04/28/2026
A patient recently shared a Facebook post with me claiming that chiropractic is pseudoscience, rooted in New Age philosophy, and that chiropractors “aren’t real doctors.”
The author of the post, Marcia Montenegro, appears to speak primarily from her experience critiquing New Age religion—not from credentials in chiropractic education, biomechanics, neurology, rehabilitation, or musculoskeletal care.
That matters, because posts like this often contain just enough historical truth to sound convincing while leaving out the parts that actually matter.
Yes, D.D. Palmer and B.J. Palmer used language and ideas in early chiropractic history that do not reflect how much of the profession practices today. Early chiropractic history included concepts that many modern chiropractors would not use, defend, or teach the same way now.
But that is true of almost every healthcare profession if you go back far enough.
What gets left out is how much chiropractic has evolved.
Modern chiropractic care is grounded in anatomy, neurology, biomechanics, movement assessment, clinical reasoning, and patient outcomes. Research on spinal manipulation, manual therapy, low back pain, neck pain, headaches, mobility, and function continues to grow—and that research is not limited to chiropractic journals. Chiropractic-related research has appeared in major medical and scientific publications, including journals such as JAMA, BMJ, and the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.
The focus of modern chiropractic care is not “curing every disease under the sun.” It is helping people move better, reduce pain, improve function, and support the body’s ability to heal and adapt.
Then there is the tired claim that chiropractors are “not real doctors.”
Chiropractors are not medical doctors. We do not claim to be. We are licensed healthcare providers with doctoral-level training in a distinct branch of healthcare, just as dentists, optometrists, and other doctoral-level providers have their own scopes of practice.
The chiropractic approach is different because we tend to look at the body through the lens of function. We ask what may be interfering with normal movement, balance, nerve communication, recovery, and adaptation. My goal is not to replace medicine. My goal is to help people find conservative, non-drug, non-surgical solutions whenever appropriate.
At the end of the day, the most important question is not what someone on Facebook says.
The real question is this:
Is the care helping you move better, feel better, function better, and live with more confidence?
That is the standard I hold myself to every day.