Chiropractic Associates of Westlake

Chiropractic Associates of Westlake The Premier Chiropractic Care Facility in Westlake staffed with highly trained healthcare profession

04/29/2025

🚨 New CDC pediatric vaccine schedule: 94 doses by age 18! 😱

In 2020, the schedule was 72 shots.

03/12/2025

Just sayn. 😃

04/23/2024

Another eye opening report.

The Troubling Legacy of Merc’s HPV Vaccines
The vaccine that’s supposed to prevent cancer can actually cause cancer?
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent virus that many women encounter at some point in their lives, and there are more than 30 strains of HPV that can cause ge***al infections. The HPV vaccine is designed to protect against four strains, with only two of them known to be linked to cancer.
Actual complications from the virus are uncommon. Dr. Diane Harper, who participated in HPV vaccine testing during phases II and III, noted that symptoms are typically absent, and the body resolves about 90% of infections within two years. Furthermore, only half of the remaining infections have a slight chance of progressing to precancerous cells that could potentially lead to cervical cancer.
While most cervical cancer cases are HPV-related, most women with HPV do not develop cervical cancer. Nonetheless, Big Pharma advocates for every girl and young woman to receive the vaccine "just in case."
If you have a teenage daughter, her doctor has likely discussed the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine with you. They’ll tell you that the studies show it’s “safe and effective” and prevents cervical cancer.
But is this true?
On May 18, 2006, the FDA held a meeting of the “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee” (VRBPAC). We found the summary document on FDA.gov, and at the bottom of page 13, we discovered some important data. Get this! The Gardasil vaccine appears to increase cancer risk by 44.6% in people who are already carriers of the same HPV strains used in the vaccines. Isn’t that ironic? The vaccine that’s supposed to prevent cancer can actually cause cancer?
Merck's quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil, introduced in 2006, has faced significant scrutiny for its safety profile and numerous adverse effects. After Gardasil's introduction in the United States in 2006, a study examining adverse events from 2006 to 2009 uncovered concerning statistics compared to meningococcal vaccination:
• There were 26.5 times more disability events.
• Emergency department visits increased by 8.5 times
• Life-threatening events occurred 10 times more often.
• Hospitalizations were 12.5 times more frequent.
Despite safety concerns raised during clinical trials and mounting reports of horrible adverse reactions, regulatory bodies approved subsequent vaccine versions, including the nine-valent Gardasil 9. These approvals came despite evidence linking Gardasil to serious vaccine injuries and deaths, particularly among young women.
Notwithstanding the mounting evidence indicating injuries linked to the vaccine, the Big Pharma behemoth continues to repeat the biggest lie ever sold and promote Gardasil as "safe and effective." Merck fast-tracked Gardasil's FDA approval process despite failing (and continues to fail) to meet one of the four criteria the FDA requires for fast-track approval. Gardasil is demonstrably neither safer nor more effective than Pap screening combined with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in preventing cervical cancers, nor can it improve the diagnosis of serious cervical cancer outcomes.
Lawsuits assert that Merck conducted clinical trials deceitfully to hide severe side effects and overstate the vaccine's efficacy. But the FDA wasn’t the only culprit; while Gardasil awaited the CDC's regulatory process, then-director Julie Gerberding facilitated its approval following the drug's FDA authorization in 2006. As a reward, in 2010, she was appointed president of Merck Vaccines. Not surprisingly, according to a 2000 U.S. House of Representatives investigation report, most of the CDC’s eight Committee on Immunization Practices members had conflicts of interest.
Sadly, the same year Gerberding hooked up with Merck, a 16-year-old girl lost her vision completely after HPV vaccination, as reported by the Journal of Child Neurology on Feb. 25, 2010.

