Ee Dentistry at Large

Ee Dentistry at Large Dental Clinic owned by Eddy Millaray - Probably the best Website in the world! Eddy Millaray owner

10/01/2024

I am profoundly grateful for the heartfelt wishes you shared on my son’s sixteenth birthday. Your beautiful words added a special touch to this milestone, reminding us of the love and support you’ve offered since his very first day. I appreciate everything you expressed, even beyond words, as your kindness and presence have always enriched our lives. Thank you for being an integral part of our journey. I promise to reply to each of you personally; your messages truly mean the world to us!

Resorcinol-formaldehyde resin "Russian Red"Resorcinol-formaldehyde resin is a material used in endodontic therapy in man...
06/28/2019

Resorcinol-formaldehyde resin "Russian Red"

Resorcinol-formaldehyde resin is a material used in endodontic therapy in many foreign countries. It contains two potentially toxic components, formaldehyde (liquid) and resorcinol (powder). Zinc oxide or barium sulfate may be used for radiopacity. When 10% sodium hydroxide is added to the mixture, polymerization occurs, which can form a brick-hard red material that has no known solvent. Several variations in technique exist. The catalyst can be mixed in before insertion into the tooth, added after the mixture is inserted, or not used. Providers believe pulp tissue will be fixed and bacteria destroyed apical to the level of resorcinol-formaldehyde resin placement. Canals are frequently not instrumented or obturated to their full length.

A Lentulo spiral is a dental instrument used to properly distribute root canal sealer and cement evenly throughout the root canal system.

Due to the presence of rock hard Russian Red filling material in its root canal, the endodontic revision procedure to save the tooth usually seem to be too difficult or too risky to perform.
In order to reach this contaminated area, Russian Red paste had to be retrieved then, the calcified apical third of root canal system had to be cleaned and shaped. Root canal perforation and blockage risks associated with this procedure are very high.

”The Dental Implant Brands Jungle...now and Then”The use of dental implants as missing teeth solutions can have a hugely...
02/12/2018

”The Dental Implant Brands Jungle...now and Then”

The use of dental implants as missing teeth solutions can have a hugely beneficial impact not only on your smiles, but on the overall quality of your life as well. The benefits that dental implants can have on your life will greatly be maximised with the help of your dental surgeon – and with the help of the best possible dental implant type for your specific implant needs.

The formulation of your dental implant treatment plan will involve a healthy and comprehensive discussion with your dentist or dental surgeon, about the entire implant procedure and what each step will include. The type and/or brand of dental implant may also be discussed at this point – and it would be best if you have valuable information about the different brands of dental implants used nowadays, so that you can make the smartest decisions when it comes to choosing which dental implant brand is best for your needs and goals.
Brands of Dental Implants
Here is a list of the most common dental implant brands available nowadays, and a brief description of each brand’s merits:
Ankylos dental implants have been used by dental implant surgeons for more than 20 years, to provide beautiful smiles to those who have previously suffered from missing teeth. The Ankylos dental implant system is guaranteed to provide long-lasting results, with teeth restorations that look and function just like normal teeth. The patented Ankylos TissueCare Connection features a precisely engineered cylindrical taper that ensures a secure fit, so that the connection between the implant and the abutment will not be compromised.
Dentsply Friadent dental implants are made from pure titanium, and are thus known for their excellent strength. The Dentsply Friadent Plus technology has been proven to promote ossointegration, so that jaw bone quality can be improved – and more predictably successful results can be expected from the dental implant placement procedure.
Camlog dental implant systems feature the patented Tube-in-Tube design, guaranteed to provide a mechanically secure and accurate connection between the implant itself and the abutment; the design of Camlog dental implants also feature anti-rotational stability. Camlog implant systems are also known for their easy handling properties, allowing dentists and dental surgeons to go through the entire implant placement with ease.

OSSTEM implants are proven to promote excellent ossointegration between the implant itself, and the surrounding bone tissue. OSSTEM implant systems are guaranteed to have superior cleanliness, and are completely free from any residual substances.

Straumann implants are designed to reduce healing time, and are proven to obtain optimal tissue response. Straumann implant systems have a Morse taper connection which guarantees maximum implant stability.

Tatum implant systems are designed to be exceptionally strong and resistant to fracture, enabling a greatly simplified restorative process. Tatum dental implants also maximise the use of available or existing jaw bone structure.

