.
[5] Van Rheenen P, Brabin BJ. “Late Umbilical Cord-Clamping as an Intervention for Reducing Iron Deficiency Anaemia In Term Infants in Developing and Industrialized Countries: A Systematic Review.” Annual Trop Pediatrics. 2004, 24(1), pp 3-16.
[6] Lozoff B. Jimenez E. Wolf AW. “Long Term Development Outcome in Infants with Iron Deficiency.” New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1991, pp 687-94.
[7] Hurtado EK Et Al. “Early Childhood Anemia and Mild to Moderate Mental Retardation.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 69(1), 1999, pp 115-9.
[8] ACOG Committee Opinion Number 138 - April 1994, Published in The International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 45:303-304 [54], Reaffirmed 2000.
[9] Christopher D. Hillyer, Ronald G. Strauss & Naomi L. C. Luban. Handbook of Pediatric Transfusion Medicine. Academic Press. 2004, pp. 295-
https://www.facebook.com/birthbreathanddeath/photos/fpp.549751315062891/1243920752312607/?type=3&theater
A gorgeous photo.
Thank you Lindsey Welch Photography.