The year after Gerberding received her reward, in 2011, a U.S. study uncovered a startling revelation: post-Gardasil Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) within six weeks after vaccination was 2.5 to 10 times higher compared to the norm, surpassing rates seen with other vaccines.
In August 2012, Colombia added Gardasil into its national immunization schedule. By August 2014, over 700 girls in El Carmen de Bolivar reported mysterious symptoms following recent Gardasil injections. Here’s a video by Mario Lamo Jimenez, a journalist we interviewed for “The Truth About Vaccines” docu-series, confirming these adverse reactions.
Despite the significant number of severe injuries attributed to the HPV vaccine, a 2019 paper dismissed them as a "mass psychogenic illness." However, how could individuals who are wheelchair-bound, visually impaired, or bedridden not have a genuine illness? These cases are authentic, thoroughly documented, and undeniable.
Then, in 2013, a Danish-Swedish collaboration involving nearly 1 million girls aged 10 to 17 unearthed some eyebrow-raising connections. They found significant links between the HPV vaccine and various ailments, including Behcet’s syndrome (3.37 times more likely), Raynaud’s disease (1.67 times more likely), and Type 1 diabetes (1.29 times more likely).
Fast forward to 2017, when another study involving a whopping 3 million women aged 18 to 44 uncovered a laundry list of adverse events following HPV vaccination, including pemphigus vulgaris, encephalitis, myelitis, Addison’s disease, lupus erythematosus, celiac disease, Raynaud’s disease, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.
A 2020 systematic review in Denmark, encompassing 79,102 females and 16,568 males across 24 trials, revealed a 49% elevation in serious nervous system disorders among those administered HPV vaccines compared to “active controls” (which included other vaccines). That’s right! Not compared to a true placebo (like a saline injection), but compared to “active controls” (other vaccines and/or aluminum-based adjuvants). Most control group subjects received a pseudo placebo containing the same aluminum compound as Gardasil. Yet Gardasil still resulted in 49% more adverse effects.
But that’s not all the statistical gimmicks and sleight-of-hand flimflams Merck has used in the past! In scientific research, double-blind placebo trials are widely regarded as the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of new drugs. These trials aim to minimize bias by randomly assigning participants to either a "treatment" group receiving the drug or a "control" group receiving a pharmacologically inert placebo. Neither the patients nor the researchers know who received the drug or the placebo, reducing the potential for bias in the results.
However, in the case of clinical trials for various HPV vaccines, Big Pharma researchers opted for less rigorous methods and employed tactics to obscure the severity of vaccine-related injuries. Get this! Out of the 16 randomized trials conducted for HPV vaccines, only two utilized an inert saline placebo. Instead, ten of these trials compared the HPV vaccine to a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant, while four trials used an already-approved vaccine containing aluminum as the comparison. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to realize that using aluminum-containing placebos will likely muddy the comparison between the treatment and control groups. Talk about scientific shenanigans and trickery!
Another study published in the journal Vaccine comparing nearly 2 million unvaccinated and vaccinated adolescent Columbian girls for the 10-year period 2012 to 2021 revealed that the vaccinated girls were 4.4 times more prone to developing rheumatoid arthritis than their unvaccinated counterparts. During the follow-up period of 180 and 360 days post-vaccination, the girls in the Colombian study were also found to be 2.76 times more prone to developing juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 2.86 times more likely to develop thyrotoxicosis, and 2.54 times more likely to develop idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
In 2022, another Danish study published in the Journal of Autoimmunity provided further evidence linking HPV vaccination to autoimmune responses. The study's authors (Mehlsen et al.) underscore two significant factors that increase the likelihood of HPV vaccines triggering autoimmune responses.
Firstly, the authors emphasized another crucial aspect: specific proteins present in HPV vaccines share similarities with human proteins. In scientific parlance, this phenomenon is termed “molecular mimicry.” According to Yehuda Schoenfeld, an autoimmunity expert, molecular mimicry, mainly when facilitated by potent adjuvants, can instigate immune cross-reactivity, leading to the development of autoimmune diseases.
Secondly, both formulations of Gardasil contain aluminum adjuvants, making them highly immunogenic. These aluminum compounds are deliberately included to stimulate an immune response that might not otherwise occur. According to the CDC’s Vaccine Excipient List, Gardasil's “secret sauce” is aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS). Shockingly, this “proprietary” ingredient from Merck has never been tested for safety in humans.
Nevertheless, despite the lack of safety testing and the destruction, deaths, and damage, Merck unveiled two fresh strategies earlier this month to expand the worldwide market for its HPV vaccines, including their initial single-dose HPV injections and multivalent HPV vaccines tailored for Asian and African populations. If you’re wondering why Merck would continue pushing Gardasil despite the damage, look no further than their financial statements. In 2023, Merck’s reported global profits from Gardasil increased 29% over 2022 to a whopping $8.9 billion!
In total, Merck is currently contending with 140 lawsuits in federal court filed by individuals who experienced various severe injuries following Gardasil administration. One of the lawsuits alleges Gardasil caused a 13-year-old boy’s death. Side effects (which are actually direct effects of the vaccine) include premature ovarian failure, autoimmune and neurological conditions like postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), fibromyalgia, encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and cancer. Additionally, more than 200 pending claims are related to Gardasil injuries in the Vaccine Court.
The Truth About Cancer is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The data indicate that countries with high Gardasil adoption rates also exhibit higher cancer rates among younger women. In contrast, older women adhering to the Pap test regimen but not receiving vaccination demonstrate decreased rates.
Despite this, Merck persists in promoting the vaccine for children, claiming it provides protection against future cancers. Furthermore, Merck-funded researchers are still exploring methods to enhance vaccination rates among children.
Fortunately, it appears that the public is becoming increasingly aware of the deception and fraud surrounding the HPV vaccine. However, this increased awareness does little to help the tens of thousands of young women (and men) across the globe who have already been affected by Gardasil.
According to reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), over 44,000 cases of adverse events had been reported as of mid-March 2024, with tens of thousands more injuries likely going unreported.