Nobel Biocare implant systems are produced from commercially pure titanium, and are cold-worked for unmatched durability and strength. The proprietary surface, called TiUnite, produces benefits in bone formation and integration, as well as superior implant stability.

AstraTech Dental implants are designed for immediate and dental restoration, with predictable results and outstanding aesthetics. AstraTech Dental implants are also designed to use just one system for all dental implant concerns.

BioHorizons has seven dental implant systems which cover virtually all prosthetic and surgical indication. BioHorizons implants also carry a lifetime warranty, guaranteeing superior long-lasting results.

”Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate”Alveolar cleft is a bony ...
12/08/2017

”Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate”

Alveolar cleft is a bony defect in the gum of the mouth, which affects approximately 75% of cleft lip or cleft lip and palate patients. Failure to repair this defect may give rise to many problems. Although alveolar bone grafting has been widely accepted by professionals within cleft care, there is still controversy around the technique, timing, site from which bone is taken and whether artificial bone substitutes offer any benefits. One question is whether the type of graft material using artificial bone materials alone might have similar success to the traditional bone harvested from the hip when assessed clinically, by radiographic images and in reducing problems in the operated area.

This review found two small studies, one comparing a graft using a new material with a traditional graft, the other looking at the benefit of applying a special type of glue to the graft. Both studies were considered to be of poor quality and so no conclusions can be reached about whether either of these new techniques is better than the traditional type of graft.

Background:

Secondary alveolar bone grafting has been widely used to reconstruct alveolar cleft. However, there is still some controversy.

Objectives:

To compare the effectiveness and safety of different secondary bone grafting methods.

Selection criteria:

Only randomized clinical trials were selected. Patients with the diagnosis of cleft lip and alveolar process only, unilateral cleft lip and palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate involving the alveolar process and greater than 5 years of age were included.

Data collection and analysis:

Two review authors extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies independently. Disagreement between the two review authors was resolved by discussion in the review team. The first authors of the included studies were contacted for additional information, if necessary.

Main results:

Two of 582 potential studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. One trial compared alveolar bone grafting using artificial materials (InFuse bone graft substitute impregnated with BMP-2) with a traditional iliac graft. The other trial investigated the application of fibrin glue to the bone graft. Both trials were small with 21 and 27 patients and were assessed as being at high risk of bias. Any apparent differences between the interventions for outcomes in either study must therefore be treated with great caution and are not highlighted here.

Authors' conclusions:

Due to the high level of risk of bias in the two included trials there is insufficient evidence to conclude that one intervention is superior to another.

“Interventions for replacing missing teeth: implant placement at different levels in relation to crestal bone!”AbstractT...
12/07/2017

“Interventions for replacing missing teeth: implant placement at different levels in relation to crestal bone!”

Abstract

The objectives are as follows:
To determine the effects of root-formed osseointegrated dental implants placed at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest (crestal, subcrestal, or supracrestal) for replacing teeth on aesthetics, marginal bone level, implant and prosthetic failures.

Background

Description of the condition
Dental implants are biocompatible devices surgically placed in the jaw bones to replace missing teeth. Over the last few decades, dental implant-supported prostheses have become an efficient and a widespread alternative treatment option for replacing missing teeth. These dental implants directly and functionally connected with the surrounding bone were defined as 'osseointegrated' by Brånemark in 1977 (Brånemark 1977).
Clinical data show that a high success rate of dental implants (over 90%) occur if implants are properly designed and manufactured, and if they are inserted in adequately selected patients (Berglundh 2002; Esposito 1998; Roos-Jansåker 2006).

