Healing with Organic RN

12/23/2025

One of the most telling signs of potential immune disruption from COVID-19 vaccines, particularly mRNA boosters, is the observed reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (shingles).

The recent University of Groningen study in Drug Safety (analyzing over 2 million records) found a temporary increase in shingles risk post-vaccination:

• +7% overall within 28 days

• +21% after mRNA boosters

• Up to +38% in certain subgroups

Researchers point to a short-term decrease in immune surveillance, likely from transient lymphocyte depletion or reduced T-cell function—the very cells that keep the dormant virus in check. This allows the latent virus to reactivate.

Far from "overstimulation," the evidence leans toward transient immune suppression or modulation: temporary lymphopenia (low lymphocyte counts) and impaired VZV-specific T-cell immunity have been documented post-vaccination, mirroring effects seen in other vaccines or stressors that trigger shingles.

While some hypothesize TLR activation (innate immune stimulation) could play a role, the dominant explanation across studies is a brief window of weakened cell-mediated immunity—not hyperactivity—letting the virus escape latency.

This isn't just a minor rash for many: Severe shingles in older adults is linked to up to 7x higher dementia risk in separate research.

These findings highlight yet another concerning immune trade-off with repeated shots, where even small, transient disruptions can have outsized consequences.

🔗 Study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-025-01638-2

🔗 Article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15396687/Covid-boosters-linked-virus-dementia.html

12/22/2025

A recent article by researcher Marcella Piper-Terry dives deep into the potential protective effects of natural measles infection, arguing that far from being a purely dangerous disease, it may offer significant long-term health benefits that we've lost in the vaccine era.

In the pre-vaccine years, measles mortality in the U.S. had already plummeted by over 98% thanks to better nutrition, sanitation, and living conditions—long before the 1963 vaccine rollout.

Doctors from that time often described measles as a mild, inevitable childhood rite of passage, typically resolving in about a week for most kids aged 3-7, with many parents noting afterward how much stronger and healthier their children seemed.

One physician observed that "in the majority of children the whole episode has been well and truly over in a week... and many mothers have remarked ‘how much good the attack has done their children,’ as they seem so much better after the measles."

Research highlighted in the piece suggests that recovering from natural measles trains the immune system in profound ways, potentially lowering lifetime risks for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, atopic conditions like asthma, eczema, and hay fever, as well as cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Babies born to mothers with natural measles immunity also get far stronger and longer-lasting passive protection than those from vaccinated moms.

The most striking part explores documented cases where natural measles infection triggered spontaneous cancer remission.

One standout example is an 8-year-old boy in Africa with advanced Burkitt's lymphoma: after four months of progressive orbital swelling confirmed by biopsy, he contracted measles, developed the rash, and over the next two weeks his massive tumor completely regressed without any chemotherapy.

The timing matched peak viral activity, and experts concluded the measles virus directly destroyed the tumor cells, which express high levels of the SLAM receptor that measles targets.

Remission lasted at least four months, with seroconversion confirming the infection's role.

Similar regressions were reported in the British Medical Journal (1973) for a 23-month-old with infantile Hodgkin's lymphoma post-measles, in The Lancet (1981) for another Hodgkin's case, and in a 2013 review noting 16 spontaneous Hodgkin's remissions overall, five in children following measles—mostly the mixed cellularity subtype.

These historical observations mirror modern oncology, where engineered measles viruses (derived from vaccine strains) are now used in oncolytic virotherapy to treat refractory cancers like multiple myeloma, with promising results from trials at the Mayo Clinic and coverage in outlets like CNN.

On the flip side, childhood cancer rates have risen steadily since the 1970s rollout of the combined MMR vaccine.

Today, around 9,900-10,000 U.S. kids under 15 are diagnosed annually, with leukemia, brain tumors, and lymphomas leading causes of cancer-related death in children.

The article raises pointed concerns about MMR vaccines being grown on aborted fetal cell lines, potentially introducing residual human DNA fragments that could integrate into a child's genome during critical developmental windows (like the 12-15 month vaccination schedule), creating "hotspots" for genetic changes linked to cancer—citing research from Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute.

Ultimately, Piper-Terry contends that by vaccinating away natural measles, we may have removed a key immune-maturity event, trading short-term prevention for elevated risks of chronic diseases and cancers down the line.

This is powerful food for thought—especially for parents weighing risks and benefits.

🔗 The full piece is eye-opening: https://marcellapiperterry.substack.com/p/measles-and-cancer-measles-can-be

12/18/2025

Alarming results from a 2024 study in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Association show that loneliness is worse for your health than alcohol abuse, obesity, or even smoking 15 ci******es a day.
Read More: https://bit.ly/4cYsKCB

12/12/2025

What you should know about BREASTFEEDING! Eye opening stuff! Even pumping and bottle feeding have drawbacks…

She discovered that breast milk changes its formula based on whether the baby is a boy or girl. Then she found something even more shocking: the baby's spit tells the mother's body what medicine to make.