04/23/2024

Read and be aware.

How Pharma Medications May Be Causing Alzheimer’s Disease

Has the Alzheimer’s Association been misleading people by confusing every memory loss incident as Alzheimer’s Disease? Not shockingly, it seems that a great many of these campaigns are paid for by pharmaceutical companies with something to gain in the long-term. Alzheimer’s drugs are a big thriving business. Let’s face it, no one wants to grow into a shell of themselves that can’t remember their children’s’ names. It seems like in most cases, massive informational campaigns are seeded into the public prior to FDA approvals for the very drugs they seek to “inform” us about.
A year ago, Alzheimer’s support groups – particularly the Big Pharma-subsidized Alzheimer’s Association -aggressively sponsored a documentary that featured the dementia of country singer Glen Campbell. Campbell had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease despite the well-documented fact that Campbell was infamous for his chronic heavy use of brain-damaging, dementia-inducing, addictive, and very neurotoxic drugs like co***ne and alcohol. Therefore, in reality his dementia was most likely caused by his neurotoxic drug abuse which likely was worsened by the fact that he had also used a lot of brain-altering psychotropic prescription drugs simultaneously. Popular performers like Campbell, who are frequently on mentally- and physically-exhausting concert tours, are well-known to over-use chemical cocktails of illicit and legal drugs, which, when used simultaneously, have far worse than additive adverse effects on the body and brain.
The experience of the equally early dementia victim and legendary long-term user of illicit brain-altering drugs, Robin Williams, was similar to Campbell in that both used excessive amounts of psychotropic substances that had adverse effects on their brains, livers and psyches. Williams had recently been diagnosed as having Parkinson’s Disease and Lewy Body dementia (both of unknown etiology!). His desperate act of su***de came in the context of newly-prescribed psychiatric drugs that had been prescribed at Minnesota’s Hazelden facility. The prescription drugs were well-known to cause suicidal thinking.
So what is causing memory loss? According to Havard University, medications are. They have an entire guide that cites their findings.
“medications are common culprits in mental decline. With aging, the liver becomes less efficient at metabolizing drugs, and the kidneys eliminate them from the body more slowly. As a result, drugs tend to accumulate in the body. Elderly people in poor health and those taking several different medications are especially vulnerable.”
“The list of drugs that can cause dementia-like symptoms is long. It includes antidepressants, antihistamines, anti-Parkinson drugs, anti-anxiety medications, cardiovascular drugs, anticonvulsants, corticosteroids, narcotics, sedatives.”
“Alzheimer’s is distinguished from other dementias at autopsy by the presence of sticky beta-amyloid plaques outside brain cells (neurons) and fibrillary tangles within neurons (all indicative of cellular death). Although such lesions may be present in any aging brain, in people with Alzheimer’s these lesions tend to be more numerous and accumulate in areas of the brain involved in learning and memory.”
“The leading theory is that the damage to the brain results from inflammation and other biological changes that cause synaptic loss and malfunction, disrupting communication between brain cells. Eventually the brain cells die, causing tissue loss and cell carcasses or scars. In imaging scans, brain shrinkage is usually first noticeable in the hippocampus, which plays a central role in memory function.”

