The 99% of Newark and East Central Ohio

The 99% of Newark and East Central Ohio This is the Official page of Your Local 99% Movement!

The 99% of Newark and East Central Ohio was created, with some inspiration from the national "Occupy" movement, out of concern for the ever-waning voice of the people in light of the accelerated drift of our society towards an oligarch. On April 4th, 2017, this group voted unanimously to merged with the Licking County Progressives to continue its important work on behalf of the "99%" and in defense of democracy as a project of the broader local progressive movement.

10/23/2024

Tonight, I am proud to say that the Licking County Democratic Party's Central Committee voted to support my resolution condemning Newark's passage of Ordinance 24-36, which criminalizes the homeless in Newark. Additionally, we called for Mayor Hall to veto the legislation as well as an endorsement for the referendum petition that we are circulating!

10/22/2024

Now that I have confirmed that a certified copy of Ordinance 24-36 (Newark's criminalization of homelessness) has been delivered to the City Auditor's office, we can begin collecting signatures to force a referendum on it.

We have until November 20th to collect 1,460 valid signatures from registered citizens in the City of Newark. The signatures have to be turned in (together, as a single document) on Wednesday, November 20th, so I am setting a goal of 2,000 signatures by Monday, November 18th.

If you want to help circulate a petition, let me know; each petition will have instructions. If you are registered to vote in the City of Newark and want to sign, let me know. The clock is ticking.

If we get enough signatures in time, this Ordinance will not become law until the people of Newark vote on it!

Let's do this!

10/21/2024

These are remarks that I am planning to give tonight to City Council before they decide on whether or not to criminalize the homeless:

I am not a Christian anymore, but I remember what I was taught in my former faith – largely by my late mother – about the responsibility that we all have to one another. It begins with the universal concept of the so-called “golden rule” wherein we are called to treat others the way we want to be treated.

I recall that in 1 Corinthians 13:13, Paul wrote “[s]o now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love”.

I recall that Jesus Christ was reported to have said in John 15:12: “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.”

I recall the many verses in the Bible which reference the way Jesus Christ saw the poor. Where was his scorn for the poor? When did he dictate to them to get out of the way and not be seen?

When I felt that my faith was slipping away for reasons too complex to mention here, I also recalled that Jesus Christ once said – in Matthew 12:31 – that the only unforgivable sin was “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”. For this reason, I elected to openly convert to agnosticism instead of letting anyone believe that I remained a believer. Just in case there is a God, I would not allow myself to violate the only law that he would punish mercilessly.

Even with my lack of faith, I stand here proud of the legacy I will leave. If I were to drop dead this very second, my children, my family, and our community will know that I fight for those without a voice, and without apprehension.

People will look at my life and know that I mean what I say and love all, unconditionally, just as I was taught by my mother, who was a devout Christian to her core through to when she drew her last breath.

I can die proudly on this hill, but I ask this of you, with this immoral proposal to punish people unfortunate enough to exist outside the confines of four walls: can you say that you will leave behind such a great legacy? Will you draw your last breath believing wholeheartedly that you held the principle of love above everything else?

Lastly, whilst you invoked the name of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the opening of tonight’s full council meeting, I hope you asked yourselves if you did so truly with your God in your hearts or as pretenders in violation of the only unforgivable sin. Thank you.

10/21/2024

Today - Monday, October 21st - is THE DAY to take a stand.

Newark City Council has its Full Council meeting tonight, starting at 7pm (40 W. Main Street). TONIGHT is the night that they will vote on Ordinance 24-36, which will (whether they want to say it or not) criminalize being homeless in Newark.

How so? While you won't be punished for walking around, you will be sanctioned (and eventually thrown in jail) for daring to rest for too long in a public space.

EVERY human being has to sleep at some point, and this ordinance will condemn you with a criminal record for sleeping anywhere but under a roof within the city.

This proposal is inhumane to its core. We must not turn a blind eye to cruelty by force of law.

10/18/2024

As promised, here is my comprehensive post on the "F" word...fascism.

I had to post it on my campaign and Xanga blogs because the post was too long for a status:

An Introduction to My Argument “Remember, Remember, the 5th of November, the gun-powder treason and plot. I know of no reason why the gun-powder treason should ever be forgot.” The poem inspired by the attempted demolition of Britain’s parliament at the hands of Guy Fawkes in 1605 was featured...

10/08/2024

I had two speeches that I prepared to deliver on October 7th to Newark City Council regarding the proposed Ordinance 24-36, which will ban "camping" and send citizens to jail for a third offense of sleeping on public grounds.

Unfortunately, after the Council President elected to shut down the first opportunity for citizen comment and move on to legislation, I wasn't able to deliver my first planned speech to them, but I did deliver the second speech.

