06/12/2020
TL;DR - when setting goals or addressing failure to meet a personal goal, remember that failure to meet them is not the same as failing to improve.
Yesterday I was reading a thematic analysis of how understanding and experience effects self-regulation behavioural change techniques (the sort of thing you do when studying health psychology).
I learned an important lesson (arguably also something you should do when at university), that failure to meet a goal is not the same as failure to improve.
Most of the older or more experienced participants were aware of the negative feelings associated with failing to meet goals, and so were deliberately setting low exercise goals so they would easily meet them. Anything else would be a bonus.
- I admit I've been like this a lot lately, and fear of failure has started to impact my ambition. However the purpose of goal setting is to push yourself a reasonable amount. Not to just set something easily achievable - there's a balance.
However, 64 year old Martin had a much better attitude to goal setting;
"The healthcare assistant was saying, yeah you're doing 30, so where do you want the target? 30-40?
Well, I've been in sales and marketing for 40 years. So you know, if you're gonna go for targets set a reasonable target. If you don't set a reasonable target you have got nothing to aim for. So if I aim for 60 and did 50 then I'm 20 min better off"
Another point; the study was targeted to older people (40-75).
Most of the younger, employed participants were realistically setting goals and planning around their work, whereas the older and retired participants found setting a specific time for exercise too restrictive.
This might be relevant for those of you that are working and need to schedule, compared to those of you with flexible work or more free time that might be better suited to loose exercise schedules.
https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aphw.12243