Then there is the case of statins and their potential relationship with cognitive decline. The Harvard Guide made no mention of statins. It all stemmed from an article back in 2010 in the Scientific American which put on display statin use and their links to memory loss. The article’s focal point was on the drugs Lipitor, Crestor and Zocor, the most popular cholesterol lowering medications. The article focused on users of the medications citing cognitive issues such as memory loss and brain fog. The FDA’s complaint entity, MedWatch, was filling up with entries regarding lapses in brain function by users of all three listed medications. Fat is the brain’s main fuel and cholesterol plays an essential role in the formation of neuronal connections. This was much more than conspiracy theory, it had legs.
Many considered the idea that statin medications contribute to cognitive decline a conspiracy theory. Soon following, a major study was conducted that many regarded as ultimate proof that statins don’t contribue to cognitive decline and in fact, help the brain. But the study does not firmly take any such position.
Mid-life dyslipidemia appears to play an important role in the development of AD amongst a host of other risk factors that affect vascular health. Results from observational cohorts have been mixed, though many of the highest-quality studies have found a protective effect for statins. Laboratory data have supported numerous potential mechanisms for statin benefit including lipid reduction, vascular protection, and changes in cell-signaling and amyloid processing. However, short-term clinical trials of statins in AD patient populations have failed to show a sustained benefit in cognitive outcomes, perhaps due to an already advanced and irreversible disease process. Trials have not specifically addressed statins’ role in the primary prevention of AD, and such trials would be very challenging, if not impossible to conduct. Future studies should assess statin use during a critical period of risk in mid-life to explore effects on the later development of AD.
So what is the truth about Alzheimer’s Disease? Is it less prevalent than we think? Are high incident numbers merely propped up by medication uses, and in some cases, drug and alcohol abuse? We may never know the full truth.
I leave you with a few quotes to consider.
“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable…for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death.” – President Ronald Reagan
More than 50 conditions can cause or mimic the symptoms of dementia.” but “Alzheimer’s (can only be) distinguished from other dementias at autopsy.” — from a Harvard University Health Publication entitled “What’s Causing Your Memory Loss? It Isn’t Necessarily Alzheimer’s”
“Medications have now emerged as a major cause of mitochondrial damage, which may explain many adverse effects. All classes of psychotropic drugs have been documented to damage mitochondria, as have statin medications, analgesics such as acetaminophen, and many others.” – Drs Neustadt and Pieczenik, authors of “Medication-induced Mitochondrial Damage and

04/23/2024

An interesting read.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty: Ultimate Global Control Is Right Around the Corner

Although President Trump gave notice in July 2020 that the US was going to leave the World Health Organization, Biden immediately rejoined after the January 2021 inauguration. With the flick of a pen, America once again became the largest funder of the agency’s $2.4 billion budget. The US provides about $420 million, or 20 percent, of the WHO budget.
Newly infused with cash, the WHO set about draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The WHO was bolstered by the COVID pandemic “public health emergency.” It worked so well. Most countries went along with masks, lockdowns and untested emergency use authorization (EUA) vaccines. Now the WHO is feverishly working toward the approval of these amendments. The prize? Ultimate power and total control of the entire (depopulated) world, all under the guise of health.
Notice how the COVID pandemic was still going strong, and all WHO could talk about was the next pandemic – and the next one, and the next one, and the next one. After all, they can’t have a pandemic treaty without a pandemic, now can they?
What does it mean?
The amendments, now called the Pandemic Agreement, would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.
Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.
Who is leading the charge?
In 2017, an Ethiopian named Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus heavily campaigned to succeed Margaret Chan as head of the WHO. Africa had never led the organization, and it was “their turn.” Ghebreyesus is highly controversial. He served as Minister of Health in Ethiopia from 2006 to 2011, and is accused of concealing three cholera epidemics during his tenure. This deprived his country of international aid.
Ghebreyesus is called a “doctor”, but he isn’t one. He has led the WHO for six years, and during that time he seems to have learned not to conceal epidemics but to declare them. While the WHO has established no standards for declaring a pandemic, Ghebreyesus has declared three during his tenure. He has definitely learned that he gets much more power during a pandemic, and now he is marching toward ultimate authority.
Is anyone helping him? Yes, the Biden Administration is. According to an article in State of the Nation, “On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.” The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” By eliminating that and other key clauses, all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.”
Dr. Tenpenny recently had an eye-opening interview with Dr. Meryl Nass regarding this topic. By the way, both ladies ARE actually doctors. Nass has been one of very few medical professionals sounding the alarm about the global pandemic treaty since well before 2022. (For a synopsis on the events leading up to 2022, read Dr. Tenpenny’s article here.)