The following is the text of both speeches, starting with my first speech that I couldn't give due to the premature conclusion of our first chance for comment:

"I stand tonight for the first of what I plan to be three pre-typed out speeches prior to this Council’s impending vote on the proposal to ban “camping” on public lands in the City of Newark. I assure you that each of these speeches will be delivered within the allotted 3 minute limit arbitrarily set – though not universally enforced – by the leadership of our elected officials.

First and foremost, I want to address the question of agency that was brought up by a concerned citizen at the last full Council meeting. I have often heard over my near-40 years of life this notion that helping people somehow diminishes that person’s worth as a human being because they are supposedly robbed of important life lessons essential to survival. While I understand the point behind this belief, I can’t help but push back against it.

You see, I am the product of a single mother. As the eldest of her four children, I remember every single major struggle endured by our immediate family; starting with the first experience we had with homelessness when I was 8 years old. I have discussed what it was like sleeping in a tent on a campground in the summer of 1993 in a “vacation” which lasted much longer than any other family’s. A vacation which included cold early-morning baths with gallon-jugs of water after we went through a daily routine of burning ticks off of our skin.

I won’t go into how we became homeless – except to say that it had nothing to do with my parents being out of work, on drugs, or having mental health issues, as each of my parents were healthy, clean, and working at the time -, but I will say that after my parents divorced, my mother often had to get help from government programs to ensure that us kids were taken care of.

Did that off and on experience of my early life produce useless drains on society? No. Rather, despite our struggles as well as our mother’s early demise thanks to cancer the four of us kids have found varying degrees of success in our existence. My oldest sister owns her own home that she helped build. My youngest sister lives on her own without any help in Columbus. My brother has been surviving without any government help for the past 7 years. And me? Well, I stand here as the proud father of two amazing kids, as a manager of a local grocery store, and a citizen who refuses to sit back and watch injustice in silence.

So, as we contemplate the path ahead, I ask that you consider the story of my family as well as that of so many others like mine. Because of a system which saw our worth and sought to help lift us up instead of drown, we were able to prosper in our own small way. While we may not be completely out of the woods, the agency that was restored to us has given us a second chance. A second chance that I hope we will collectively give to the downtrodden unfortunate enough to live outside of a home. Thank you."

Now, here is the second speech which was delivered:

"Is the proposal coming soon for your consideration a “criminalization of the homeless”? Members of council have protested the notion that this is effectively what will happen, and I hope to explain why it is that we can justifiably argue that the proposed ordinance to ban “camping” will effectively criminalize the state of homelessness in Newark.

Consider, for a second, the three basic things which all animals – including us humans – must do. For starters, all animals must consume both water and food. Secondly, all animals must then dispense with what they’ve consumed. But, what is the third and unavoidable part of life which is inescapable for all animals…including us? Sleep. We can not survive without the required minimum sleep that our bodies need. It is this last part which serves as the key factor in asserting that your proposed ordinance criminalizes the homeless, for it punishes the citizens of Newark who dare to exist outside the confines of four walls.

If you will indulge in a thought experiment with me for a second, I ask that you imagine if Licking County as a whole followed our lead in adopting this ban. Then, what if every county in the United States followed one by one? Where would the growing homeless population of this country go? Do you even care, or is this just the latest version of someone saying they want the crisis to be handled as long as it isn’t in our backyard?

In reading and listening to the concerns of the citizens who’ve been crying for help in dealing with criminal activity, I have noticed that nothing about this ordinance actually addresses the bulk of their concerns; unless we presuppose that all homeless people are criminals with a goal of chasing them away. A man wielding an ax will still be able to appear in front of our neighbors houses. People will still be able to roam the streets late at night. Getting scared by some mystery person shouting in windows will not be stopped. No, these concerns will not be dealt with here, because each of those cries for help require more police, not banning people from sleeping on benches; and unfortunately hiring more police requires money that our officials claim we do not have while they approve their own pay raises using our tax-dollars once every four years.

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, however, I will say that it is possible that your intentions mean well. You may not mean to be cruel, but the end result of this proposed ordinance will be cruelty by the force of law. Even so, it is incumbent upon the people we elect to push back against the lies which allow this resentment for those suffering to fester, lest your goal is the exploitation of fear.

Finally, to my fellow citizens of this city I have called home for 31 of my 39 years of life, I ask that you consider the manipulation of your emotions by those in power. After all, we are all one crisis away from being homeless ourselves and being criminalized by an ordinance written with the purported best of intentions. Thank you."

Remember, City Council will decide the fate of our local homeless population on Monday, October 21st at 7pm at 40 W. Main Street (Newark, Ohio) when they vote the proposal up or down.