Description of the intervention

Dental implants are surgically inserted into the jaw bones to support a dental prosthesis. Several strategies, usually based on different implant surfaces, implant designs and procedures, have been explored to improve dental implant success and marginal bone levels (Hermann 2007; Tenenbaum 2003). Implant surface has been suggested to be related to marginal bone resorption. Moreover, bone level implants, with a rough surface that extends at the implant platform, were developed to improve crestal bone level close to the implant platform, whereas transmucosal implants, with a smooth surface located below the implant platform and in the supra-alveolar crest, were developed to improve the soft tissue seal (Cochran 1997). During implant surgery, the implant shoulder is usually placed at level with the crestal bone. However, in some situations, the implant shoulder is placed in a more apical or coronal position for aesthetic or functional reasons or both (Buser 2004). The location of the implant shoulder may be one of the factors that influence soft tissue and crestal bone levels surrounding an implant (Hämmerle 1996; Koutouzis 2013; Koutouzis 2014). Moreover, the cranio-caudal or vertical position of the implant may also have an impact on aesthetic, implant and prosthetic outcomes as well as on patient discomfort. This is critical when an implant is placed in the aesthetic zone, where the vertical location of the implant may jeopardize the outcomes.
How the intervention might work
Preservation of the crestal bone levels surrounding an implant is one important factor for implant success, which is also important for the aesthetic outcome. Animal studies showed the influence of the location of an implant relative to the alveolar crest on the surrounding bone and soft tissue (Hermann 2001; Jung 2008). Similarly, the implant position related to marginal bone levels has also been demonstrated that can potentially influence marginal bone changes around implants in clinical studies (Hämmerle 1996; Koutouzis 2013; Koutouzis 2014).
The first randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Hämmerle 1996), to evaluate the effect of different apico-coronal positions of transmucosal implants on tissue response, was published in 1996. At the test implant, the border between the smooth polished and rough surfaces was placed 1 mm subcrestally, while at the control it was placed at the alveolar crest. They concluded that marginal bone levels were affected by the apico-coronal location of the transmucosal implants. Furthermore, an increased marginal bone loss was found the deeper the polished surface was placed. However, no differences on clinical parameters were found between groups. Similarly, a recent RCT reported different responses in the peri-implant bone around bone level implants placed with implant shoulders at different heights in relation to the crestal bone (Koutouzis 2013; Koutouzis 2014). During this study, implants were placed at the alveolar crest or 1 mm and 2 mm subcrestally. While the crestal implants showed marginal bone loss bellow the implant platform, the marginal bone was located at or above the implant platform in the subcrestal implants. However, no statistical significant differences were found on marginal bone changes between groups. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that the implant shape may have influenced these results.

Why it is important to do this review
There is no Cochrane Review evaluating the efficiency of dental implants placed at different levels in the crestal bone. It would be of great benefit to know whether there are differences in marginal bone loss, aesthetics, implant and prosthetic failures and patient discomfort between implants placed at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest without compromising the success of the implant therapy, by conducting a rigorous systematic review of RCTs.

Objectives

To determine the effects of root-formed osseointegrated dental implants placed at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest (crestal, subcrestal, or supracrestal) for replacing teeth on aesthetics, marginal bone level, implant and prosthetic failures.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing identical dental implants positioned at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest followed up for at least 6 months after loading (whenever possible longer follow-ups will be used). Both parallel and split-mouth designs will be included. Additional treatments performed at implant placement, such as guided bone regeneration or maxillary sinus bone augmentation, will be excluded.
Quasi-randomised trials will be excluded.

Types of participants

Adults of 18 years and over who received osseointegrated root-formed dental implants.

Types of interventions

We will use the following definitions.

* Epicrestal implants (control): any implant with the implant platform placed at the crestal bone.
* Subcrestal implants (test 1): any implant with the implant platform placed bellow the crestal bone.
* Supracrestal implants (test 2): any implant with the implant platform placed above the crestal bone.

The following comparisons will be evaluated:

* epicrestal versus supracrestal;
* epicrestal versus subcrestal;
* supracrestal versus subcrestal.

Figure 1

* Open in figure viewer
Implant with the implant platform placed at the crestal bone (epicrestal), above the crest (supracrestal) and bellow the crest (subcrestal).
Types of outcome measures
Primary outcomes

1. Biological or mechanical implant failure defined as.

* Implant failure: implant mobility and removal of stable implants dictated by progressive marginal bone loss or infection. Implant failures will be divided into early (failure to establish osseointegration) and late failures (failure to maintain the established osseointegration). Implant mobility can be assessed manually or with instruments such as Periotest or resonance frequency (Osstell), with the prosthesis removed with the exception of single implants.
* Prosthesis failure: if secondary to implant failure not allowing use of the implant.

Secondary outcomes

1. Complications with special emphasis on peri-implantitis (defined as progressive peri-implant marginal bone loss with signs of inflammation) and peri-implant mucositis (as implants affected with signs of inflammation without progressive peri-implant marginal bone loss).

