03/04/2026
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about something I’m seeing in friendships, communities, and online spaces, and I want to share it honestly.
Caring about the world matters. Feeling anger, grief, or moral outrage when something unjust or heartbreaking happens is part of being human. Empathy is one of the things that makes us compassionate and connected. But I’m noticing how easy it is for many of us to become immersed in a constant stream of tragedy, outrage, and suffering that we witness from a distance through news and social media.
There are actually psychological terms for some of these patterns. One is vicarious trauma, where repeated exposure to the suffering of others can start to impact our own nervous systems, even if the event didn’t happen directly to us. Another concept sometimes discussed is trauma voyeurism, which is when people repeatedly consume distressing stories, disasters, and tragedies through media in ways that keep the nervous system activated. And related to that is what some researchers call outrage addiction — a cycle where our brains start seeking more content that provokes anger because those emotional spikes create a powerful chemical feedback loop.
When we are constantly exposed to upsetting information, our bodies can start living in a chronic stress response. Anger and distress get reinforced over and over again, and sometimes our identity becomes wrapped up in that outrage or suffering. At that point, it can begin to feel like staying angry or distressed is the only morally responsible way to care.
But there is an important distinction I’ve been reflecting on.
When something actually happens to you, there is real emotional processing and healing work to be done. Trauma, grief, and harm that someone personally experiences often require time, support, and genuine psychological work to integrate. In those situations, dismissing someone’s feelings or telling them to simply “move on” can absolutely be harmful.
But when something did not happen to you personally — when you are witnessing an event through the news or social media — you are not processing a personal trauma in the same way. The emotions you feel may be empathy, sadness, anger, or moral concern, which are all valid human reactions. But it is different from having a lived traumatic experience that your nervous system must heal from.
Because of that, the concept of spiritual bypassing doesn’t apply in the same way. Spiritual bypassing refers to avoiding the real emotional work that comes from one’s own pain or trauma by hiding behind spiritual language. If something did not happen to you personally, there is not a personal trauma that needs to be worked through in that same way. Allowing yourself to return to emotional regulation and to continue living your life is not bypassing healing work that exists — because that healing work was never yours to carry.
Empathy matters. Caring about injustice matters. But there is a difference between feeling empathy for suffering in the world and living in prolonged personal anguish over events that you are witnessing from afar.
Sometimes differences in coping styles can create tension between people. One person may process by continually discussing the issue, while another regulates by limiting exposure and returning to daily life. When those styles clash, it can sometimes turn into a moral conflict where one person feels judged for caring too much and the other feels judged for trying to stay emotionally regulated.
But caring and regulating are not opposites.
We can care deeply about injustice and still protect our mental and emotional well-being. We can stay informed without letting outrage become our identity. We can feel empathy without building a permanent home inside someone else’s suffering.
For me, the goal is to care about the world while also protecting the health of my own mind and nervous system. We can feel what is real, take action where we can, and then return to the work of living, loving, and contributing to the world in meaningful ways. Caring about the world should not require us to live in constant emotional suffering.