PLEASE plan to show up and stand against this draconian proposal.

We do have options if and when they pass it, but it is important that they see and hear your opposition to such a callous approach to policy.

Mark your calendars and stand with our downtrodden brothers and sisters!

12/13/2023

Missing Linda today.

04/19/2022
11/18/2021

Rest in Peace, Linda.

We will have more to say about her in the near future.

10/27/2021

The framers of the Constitution knew the horrors of NOT separating church and state. Why are so many denying their wisdom today? (jkl)

08/24/2021

At a time when public trust in Congress is low and partisan dysfunction is high, a select group of lawmakers is leading the way on improving citizen engagement and operations on Capitol Hill.

08/17/2021

The Ohio Redistricting Commission has announced its first schedule of public hearings. Ten hearings at college campuses are scheduled:

Monday, August 23, 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Cleveland
Monday, August 23, 2:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Youngstown
Tuesday, August 24, 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Dayton
Tuesday, August 24, 2:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Cincinnati
Wednesday, August 25, 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Zanesville
Wednesday, August 25, 2:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Rio Grande
Thursday, August 26, 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Lima
Thursday, August 26, 2:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Toledo
Friday, August 27, 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Akron
Friday, August 27, 2:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Mansfield

Information about locations and parking, etc:
https://mcusercontent.com/83058efadac7fd9d118aa89ee/files/5cf2973d-b8d2-2ef6-1558-1dc81ffdc229/2021_Ohio_Redistricting_Commission_regional_hearing_schedule.pdf?

You can sign up here if you intend to present testimony at one of these public hearings.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeixCcsODBgrqiZww6_qZ36buiK2m_X2wDEhnzCyEBspJ6k3A/viewform

We are also happy to review your testimony beforehand.
Simply email us a copy at fairdistrictsohio2021@gmail.com.

08/17/2021
08/14/2021

Voters in dark on progress for redistricting

Ohio could have taken a different route to the improved redrawing of state legislative and U.S. House districts. Some states have adopted the idea of an independent commission, seeking to remove politicians and their operatives as much as possible.

The political crowd here, especially Republicans in command at the Statehouse, exclaimed: No, no, no, that isn’t necessary! They spoke reassuringly about working in a bipartisan way to produce a better outcome, one at a high-minded distance from the current extreme gerrymandering, in which Republicans have locked down comfortable majorities.

Now the moment has arrived to prove their sincerity. For the first time, elected leaders will apply their increasingly sophisticated software and reams of data under a new system for redistricting, driven by state constitutional amendments approved by voters in 2015 and 2018. In essence, the new system is a compromise. Politicians still get to draw the lines. They must do so according to the spirit and guidelines endorsed by voters.

What did voters embrace? For starters, transparency and engagement, in particular through public hearings. The new system promotes holding communities together. It aspires to representational fairness, or districts that reflect the preferences in how Ohioans actually vote.

Put another way, the current makeup of the Ohio congressional delegation, 12 Republicans and four Democrats, runs counter to reality at the polls, the parties closer to an even split. Recall that voters overwhelmingly approved the new system, in the range of 70%, the measures prevailing in all 88 counties.

No question, the coronavirus pandemic has complicated the process, delaying the arrival of census numbers, from April to this week, with the state facing an all but impossible Sept. 1 deadline for producing new state legislative districts. Ohio will lose another U.S. House seat, dropping to 15 because of national population shifts.

In May, the Fair Districts coalition, an indispensable advocate for redistricting reform, wrote a letter to Gov. Mike DeWine and other state leaders. The letter outlined steps that could be taken to get ready for redistricting, such as establishing a schedule for public hearings and setting up a website.

The response? Disappointing, if hardly surprising.

The governor called for the redistricting commission to meet for the first time this past Friday. The seven members are the governor, secretary of state, auditor and four state lawmakers. The commission has the task of redrawing state legislative districts, approval requiring the support of at least two members of each political party. It gets the job of redrawing U.S. House lines if the state legislature fails.

What else has been done to prepare? Ohioans really have no idea. The expected transparency has been missing. It is hard to believe the Republican majorities have let things slide.

As Catherine Turcer of Common Cause Ohio put it, the concern isn’t that Republicans are dragging their feet. Rather, it’s that 'they’re doing work behind the scenes that we can’t watch.'

Michael Douglas is a retired Beacon Journal editorial page editor. Email mddouglasmm@gmail.com

© The Advocate.Powered by TECNAVIA

o

08/12/2021

NOTE FROM TED: TEDx events are independently organized by volunteers. The guidelines we give TEDx organizers are described in more detail here: http://storag...

Address

Newark, OH
43055

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The 99% of Newark and East Central Ohio posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The 99% of Newark and East Central Ohio:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram