05/09/2026
Take a look at who voted yes, and who voted no. If they voted NO, they voted for big pesticide companies profits to continue rising and voted against our right to sue if any of those pesticides make us sick. Keep your eye on who’s throwing you under the bus. 
How did your U.S. Representative vote? SEE HERE: tinyurl.com/A28Votes
We notched another victory against Bayer-Monsanto, Big Chemical, and Big Ag.
Three poison pills in the 2026 Farm Bill—Sections 10205, 10206, and 10207—that would have given Bayer and the pesticide industry immunity from pesticide-harm lawsuits, were removed from the bill when the Luna Amendment passed the House, with 207 Democrats and 73 Republicans voting in favor of stripping Big Ag's pesticide immunity provisions from the Farm Bill.
These provisions would have taken away people's right to sue when harmed by toxic pesticides, and states' rights to require more protective labeling than what is required by extremely weak federal EPA pesticide regulations. The immunity provisions were put into the Farm Bill by Rep. Glenn "GT" Thompson (R-PA), who took $602,355 in campaign contributions from Big Ag during the 2023-24 session alone.
On the morning of April 30, 2026, Amendment 28/Roll Call 148 presented by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) to remove the three provisions passed on a bipartisan vote of 280-142.
Who voted YES for Amendment 28 to protect America's health and constitutional rights? And who voted NO against the Amendment in order to protect the poison pushers' profits? The roll call votes make it clear. Click through to see a state by state recap of who should be voted out in the November elections.
Regardless of party, U.S. Representatives that voted NO will continue to throw Americans under the bus for Bayer-Monsanto. Representatives that voted NO must GO. Speak with your vote! tinyurl.com/A28Votes