Nass says that the WHO has been working secretly since 2022. No one has seen any new amendments, despite the fact that the vote on the final is supposed to occur next month in May 2024. However, the latest 2022 draft gives a chilling peek into what they intend. The WHO wants a pathogen library and wants to freely send pathogens to universities around the world for “study.” They want genetic sequencing labs in every country. Why? They also want to force countries to develop permanent EUA processes to roll out any drug or vaccine or God knows what else at any time. Goodbye testing, and goodbye informed consent. Accompanying that, WHO is forcing countries to pass laws to then ensure that the EUA drug manufacturers have no liability.
One thing is for sure. The public is not being honestly informed about this treaty. The changes make no sense medically, and are very restrictive, designed to control, rather than care for, populations. A team of unelected, nameless, faceless people thousands of miles away decide what constitutes a health emergency (like one case of bird flu or a few cases of Marburg) and how America will respond. A medical police state would be set up in our country and would use surveillance to make sure we do as we’re told. Any dissenting voices would be quickly squelched from social media, because the treaty would provide that power, too.
It will supersede our US Constitution, so there’s not much we’ll be able to do about it when we disagree. Your primary physician will have to comply with their orders as well. It will be more of the same we’ve already seen with COVID. You won’t get early treatment with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, and everyone in the world will be perpetually jabbed or vaccinated with dangerous substances whether you need it or not. Natural immunity will continue to be ignored because we’ll be following the WHO directives and not the actual science.
Nass also explains that the WHO has some very unique provisions. Unlike all other UN agencies, WHO has its own constitution, meaning it can make treaties with other nations. If the treaty passes, there will be no higher health authority. The WHO constitution further states that they are not under jurisdiction of any court. This translates to an incredible built-in ability to avoid accountability. Putting it under the guise of health makes it a perfect globalist organization. But they’re not about health, now are they?
Nass says the wording of the amendments is intentionally complicated. She herself, an expert in the topic, took several months to digest it and even had to hire lawyers to decipher much of the legalese. A final document will likely be just as complicated and introduced at the 11th hour, right before the vote in May.
It’s funny how “journalists” barely out of school are coming out of the woodwork to discredit Nass, like in this idiotic Politifact piece. This stellar writer refers to Nass as “a woman who claimed the WHO’s plans would strip people of certain rights.” Politifact tried to discredit Nass, who said, “We’re undergoing a soft coup. The idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda.”
The journalist prides herself on finding out that Meta blocked posts highlighting Nass’ testimony to the European Parliament, while at the same time highlighting Politifact’s partnership with Meta. Really? How blatant can you be?
Who do you believe? A liberal youngling from Missouri who has no medical background writing for Politifact and making a statement like this: “We found no evidence to suggest that this pandemic-focused accord would remove human rights protections, mandate surveillance or infringe on people’s freedom of speech.” (Right, because no one has seen any draft since 2022, you di**it!)
Or do you believe Dr. Meryl Nass? I know who I pick.
What can you do?
As we approach the next few weeks, a significant decision looms at the World Health Organization (WHO), but very few know about it. We must stop the WHO. First, educate yourself by clicking on the links in this article, or by visiting Dr. Nass’ website Door to Freedom, which has extensive information on this treaty. Also, watch this eye-opening commentary by NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe Fisher, who sheds further light on the implications of WHO’s proposed IHR amendments.

Click here to see Dr. Tenpenny’s interview with NVIC chair Barbara Loe Fisher.
Next, take action. Both sites have action steps you can take to protect your freedoms and U.S. sovereignty. Healthcare is not a federal issue; Nass says states can pass laws to boot WHO out of their business. Louisiana did that recently; read that here. Nass also states that this can be done at the county level, and that she knows of several counties in Florida doing just that.
Let’s unite in defending fundamental rights and shaping a future where individual autonomy reigns. It’s time to stop the WHO.
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Get more of Dr. Tenpenny’s voice of reason at her website.

Address

Westlake, OH

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 6pm
Tuesday 8am - 1pm
Wednesday 8am - 6pm
Thursday 8am - 1pm
Friday 8am - 6pm

Telephone

+14408089840

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Chiropractic Associates of Westlake posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Chiropractic Associates of Westlake:

Shortcuts

Share

Category