01/27/2026
I find myself overwhelmed by two distinct waves of grief in response to the ongoing violence and political turmoil in this country. The first wave comes unexpectedly, triggered by graphic videos and urgent news about federal agents fatally shooting U.S. citizens during immigration enforcement operations. These tragedies are both deeply disturbing and, for many of us, feel inescapable amid a relentless news cycle dominated by protests, official statements, and competing narratives about what actually occurred in Minneapolis and beyond.
The second wave of grief hits as I witness the public and social media response. I see people I know and care about-those who are kind, compassionate, and loving in real life reduced to reflexive rage, meme sharing, and tribalistic commentary online. Instead of grappling with the complexity of loss and the profound questions raised by these events, much of the discourse becomes performative, shallow, or driven by outrage. This contributes to a shared sense that our collective response has become a spectacle, overshadowing both accountability and empathy.
All of this unfolds against the background of everyday social media content like vacation photos, pet videos, advertisements, celebratory posts as if state violence and national grief are just another item in the algorithmic feed. That juxtaposition only deepens the emotional dissonance, making it harder to process the scale of loss and the fractured nature of our public conversation about it.
The emotional weight I’m describing reflects something real and profound: we are trying to make sense of violence carried out in the name of law or order, mourning lives lost, and confronting how collective outrage, social media dynamics, and political polarization amplify pain rather than heal it. That second wave, the frustration with the response to grief isn’t shallow. It’s a signal of how disoriented we are as a society when tragedy becomes a meme and empathy gets drowned out by discord.