2. Peri-implant marginal bone level changes assessed on periapical radiographs having implant placement as baseline.

3. Pocket probing depths (PPD) at follow-up period.

4. Bleeding on probing (BOP) at implant site at follow-up period.

5. Soft tissue levels at implant site, including midbuccal soft tissue margin (in mm), interproximal papilla levels (either Jemt's papilla classification (Jemt 1997) or measured in mm), and keratinized tissue width at follow-up period.

6. Aesthetic outcomes assessed by professionals. Aesthetic outcomes can be assessed using the Pink (PES) and the White (WES) Esthetic Scores.

7. Patient satisfaction. To evaluate patient satisfaction, questionnaires such as the 14-item German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G 14) or visual analog scale (VAS) will be used.

8. Patient preference (only in split-mouth trials). Patient preference will be assessed by percentage preference for treatments received.

“ 5 Reasons Why Dentists Should Be Using a Microscope”Dental microscopes should be a standard in dentistry.Magnification...
12/02/2017

“ 5 Reasons Why Dentists Should Be Using a Microscope”

Dental microscopes should be a standard in dentistry.
Magnification has revolutionized dentistry. Magnifying an image 2–4.5x with standard loupes is clearly an asset, improving the operators visibility and thereby the ability to diagnose and provide treatment.

With magnification being the current standard of care in dentistry, why is it that the percentage of dentists using a microscope is still a minority? This article will discuss five advantages of implementing the use of a microscope in your practice.

Improved magnification: Remember when you first started using loupes and then could never practice without them because you knew what you weren’t seeing? That same feeling holds true when you go from using loupes to a microscope; wearing your loupes isn’t the same because you now know what you are missing. Dental microscopes provide a range of magnification from 2.6-16x with the average microscope dentist operating at an 8x magnification (compared to 2.5-4.5x magnification for most loupe users). This enhanced magnification can improve accuracy of tooth preparations and margins, allow for more conservative treatment, and can be kinder and gentler to adjacent teeth/restorations as well as the supporting soft tissues. Ultimately, higher magnification provides enhanced visibility in all aspects of dentistry from diagnosing to prepping, seating and finishing restorations.
Improves ergonomics: Ergonomics is one of the biggest reasons why dentists choose to use a scope. It forces you to sit upright in your chair with improved posture. This fact alone can add years to your career as a dentist by reducing strain on your neck and back. Essentially, with correct positioning and posture, your body will feel better at the end of the day.
Reduced eye fatigue/strain: The technology of loupes utilizes what is called “converging vision” due to the short working distance. This can cause eye fatigue and strain. The dental microscope functions differently. The higher magnification lens and distance from the operating field allows parallel vision of the working field, thereby reducing the strain and fatigue on the eyes.

Improved lighting: The built-in light sources on the microscopes today are halogen, xenon or LED. They allow amazing visibility and admission of light to areas in the mouth that are otherwise difficult to see, let alone access. Examples of this are common: deep interproxial decay on the mesial of 2nd molars, looking down into a post space, finishing a composite restoration. The flood of light provided by a scope is a huge benefit in providing visibility to your working field without the hassle of cables or battery packs
Documentation, education and communication: When paired with a monitor and/or camera, the microscope becomes an excellent way to document treatment as well as communicate with patients or other dentists. It can also be a good way to educate auxiliary staff.
It must be stated that there are many challenges to implementing the use of a microscope into clinical practice: cost, staff acceptance, longer procedures initially, a steep learning curve and, most of all, inconvenience. It’s not an easy thing to blend into your normal scheduled workday. That being said, the reality is, once you start using it and you experience the benefits, it’s very hard to go back.

“How To Recognize the 5 Types Of Tooth Cracks”By Jeffrey BonkCracks! The term conjures up a feeling of uneasiness or con...
12/01/2017

“How To Recognize the 5 Types Of Tooth Cracks”

By Jeffrey Bonk

Cracks! The term conjures up a feeling of uneasiness or concern. Rightfully so! For instance, a crack in a wood chair: Is the chair going to break when someone sits in it? A crack in a floor: is someone going to trip and fall? Or a crack in a tree branch: is the branch going to break off?

