10/27/2025
Check our Fellows Journal Club for the month: ‘MR Imaging versus Noncontrast CT for Selecting Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke of Large Vessel Occlusion for Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’
Though EVT was safer and tended to be more effective in patients selected by MRI, the differential outcomes based on the treatment window deserve attention and highlight the importance of timely intervention. More advanced imaging is typically used in practice to refine patient selection in the extended time window. Yet, results of this study suggest that beyond 6 hours, the choice of imaging technique may actually become less impactful on overall outcomes. This suggests that in extended time windows, the focus should perhaps shift more toward ensuring rapid access to EVT rather than the choice of imaging technique. Access to treatment and avoiding exclusion of patients with LVO who may benefit from EVT should be prioritized. In that sense, NCCT remains a valid option because of its rapid acquisition and widespread availability. While MRI may refine patient selection and reduce the chances of futile recanalization, it can overestimate the size of the ischemic core and lead to inappropriate exclusion from treatment of patients who can benefit from reperfusion. Future research should further investigate the merits of these 2 imaging modalities, balancing precision with accessibility and the competing interests of reducing rates of futile recanalization while maximizing the identification of good candidates for EVT. https://www.ajnr.org/content/46/10/2026 ☢️