03/02/2026
Aphasia Research Highlights ๐ ๐ โฃ
โฃ
๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐/๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒโฃ
โฃ
โฃ
๐ง๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐โฃ
In this study, researchers examined how picture exposure time and response delay influence naming and repetition in aphasia. Nineteen participants completed naming with long (3000 ms) versus brief (100 ms) picture exposure and 1- versus 5-second repetition delays.โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
๐ฆ๐ง๐ข๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐โฃ
This study examined the subtle narrative impairments of individuals who score above the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) cutoff for aphasia/โnot aphasic by WABโ (NABW) but still report communication difficulty. Using the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in communication in aphasia (BATS), the authors compared story retell performance across non-aphasic controls, NABW, mild anomic, and anomic groups. โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ช๐โฃ
This qualitative study examined how aphasia affects romantic relationships and evaluated a 4-week intimacy-focused support group for people with aphasia (PWA) and their partners called โRekindling with Aphasia.โ Interviews revealed four key relational themes: reduced self-worth (โwaitingโ to feel normal again), unequal agency and caregiver-role shifts, guilt limiting emotional disclosure, and decreased physical intimacy.โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ ๐ฃ๐ง๐ข๐ ๐ฆโฃ
In this cross-sectional study of 77 aphasia caregivers, Cao et al. (2026) examined whether perceived caregiving burden was associated with depressive symptoms and whether friendship support moderated this relationship. โฃ
โฃ
โฃ
โฃ