05/20/2026
If you have POTS, your diagnostic journey almost certainly led you to a cardiologist. 👇
And that appointment probably ended one of two ways.
Some of you left validate as you finally have your POTS diagnosis, which is exactly what you came for. After years of being dismissed, someone put a name to what you have been experiencing and that mattered enormously.
Others left frustrated and feeling gaslit. Despite how bad you feel every single day, you were told you do not have POTS. Or testing was normal. Or you were handed a vague explanation that left you no closer to understanding what is actually happening. Sometimes that is true gaslighting. Other times it is a provider who is simply not a strong communicator, which is not unique to cardiology. It is a recurring theme across medicine. Either way you walked out with less clarity than you deserved.
Before talking about where cardiology falls short, it is worth being clear about where it does not.
- What cardiology is excellent at
Evaluating heart structure, electrical conduction, valvular function, and true cardiovascular pathology. When those things need to be ruled out, cardiology is exactly who you want.
When that workup comes back normal, which it does in the overwhelming majority of POTS patients, that is actually important information. It confirms the heart itself is not the source of the problem. The cardiovascular symptoms are real, but that system isn’t the cause.
- What the standard workup looks like
Echocardiogram, EKG, Holter monitor, Orthostatic vital signs, and often Tilt table testing in many cases.
Appropriate tools for the questions cardiology is trained to ask. The problem is not the tools. It’s what to do with the results of these tools when everything is normal but orthostatic/tilt table testing.
- Where treatment falls short
Once POTS is identified and structural pathology is ruled out, the treatment conversation looks like this.
Salt, fluids, electrolytes, and compression stockings. Trialing a variety of medications: Fludrocortisone, Midodrine, Beta blockers or ivabradine, and Pyridostigmine. IV fluids may be recommended but most have to fight to get them.
Who has already had this treatment and what were the results? Who thinks if they could get some of these they may feel better?
The honest reality the research confirms: there are no FDA-approved medications specifically for POTS. Every medication on that list is off-label. A systematic review of every available randomized controlled trial for POTS concluded there are no well-powered studies guiding treatment.
Every one of those treatments is aimed at the same target, even if how it works is slightly different. The cardiovascular numbers: heart rate and blood pressure. Every one of them is treating the downstream effect of the problem, not the problem itself.
This is why heart rate can improve on medication while dizziness, brain fog, fatigue, and post-exertional crashes remain completely unchanged. The heart rate was never the source. It was the compensation. Treating the compensation while the source goes unaddressed is why managing rather than recovering becomes the norm, and why so many people eventually stop trying altogether. That is heartbreaking and my goal is to empower people to finally get help.
- Why this is not the cardiologist's fault
As annoyed as you are with your cardiologist because you want them to do something more, they are also frustrated. They just do not do a great job conveying it.
They are being asked to help hundreds of thousands of people being sent to their offices, and they know they do not actually have a solution for you. Because they know, time and time again, from doing extensive testing, it is not a cardiac issue. They are being handed a problem that does not belong in their lane, with no clear path to refer you somewhere that can actually address it, and no tools available to them that meet what is actually happening.
POTS was classified as a cardiac arrhythmia until 2022. Of course the treatment model is cardiovascular. The entire institutional framework was built around the wrong classification from the start. That misclassification is still failing people today, even though it’s known to be a type of dysautonomia.
The next posts in this series get into what the research actually shows is driving POTS at a neurological and physiological level, and what a more complete approach looks like when the right questions finally get asked.
💬 What was your cardiology experience like navigating POTS? Did you leave validated, frustrated, or somewhere in between?
📌 Steinberg RS et al. US Cardiology Review. 2023;17:e13. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.35 Lau DH et al. Heart Lung Circ. 2026;35(2):171–185. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2025.09.004 Wells R et al. Systematic review of randomized trials for POTS. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2025.