2008 Katie Hinde stood in a California primate research lab staring at data that didn't make sense.

She was analyzing milk samples from rhesus macaque mothers—hundreds of samples, thousands of measurements.
And the pattern was impossible to ignore:
Mothers with sons produced milk with higher fat and protein concentrations.
Mothers with daughters produced larger volumes with different nutrient ratios.
The milk wasn't the same. It was customized.
Her male colleagues dismissed it immediately. "Measurement error." "Random variation." "Probably nothing."
But Katie Hinde trusted the numbers. And the numbers were screaming something revolutionary:
Milk wasn't just food. It was a message.
For decades, science had treated breast milk like gasoline—a delivery system for calories and nutrients. Simple fuel.
But if milk was just nutrition, why would it be different for sons versus daughters?
Katie kept digging.
She analyzed over 250 mothers across more than 700 sampling events. And with each analysis, the picture became clearer—and more astonishing.
Young, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but dramatically higher cortisol (stress hormone) levels.
Babies who drank this high-cortisol milk grew faster but were more nervous, more vigilant, less confident.
The milk wasn't just feeding the baby's body. It was programming the baby's temperament.
Then Katie discovered something that seemed almost impossible.
When a baby nurses, tiny amounts of saliva travel back through the ni**le into the mother's breast tissue.
That saliva contains information about the baby's immune status.
If the baby is fighting an infection, the mother's body detects it—and begins producing specific antibodies within hours.
The white blood cell count in the milk would jump from 2,000 to over 5,000 during illness. Macrophage counts would quadruple.
Then, once the baby recovered, everything would return to normal.
It was a conversation. A biological dialogue between two bodies.
The baby's spit told the mother what was wrong. The mother's body responded with exactly the medicine needed.
A language invisible to science for centuries.
Katie joined Harvard in 2011 and started digging into existing research.
What she found was disturbing: there were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The world's first food—the substance that nourished every human who ever lived—was scientifically neglected.
So she started a blog with a deliberately provocative title: "Mammals Suck...Milk!"
Within a year: over a million views. Parents, doctors, scientists asking questions research had ignored.
Her discoveries kept coming:

Milk changes throughout the day (fat peaks mid-morning)
Foremilk differs from hindmilk (babies who nurse longer get higher-fat milk at the end)
Over 200 types of oligosaccharides in human milk that babies can't even digest—they exist solely to feed beneficial gut bacteria
Every mother's milk is unique as a fingerprint

In 2017, she delivered a TED talk that millions have watched.
In 2020, she appeared in Netflix's "Babies" docuseries, explaining her discoveries to a global audience.
Today, at Arizona State University's Comparative Lactation Lab, Dr. Katie Hinde continues revealing how milk shapes infant development from the first hours of life.
Her work informs care for fragile infants in NICUs. Improves formula for mothers who can't breastfeed. Shapes public health policy worldwide.
The implications are profound.
Milk has been evolving for 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs.
What science dismissed as "simple nutrition" was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth.
Katie Hinde didn't just study milk.
She revealed that the most ancient form of nourishment was also the most intelligent—a dynamic, responsive conversation between two bodies that has been shaping human development since the beginning of our species.
All because one scientist refused to accept that half the conversation was "measurement error."
Sometimes the most revolutionary discoveries come from paying attention to what everyone else dismisses.

12/10/2025

Learn more about the harms of “well” visits and so-called preventative medicine in the book Your Baby, Your Way, which I recommend all expectant couples and new parents read. More via this Amazon referred link==>> https://amzn.to/491WEGn

12/08/2025

I have an alternative that has absolutely no side effects of interact with no medications and it’s totally natural

🚨 Damning new evidence confirms what many clinicians have quietly feared: the blockbuster weight-loss jabs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro) are triggering muscle wasting on a scale that mimics a decade of ageing in months.

A sweeping evidence review, led by Dr Gillian Hatfield at the University of British Columbia and published across multiple peer-reviewed journals, has laid bare the collateral damage:

• Between 40–50 % of total weight lost on GLP-1 drugs is lean tissue—predominantly muscle

• The rate and extent of sarcopenia now being documented “closely resembles that seen after gastric bypass surgery, advanced cancer, or ten years of normal ageing”

• Frailty scores are rising; falls and mobility issues are already appearing in real-world cohorts, particularly in patients over 50

Dr Hatfield’s verdict is blunt:
“This magnitude of muscle loss is not benign. It is the kind of change we normally only see in catastrophic illness or prolonged immobilisation.”

While the drugs undeniably slash cardiovascular risk and deliver rapid weight reduction, the review makes clear that these benefits are being purchased at a steep physiological price—one that drugmakers’ original trials systematically downplayed by rarely reporting body-composition data.

Even when patients follow standard exercise and calorie-deficit advice, muscle loss remains severe unless aggressive, structured resistance training (minimum 2–3 sessions per week) and high protein intake are implemented from day one.

Most users are receiving neither.

The uncomfortable truth: these are not “lifestyle” medications.

They are potent pharmacological interventions with profound, lasting effects on body composition—effects that may permanently compromise strength, metabolic health and independence for millions who were sold a simple “skinny shot”.

If you’ve been told Ozempic is a safe, easy fix, you haven’t been told the full story.

🔗 Full report:https://www.ukactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GLP-1-medications-and-muscle-mass-preservation.-Implications-and-recommendations.pdf