All are possibilities and valid questions regarding the cracks described. They are all concerning questions, but all manageable situations. The chair may be glued and repaired. The floor may be sealed and smoothed. And the branch may be trimmed. Disasters avoided!
What about tooth cracks? Again, a very uneasy feeling. But this situation carries a much greater amount of concern. Depending upon the crack position and degree, the result may be catastrophic. A tooth may be lost! This can represent a complete disaster that can include emotional, financial and functional considerations.
The question is: could the tooth crack be recognized, and could the outcome from the crack have been predicted in order to avoid a dental catastrophe? This article is written to help dentists recognize and categorize tooth cracks. Having an understanding of crack origin, etiology, symptomology and prognosis can provide better diagnosis and patient communication and may save a catastrophe from happening to our patients.
Tooth cracks are a common occurrence in dentistry. We see tooth cracks each day in our patient treatment. Diagnosing cracks and treatment planning for tooth longevity are critical factors for helping patients maintain their teeth.
One of the main considerations regarding an observed tooth crack is the question of when to intervene. Should the tooth be restored, crowned or extracted? All are possible treatments. Identifying and classifying cracks will provide some guidance as to treatment planning and treatment outcome. Many teeth with cracks can be saved! The keys are identification, understanding signs and symptoms and early detection.

The American Association of Endodontists has identified five types of tooth cracks. These types are:
* Craze lines
* Fractured cusp
* Cracked tooth
* Split root
* Vertical root fracture
Understanding and identifying these five types can provide guidance for treating cracked teeth. The vertical order of these cracks, from top to bottom, signifies the general prognosis for a particular crack. That is, craze lines have a good prognosis, whereas a vertical root fracture has a very poor prognosis.

Craze lines

Craze lines are micro-fractures of the enamel only. They may also be termed enamel infractions. The micro-fractures are contained within the enamel only. They do not pe*****te into the dentin layer.
All teeth have craze lines. They are more often seen in anterior teeth as vertical striations within the enamel. They are also seen on marginal ridges. Trans-illumination provides clear observation of craze lines.
Tooth trauma can contribute to craze lines. This trauma can be the result of blunt force or more recurrent functional forces, such as bruxism and parafunction.
There are typically no symptoms with craze lines. Treatment can be for esthetic reasons only and the prognosis is very good. Prevention of bruxism, parafunction and excessive trauma from occlusal forces is recommended

Fractured cusp

Fractured cusp is defined as a complete or incomplete fracture of the crown of the tooth extending subgingivally. The extent and degree of the fractured cusp is variable. The most common cuspal areas to fracture are the lingual cusps of the lower molars and the buccal cusps of the upper molars.
The fracture originates on the occlusal surface and extends gingivally along a buccal or lingual groove and the mesial or distal marginal ridge. Occlusal trauma/ force plays an integral role in the propagation of the fracture line. Undermined cusps from existing restorations are also a contributing factor.
The fractured cusp may break and separate entirely at the time of a traumatic event. The resultant tooth segment may be attached to the gingival tissues and be required to be removed.
The remaining exposed tooth area may be sensitive to temperature until it is restored. Alternatively, the patient may have complaints of biting or temperature sensitivity prior to the complete cuspal fracture. The biting complaints are typically pain upon compression and/or pain upon release of biting pressure. Once the fractured cusp is removed, the biting pain is relieved.
Transillumination can be helpful in fractured cusp identification. The transilluminated light will not pe*****te beyond the fractured segment into the rest of the tooth. Depending on the degree of the fracture, there is a good prognosis for retaining the tooth. Root canal therapy or crown lengthening procedures may be needed if the extent of the fractured cusp is significant. Cuspal coverage is recommended for those teeth that exhibit early fractured cusp symptoms.
Maintaining tooth integrity using crowns or onlays may prevent crack propagation and fracture. Continued and recurrent patient observation is recommended long-term.

Cracked tooth

A cracked tooth is defined as an incomplete fracture initiated from the crown and extending subgingivally. The crack is usually in a mesial-distal direction. The crack may extend through one marginal ridge or may extend through both proximal surfaces. The vertical depth of the crack is also variable.
The crack may be entirely contained within the crown of the tooth, or it may extend vertically into the root portion of the tooth. A cracked tooth is more centered, occlusally, than a fractured cusp. Also, because a cracked tooth may progress apically, rather than laterally, there is a greater chance of pulpal and periapical pathosis.
The location and extent of the crack may be difficult to determine. Some cracks are easily seen with magnification, or because they are stained from bacterial migration. Additionally, some cracks are identified with a dental explorer because they have caused a true separation of the enamel.
However, the extent of the crack on the surface enamel does not correlate directly to the extent of the crack apically. Patient symptoms are variable, as well. Some patients will exhibit temperature and/or biting pain. Others will not exhibit any symptoms.
Excessive occlusal forces are a contributing factor to creating tooth cracks. Weakened tooth structure from existing restorations also contributes to tooth cracks. Undermined cusps and marginal ridges create an environment for cracks to occur. Removal of old restorations is recommended for evaluation of crack extent and depth.
There are numerous diagnostic tests available for cracked tooth situations. Removing old restorations in the presence of a crack is a starting point. Magnification is paramount for aiding in evaluation of the extent of the crack.
The crack may be visualized extending along the pulpal floor from mesial to distal. Extending the pulpal floor to “follow” the crack apically can provide information on depth and nerve proximity.
If the crack extends apically into the interproximal area, a perio probe may be utilized to evaluate for a narrow/ isolated band of bone loss vertically down the root. This is a pathognomonic sign of root fracture (to be discussed next). Tooth staining, trans illumination or “wedging” are techniques for assessing the extent of the crack. Pulp vitality and patient symptoms will aid in determining the extent of the crack. Tooth cracks are highly variable in extent and symptoms.
Cracked tooth treatment is variable and is dependent on crack extent, operator experience, judgment and patient symptoms. There are no definitive restorative recommendations in the literature about treatment of cracked teeth. Proper diagnosis and preventive strategies are recommended for the treatment of cracked teeth.
Obviously, root canal treatment is possible if pulpal and periapical symptoms dictate need. But cracked tooth treatment may be as limited as replacement of a direct restoration to full or partial cuspal coverage. Depending upon the crack extent and depth and structural integrity of the remaining tooth, the restoring dentist must decide what mode of treatment is appropriate. The dentists experience will play a role as to whether or not and to what extent the cracked tooth is maintained and restored.
Cracked tooth prognosis is always questionable. There is always the possibility that the crack will progress, even if cuspal coverage is performed. Limiting the amount of tooth flexure is the goal with bite adjustment and cuspal protection.
But the micro-movement of tooth function can contribute to crack propagation over the long term. Not all cracked teeth are destined to fail. But depending on patient circumstances, occlusal stability and patient cooperation, a cracked tooth may eventually fail. Removing damaging habits (for example, by providing a night guard and controlling bruxism), covering cusps and counseling patents on the variability of cracked tooth treatment are recommended preventive strategies. In cases of cracked teeth, the patient should be informed of the questionable prognosis associated with this condition.

Split Tooth

"Split tooth" is defined as the complete fracture initiated from the crown extending subgingivally. It typically extends through both marginal ridges and the proximal surfaces to the proximal root. A split tooth is the end result of a cracked tooth (evolution)! The tooth segments are entirely separated. The split may occur suddenly, but is typically the result of the long-term growth from an incomplete crack.
Again, damaging habits, such as bruxism, parafunction, ice chewing, etc. contribute to crack propagation and, ultimately, a split tooth. There may be pre-existing pain with mastication, but not always.
The split segments may be visualized or by “wedging” the segments apart, but the tooth prognosis is hopeless in most cases. Sometimes a split may occur where only a single root may be affected (e.g., an upper molar root). In those cases, it may be possible to remove the “split root” and salvage the remaining tooth. Once the tooth is removed, tooth replacement may be discussed and initiated.

Vertical Root Fracture

A vertical root fracture is a complete or incomplete fracture of the root in a buccal lingual direction. The fracture may extend the length of the root or as a shorter segment along any portion of the root. There may or may not be patient symptoms associated with the fracture. Many times they are discovered on routine periapical x-rays.
Virtually all vertical root fractures are associated with a history of root canal treatment. Existence of a sinus tract or a narrow, vertical periodontal pocket along the root surface is consistent with vertical root fracture. The prognosis of vertical root fracture is virtually hopeless in all cases.
Prevention of vertical root fracture is important. Minimizing dentin removal during root canal therapy will provide better structural integrity for tooth longevity. Avoid posts and post build-ups if possible. Reduce condensation forces during root canal obliteration. Cuspal coverage following root canal treatment is always advised.
Tooth cracks represent a day-to-day finding in our dental practices. It is our goal to save teeth for a lifetime for all of our patients. Proper diagnosis and crack treatment will provide longevity and predictability of care.

Jeff Bonk, D.D.S., P.C.

Address

New York, NY
10003

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ee Dentistry at Large posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ee Dentistry at Large:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram